Preview

RSUH/RGGU Bulletin: “Literary Teory. Linguistics. Cultural Studies”, Series

Advanced search

On the principles of depicting internal space in Russian iconography

https://doi.org/10.28995/2686-7249-2021-5-69-92

Abstract

The article discusses four key principles of demonstrating the inner space in Russian iconography. The first three techniques are different variations of framing the characters with an architectural or geometric ‘border’. These are: placing the figures against the background of buildings that in such case themselves play the role of a frame that bringing the characters inside the depicted house; a ‘retractable’ architectural element– a colonnade or wall that frames the characters from behind and brings them into the interior space; finally, the nutrovye palaty (inner chambers) – a frame that ‘cuts’ the building with high arches and allows the painter to show both the interior of the building and fragments of its exterior. Similar principles of ‘cutting’ the composition with frames, ‘bordering’ a number of characters with a geometric line, were used to demonstrate scenes related to another time or space (visions, events of the past or future, etc.). The fourth technique was the partial overlap of the depicted figure with an architectural element (a person looking out from behind a column, from a window, from a doorway). It is based on the impression of an outside observer and refers no longer to the conventional, but to realistic techniques in painting. As shown in the article, all four variants coexisted in Russian iconography and could easily complement each other in a composition. The paper demonstrates the functioning of each of those techniques based on the corpus of Russian icons and miniatures.

About the Author

D. I. Antonov
Russian State University for the Humanities
Russian Federation

Dmitriy I. Antonov, Dr. of Sci. (History), professor

bld. 6, Miusskaya Sq., Moscow, 125993

  


References

1. Antonov, D.I. (2017), “ The icon-painter and the viewer: the icon as a text and image-object”, in: Togoeva, O.I. and Danilevskii, I.N. (eds.), Kazus: Individual’noe i unikal’noe v istorii – 2017 [Special case. The individual and unique in history], issue 12, Indrik, Moscow, Russia, pp. 242–256.

2. Antonov, D.I.and Maizul’s, M.R. (2013), Anatomiya ada: Putevoditel’ po drevnerusskoi vizual’noi demonologii [Anatomy of Hell. A guide to Old Russian visual demonology], Forum-Neolit, Moscow, Russia.

3. Antonov, D.I. and Maizul’s, M.R. (2020), Anatomiya ada: Putevoditel’ po drevnerusskoi vizual’noi demonologii [Anatomy of Hell. A guide to Old Russian visual demonology], 4th expanded edition, Forum-Neolit, Moscow, Russia.

4. Nechaev, V.N. (1929), “The inner (nutrovye) chambers in Russian painting of the 17th century”, in Russkoe iskusstvo XVII v. [Russian art of the 17th century], Academia, Leningrad, pp. 27–62.

5. Preobrazhenskii, A.S. (2016), “Western motifs and forms in Post-Byzantine painting in Muscovy. Preliminary idea”, Aktual’nye problemy teorii i istorii iskusstva: Sb. nauch. statei [Current issues of the theory and history of art. Collection of articles], no. 6, pp. 252–266.

6. Raushenbakh, B.V. (2001), Geometriya kartiny i zritel’noe vospriyatie [Painting Geometry and Visual Perception], Azbuka-klassika, Saint-Petersburg, Russia.

7. Uspenskii, B.A. (2005), Semiotika iskusstva: Poehtika kompozitsii. Semiotika ikony. Stat’i ob iskusstve [Semiotics of Art: The Poetics of Composition. Semiotics of Icons. Articles about art], Yazyki slavyanskoi kul’tury, Moscow, Russia.


Review

For citations:


Antonov D.I. On the principles of depicting internal space in Russian iconography. RSUH/RGGU Bulletin: “Literary Teory. Linguistics. Cultural Studies”, Series. 2021;(5):69-92. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.28995/2686-7249-2021-5-69-92

Views: 187


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2073-6355 (Print)