A General Inventory of Surface-Syntactic Relations. Part Two


https://doi.org/10.28995/2686-7249-2016-9-94-120

Full Text:




Abstract

A universal list of surface-syntactic relations [SSyntRels] is compiled based on the idea that a SSyntRel r is “the same” in different languages if and only if this r has the same set of core functions in all these languages (just like the nominative in different languages is still a nominative since it is used everywhere for nomination-its core function; its other functions might be different). A few remarks are formulated on the Deep-Syntactic structure: 12 universal deep-syntactic relations are briefly introduced, and a list of 30 fictitious lexemes is presented (they are used in DSyntSs to represent syntactic constructions carrying lexical-type meanings). After a concise characterization of SSyntRels, the paper offers a list of 112 SSyntRels known in world languages: subordinate and coordinate; the subordinate SSyntRels are divided into clause-level and phrase-level SSyntRels, with further subdivision into valence-controlled vs. non-valence-controlled and then into Noun Phrase SSyntRels, Adpositional Phrase SSyntRels, etc.

About the Author

Igor Mel’Čuk
The Canadian Royal Society; The Austrian Academy of Sciences; Besancon University (France)
Russian Federation


References

1. Danlos L., Sagot B., Stern R. Analyse discursivedes incises de citation // Congrès Mondial de Linguistique Française - CMLF2010 / Ed. par F. Neveu, V. Muni Toke, J. Durand, T. Klingler, L. Mondada, S. Prévost. P.: Institut de linguistique française, 2010. P. 2237-2254.

2. Haspelmath M. The Serial Verb Construction: Comparative Concept and Cross-linguistic Generalizations // Academia.edu. URL: https://www.academia.edu/10652772/The_serial_verb_construction_Comparative_concept_and_cross-linguistic_generalizations.

3. Imrényi A. The Syntax of Hungarian Auxiliaries: A Dependency Grammar Account // Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Dependency Linguistics [DEPLING 2013] / Ed. by E. Hajičová, K. Gerdes, L. Wanner. Prague: Charles University, 2013. P. 118-127.

4. Иомдин Л. Л. О модели русского синтаксиса // Апресян Ю.Д., Богуславский И.М. , Иомдин Л.Л., Санников В.З. Теоретические проблемы русского синтаксиса. Взаимодействие грамматики и словаря. М.: Языки славянских культур, 2010. C. 21-43.

5. Iordanskaja L., Mel’čuk I. On a Class of Russian Verbs Which Can Introduce Direct Speech // The Slavic Verb / Ed. by P. Jakobsen, H. Krag. Copenhagen: Rosenkilde & Bagger, 1981. P. 51-66.

6. Iordanskaja L., Mel’čuk I. Establishing an Inventory of Surface-Syntactic Relations: Valence-Controlled Surface-Syntactic Dependents of the Verb in French // Dependency in Linguistic description / Ed. by A. Polguère, I. Mel’čuk. Amsterdam; Philadelphia: John Benjamins, 2009. P. 151-234.

7. Marneffe M.-C., de, & Manning C. Stanford Typed Dependencies Manual, 2008-2016 // Nlp.stanford.edu. URL: http://nlp.stanford.edu/software/dependencies_manual.pdf.

8. Мельчук И.А. Опыт теории лингвистических моделей Смысл-Текст. Семантика. Синтаксис. М.: Наука, 1974.

9. Mel’čuk I. Dependency Syntax: Theory and Practice. Albany, N. Y.: The SUNY Press, 1988.

10. Mel’čuk I. Dependency in Natural Language // Dependency in Linguistic description / Ed. by A. Polguère, I. Mel’čuk. 2009. P. 1-110.

11. Мельчук И.А. Язык. От смысла к тексту. М.: Языки славянских культур, 2012.

12. Mel’čuk I. Semantics: From Meaning to Text: In 3 vols. Amsterdam; Philadelphia: John Benjamins, 2012

13. Mel’čuk I. The East/South-East Asian Answer to the European Passive // Acta Linguistica petropolitana / Ed. by S. Dmitrenko, N. Zaika. 2014. Vol. 10 (3). P. 451-472.

14. Mel’čuk I. Syntactic Subject: Syntactic Relations, Once Again / Под ред. О.В. Федоровой, Е.А. Лютиковой, М.А. Даниэль, В.А. Плунгяна, С.Г. Татевосова // Язык. Константы. Переменные. Памяти Александра Евгеньевича Кибрика. СПб.: Алетейя, 2014. С. 169-216.

15. Mel’čuk I. Multiple “Subjects” and Multiple “Objects” in Korean // Language Research. 2015. Vol. 51. (3). P. 485-516.

16. Mel’čuk I., Pertsov. N. Surface Syntax of English. A Formal Model within the Meaning-Text Framework. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 1987.

17. Dependency in Linguistic description / Ed. by A. Polguère, I. Mel’čuk. Amsterdam; Philadelphia: John Benjamins, 2009.

18. Quirk R., Greenbaum S., Leech G., Svartvik J. A Comprehensive Grammar of the English Language. L.; N. Y.: Longman, 1991.

19. Вайс Д. Русские двойные глаголы: кто хозяин, а кто слуга? // Слово в тексте и в словаре: Сб. статей к 70-летию академика Ю.Д. Апресяна / Под ред. Л. Иомдина, Л, Крысина. М.: Языки русской культуры, 2000. С. 356-378.

20. Wechsler S. The Semantic Basis of Argument Structure. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications, Stanford University, 1995.


Supplementary files

For citation: Mel’Čuk I. A General Inventory of Surface-Syntactic Relations. Part Two. RSUH/RGGU Bulletin: “Literary Teory. Linguistics. Cultural Studies”, Series. 2016;(9):94-120. https://doi.org/10.28995/2686-7249-2016-9-94-120

Views: 354

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2073-6355 (Print)