Preview

RSUH/RGGU Bulletin: “Literary Teory. Linguistics. Cultural Studies”, Series

Advanced search

Dante’s rhetorical models in Inferno XIII

https://doi.org/10.28995/2073-6355-2018-3-295-315

Abstract

The paper discusses some controversial questions concerning the role of rhetoric within Canto XIII of the ‘Inferno’ in the Divine Comedy . According to the point of view adopted in contemporary Dante studies, the canto’s sumptuous rhetorical orchestration was designed by Dante to create a stylistic portrait of the canto’s main character, the Chancellor of Emperor Frederick II and a distinguished dictatore Pier della Vigna, in whose tragic destiny the poet allegedly saw parallels with his own life. The direct consequence of the theory of “Pier as Dante’s alter ego ” is a widespread tendency to reduce the role of rhetoric in ‘Inferno’ XIII to simple mimesis and to identify ars dictaminis as the canto’s only default model. The author first exposes the weak points of this interpretative approach, then analyses an alternative hypothesis (formulated by D. Higgins) of Cicero’s “De inventione” and the ancient forensic rhetorical tradition as Dante’s primary sources of inspiration. Finally, she gives a few insights on how this last thesis changes our perception of the role of rhetoric in the poem’s poetics.

About the Author

Elena Moshonkina
Astrakhan State University
Russian Federation


References

1. Dante Alighieri. La Divina Commedia. Inferno. Commento di Anna Maria Chiavacci Leonardi. Milano: Mondadori, 2005. 1179 p.

2. Higgins D.H. Cicero, Aquinas, and St. Matthew in Inferno XIII // Dante Studies, with the Annual Report of the Dante Society. 1975. Vol. 93. P. 61-94.

3. Grévin B. Rhétorique du pouvoir médiéval: les Lettres de Pierre de la Vigne et la formation du langage politique européen (XIIIe-XVe siècle). Rome: École française de Rome, 2009. 1023 p.

4. Fiorentini L. Il commento dantesco di Benvenuto da Imola. L’elaborazione letteraria delle fonti storiografiche e cronistiche. Tesi di Dottorato. Roma: Sapienza Università degli Studi di Roma, 2010. 861 p.

5. Schaller H.M. Pier della Vigna // Enciclopedia Federiciana, Istituto dell’Enciclopedia Italiana Treccani. URL: http://www.treccani.it/enciclopedia/pier-dellavigna_(Federiciana)/) (дата обращения 9 мая 2018).

6. Bianchini S. La morte di Pier della Vigna tra realtà storica e “topos” letterario // Le letterature romanze del Medioevo: testi, storia, intersezioni / A. Pioletti (ed.). Soveria Mannelli: Rubbettino Editore, 2000. P. 63-87.

7. La chronique de Rains. Publiée sur le manuscrit unique de la Bibliothèque du roi par Louis Paris. Paris: Techener, 1837. 298 p.

8. Bellomo S. Dizionario dei commentatori danteschi. L’esegesi della “Commedia” da Iacopo Alighieri a Nidobeato. Firenze: Olschki, 2004. 415 p.

9. Ascoli A.R. Dante and the Making of a Modern Author. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2011. 458 p.

10. Fiorentini L. Il suicidio di Per Della Vigna: variazioni narrative negli antichi commenti danteschi // Annali dell’Istituto Italiano per gli Studi Storici. 2012/2013. Vol. 27. P. 145-207.

11. Hollander R. Pier delle Vigne and Judas Iscariot: A Note on Inferno XIII. URL: http://www.princeton.edu/~dante/ebdsa/hollander_071214.html (дата обращения 9 мая 2018).

12. Boyde P. Inferno XIII // Cambridge Readings in Dante’s Comedy. Cambridge, 1981. P. 1-22.

13. Paratore E. Analisi retorica del canto di Pier della Vigna // Tradizione e struttura in Dante / Paratore E. Firenze: Sansoni, 1968. P. 178-220.

14. La rettorica di Brunetto Latini / F. Maggini (ed. testo critico). Firenze: Galletti e Cocci, 1915. 143 p.

15. Delle Donne F. Le parole del potere: l’epistolario di Pier della Vigna // Pier delle Vigne in catene. Sarzana, 2006. P. 111-122.

16. Remer G. Rhetoric, Emotional Manipulation, and Political Morality: The Modern Relevance of Cicero vis-à-vis Aristotle // Rhetorica: A Journal of the History of Rhetoric. 2013. Vol. 31 (4). P. 402-443.

17. Ronconi A. Cicerone, Marco Tullio // Enciclopedia Dantesca. In 6 vols. Roma, 1970. Vol. 1. P. 991-997.

18. Murphy J. Rhetoric in the Middle Ages: A History of Rhetorical Theory from Saint Augustine to the Renaissance. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1974. 411 p.

19. Milano G. Dante politico fiorentino. Dante attraverso i documenti. II. Presupposti e contesti dell’impegno politico a Firenze (1295-1302) // Reti Medievali Rivista. 2017. Vol. 18 (1). P. 511-563.


Review

For citations:


Moshonkina E. Dante’s rhetorical models in Inferno XIII. RSUH/RGGU Bulletin: “Literary Teory. Linguistics. Cultural Studies”, Series. 2018;(3-2):295-315. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.28995/2073-6355-2018-3-295-315

Views: 285


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2073-6355 (Print)