Linguistic methods of manipulative influence objectification (based on the English language analysis)


https://doi.org/10.28995/2686-7249-2025-3-243-249

Full Text:




Abstract

The article studies the issues of linguistic objectification in methods of manipulative influence on the consciousness of the listener. Manipulation is considered as a power and control technology, the forms of application of which vary from individual to mass. Being one of the types of communicative influence, manipulation is aimed at achieving the desired result, effect, and therefore has a fairly clear structure that includes several elements: subject, object, manipulation aim and result. In addition, manipulative influences can be classified. Often, manipulation is hidden in nature, since it is perceived as a negative phenomenon, although it is not always so. However, in the process of interaction, various verbal and non-verbal tools of manipulation are consciously and unconsciously perceived, including patterns and tactics, as well as symbolic words. They serve as a kind of triggers that launch the process of two-way interaction. The study of such tools is of great scientific interest to modern researchers. In this article, English idiomatic expressions, as well as examples of Donald Trump’s public speech, are considered as factual material. The main emphasis is on the issues of presenting lies and the distortion of reality associated with them.


About the Author

N. V. Shelepova
Astrakhan State Technical University
Russian Federation

Natalia V. Shelepova - Cand. of Sci. (Philology), Astrakhan State Technical University.

16/1, Tatishchev St., Astrakhan, 414056



References

1. Boldyrev, N.N. (2023), “Secondary interpretation of the world as a way of linguistic manipulation of consciousness”, in Konnova, M.N., ed., Manipulyatsii i sotsium: yazyk, soznanie, kul’tura: sbornik nauchnykh trudov [Manipulations and society. Language, consciousness, culture. Collected scientific papers], Izdatel’stvo BFU im. I. Kanta, Kaliningrad, Russia.

2. Danesi, M. (2020), The art of the lie. How the manipulation of language affects our minds, Prometheus Publisher, New York, USA.

3. Dem’yankov, V.Z. (2023), “Maneuvering in everyday communication and in poetry”, World of linguistics and communication: electronic scientific journal, no. 2, pp. 6–18, available at: URL: http://tverlingua.ru/archive/072/1_72.pdf (Accessed 10 Jan. 2024).

4. Knyazeva, I.V. (2010), “Historical evolution of the manipulation forms in public consciousness”, Nauchnye vedomosti Belgorodskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Seriya Filosofiya. Sotsiologiya. Pravo, vol. 91, no. 20, iss. 14, pp. 220–225.

5. Simon, G.K. (1996), In sheep’s clothing: Understanding and dealing with manipulative people. Parkhurst Brothers, Incorporated Publishers, Marion, MI, USA.

6. Sur, E.I. (2012), “Manipulation: concept, main features and structure”, Aktual’nye problemy gumanitarnykh i estestvennykh nauk, no. 3, pp. 143–146.


Supplementary files

For citation: Shelepova N.V. Linguistic methods of manipulative influence objectification (based on the English language analysis). RSUH/RGGU Bulletin: “Literary Teory. Linguistics. Cultural Studies”, Series. 2025;(3):243-249. https://doi.org/10.28995/2686-7249-2025-3-243-249

Views: 15

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2073-6355 (Print)