The belt of bishop Caesarius of Arles. Between the ‘thing’ and the ‘symbol’
https://doi.org/10.28995/2686-7249-2021-5-10-30
Abstract
The article studies the question whether bishop Caesarius of Arles (503–542) could be the owner of a leather belt with an ivory buckle from the Museum of Antique Arles. The issue is the absence of narrative sources directly proving that idea. High price of the object did not match the bishop’s ascetic reputation. Still that did not preclude that someone from the closest circle of his associates or supporters could make that gift to Caesarius. The article studies the ornament of the movable ring of the buckle and the iconographic type of the plot of the Resurrection of Christ carved on its surface. Some parts of the belt, its decoration and manufacturing techniques find parallels with various artifacts (buckles, sarcophagi, diptychs) stored in other museums or discovered during archaeological excavations in Gaul. A review of the elements of the liturgical vestments of the clergy of Late Antiquity led to the conclusion that the belt could not have a liturgical status. On the basis of narrative sources related to the life and work of Caesarius, the author makes assumptions about the possible extra-liturgical contexts of wearing such a belt. The data presented in the study make it possible not only to attribute the belt to the period of bishop Caesarius’s life, but also to consider the latter as the most likely owner of the thing.
Supporting agencies: express my gratitude for the valuable comments made during the preparation of the article to S.N. Gukova and A.A. Palamarchuk.
About the Author
D. M. Omelchenko
St. Petersburg Institute of History of the Russian Academy of Sciences
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Darya M. Omelchenko, Cand. of Sci (History)
bld. 7, Petrozavodskaya St., Saint Petersburg, 197110
References
1. Adamova, T.V. (2019), “The history of liturgical vestments based on the analysis of monuments of fine art”, St. Tikhon’s University Review, Series V: Issues of History and Theory of Christian Art, vol. 35, pp. 9–32.
2. Gaillard de Sémainville, H. (2008), “À propos de plaques-boucles mérovingiennes à motif chrétien”, Bulletin du centre d’études médiévales d’Auxerre, no. 12, available at: http://journals.openedition.org/cem/6752 (Accessed 30 Jan. 2021).
3. Gukova, S.N. (2015), “The Sautoir of the Unsleeping Eye. On the iconography and content of the image”, in Gerd, L.A. (ed.), Spicilegium Byzantino-Rossicum. Sbornik statey k 80-letiyu I.P. Medvedeva [Collection of articles for the 80th anniversary of I.P. Medvedev], Indrik, Moscow, Saint Petersburg, Russia, pp. 131–154.
4. Martin, M. (1979), Die Romanen, in Drack, W. (ed.), Ur- und frühgeschichtliche Archäologie der Schweiz, vol. 6, Schweizerische Gesellschaft für Ur- und Frühgeschichte, Basel, Switzerland, ss. 11–20.
5. Martin, M. (1988), “Bemerkungen zur frühmittelalterlichen Knochenschnalle eines Klerikergrabes der St. Verenakirche von Zurzach (Kt. Aargau)”, Jahrbuch der Schweizerischen Gesellschaft für Ur- und Frühgeschichte, no. 71, ss. 161–177.
6. Martin, M. (2001), “Frühmittelalterliche Reliquiarschnallen”, in Daim, F. and Kühtreiber, T. (ed.), Sein und Sinn, Burg und Mensch. Niederösterreichische Landesausstellung, St. Pölten, Austria, ss. 360–365.
7. Qutiérrez Cuenca, E. and Hierro Gárate, J.Á. (2007), “Nuevas perspectivas para la reconstrucción histórica del tránsito entre la Antigüedad y la Alta Edad Media en Cantabria: la necrópolis de Santa María de Hito”, Nivel cero: revista del grupo arqueológico Attica, no. 11, pp. 97–116.
8. Qutiérrez Cuenca, E. and Hierro Gárate, J.Á. (2015), “¿Gato burgundio por liebre omeya?”, available at: http://mauranus.blogspot.com/2015/01/gato-burgundiopor-liebre-omeya.html (Accessed 11 Feb. 2021).
9. Schulze-Dörrlamm, M., (2009), Byzantiniche Gürtelschnallen und Gürtelbeschläge im Römicsch Germanischen Zentralmuzeum. Tail II: Die Schnallen mit Scharnierbeschläg und die Schnallen mit Angegossenem Riemendurchzug des 7. bis 10. Jahrhunderts, Verlag des Römicsch-Germanischen Zentralmuzeums, Mainz, Germany.
Review
For citations:
Omelchenko D.M. The belt of bishop Caesarius of Arles. Between the ‘thing’ and the ‘symbol’. RSUH/RGGU Bulletin: “Literary Teory. Linguistics. Cultural Studies”, Series. 2021;(5):10-30. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.28995/2686-7249-2021-5-10-30
Views:
126
Email this article 