Principia verbi in Varro’s linguistic doctrine and the Stoic theory of πάθος
https://doi.org/10.28995/2686-7249-2025-11-406-414
Abstract
The article considers the division of the word in Varro’s linguistic doctrine into two constituent parts, referred to as principia (“primary elements”). Those components (material and figura), being inextricably linked, cannot exist separately. Varro comes to such a conclusion while studying the process of word modification (declinatio). The principia of the word identified by Varro allow him to derive his own conditions for the correctness of analogy. An examination of the concepts material and figura reveals their similarity to the opposition ὕλη – σχῆμα in the Stoic theory of πάθος. In theory, πάθος primary matter (ὕλη) under the influence of an active principle – namely, the λόγος inherent in matter – acquires a definite form (σχῆμα). In Varro, the original categories of the word (materia), under the influence of the universal law of language (ratio), through changing components (casus, exitus eius) acquire the form (figura) necessary to reflect the interconnection of things and phenomena. A comparative analysis demonstrates that the similarity is not coincidental but stems from the tradition of studying the linguistic phenomena in that period, as well as from Varro’s own purposes and objectives who sought to establish a comprehensive doctrine of the Latin language.
About the Author
N. V. DrachyovaРоссия
Nina V. Drachyova, Cand. of Sci. (Philology)
6-6, Miusskaya Sq., Moscow, 125047
References
1. Grintser, N.P. (1990), “Stoic doctrine. The picture of the world and the system of language”, in Balkanskie chteniya – I. Simpozium po strukture teksta: Tezisy i materialy [Balkan Scientific Conference – I. Symposium on Text Structure. Conference abstracts and proceedings], Institut slavyanovedeniya i balkanistiki AN SSSR, Moscow, USSR, pp. 16–19.
2. Drachyova, N.V. (2013), Lingvisticheskaya terminologiya Marka Terentsiya Varrona (na materiale VIII–X knig traktata “De Lingua Latina”) [Linguistic terminology of Marcus Terentius Varro (based on material of 8th – 10th of the book “Lingua Latina”)], Abstract of Ph.D. dissertation (Philology), MGU imeni M.V. Lomonosova, Moscow, Russia.
3. Karakulakov, V.V. (1965), “Varro’s role in the development of the doctrine of ‘conditions for the correctness of analogy’ ”, in the system of inflection”, in Karakulakov, V.V. et al., eds., Voprosy russkogo i obshchego yazykoznaniya [Issues in Russian and general linguistics], Irfon, Dushanbe, USSR, pp. 135–159. (“Uchenye zapiski” Ministerstva narodnogo obrazovaniya Tadzhikskoi SSR, Dushanbinskii gosudarstvennyi pedagogicheskii institut imeni T.G. Shevchenko, seriya filologicheskaya; t. 33, vyp. 18)
4. Karakulakov, V.V. (1967), “From the history of the development of the doctrine of the grammatical category of number in Roman linguistics”, in Karakulakov, V.V. et al., eds., Yazykoznanie i literaturovedenie [Linguistics and literary studies], Irfon, Dushanbe, USSR, pp. 147–155. (“Uchenye zapiski” Ministerstva narodnogo obrazovaniya Tadzhikskoi SSR, Dushanbinskii gosudarstvennyi pedagogicheskii institut imeni T.G. Shevchenko, filologicheskaya seriya; t. 51, vyp. 19)
5. McAlhany, J. (2003), Truth, language, and illogic in the writings of Varro, Thesis Ph. D. (Philosophy), Columbia University, New York, USA.
6. Melo de, W., ed. (2019), Varro: De lingua Latina. Introduction, text, translation, and commentary, vols. 1–2, Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK.
7. Nikolskii, B.M. (1994), “The Stoic theory of pathos”, in Znaki Balkan [Signs of the Balkans], part 1, Radiks, Moscow, Russia, pp. 212–232. (Balkanskie chteniya)
8. Sidorovich, O.V. (2005), Annalisty i antikvary: rimskaya istoriografiya kontsa III–I vv. do nashei ery [Annalists and antiquarians. Roman historiography (late 3rd – 1st centuries BC)], RGGU, Moscow, Russia.
9. Stolyarov, A.A. (1995), Stoya i stoitsizm [The Stoa (porch) and stoicism], AO “Kami Grup”, Moscow, Russia.
Review
For citations:
Drachyova N.V. Principia verbi in Varro’s linguistic doctrine and the Stoic theory of πάθος. RSUH/RGGU Bulletin: “Literary Teory. Linguistics. Cultural Studies”, Series. 2025;(11(2)):406-414. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.28995/2686-7249-2025-11-406-414
JATS XML













