The world has become less. In memory of Andrei Karavashkin
https://doi.org/10.28995/2686-7249-2021-7-12-17
Abstract
The paper is devoted to the memory of Andrei Vital’evich Karavashkin (1964–2021) the philologist and historian, professor of the Russian State University for the Humanities. His scientific activities are considered. Its main results are noted: participation in the development of the methodology of historical phenomenology, that includes innovative ideas of “premiseless hermeneutics”, the concept of “royal sacrifice” and its role in the formation of the ideology of power in medieval Russia. Karavashkin made a great contribution to the study of the history and culture of Moscow Russia, the narrative of Ivan Peresvetov, Ivan the Terrible, Andrei Kurbsky. In the book “The Literary Custom of Old Rus” he proposed an original concept for the development of Old Russian literature. The importance of A.V. Karavashkin’s research in the humanities, synthesizing the historical and philological fields of knowledge is highly assessed.
About the Author
A. I. Filyushkin
Saint Petersburg State University
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Aleksandr I. Filyushkin, Dr. of Sci. (History), professor, Institute of History
bld. 7/9, Universitetskaya Embankment, Saint Petersburg, 199034
References
1. Isaev, D.P. (2013), “Source study of culture, or The phenomenological method in modern Russian historiography”, Klio, no 12, pp. 142–145.
2. Karavashkin, A.V. (2000a), “The only reality. On the methodological disputes of our time”, Rossiya XXI, no 6, pp. 121–139.
3. Karavashkin, A.V. (2000b), “Charisma of the king. The medieval concept of power as a subject of semiotic interpretation”, Odysseus. Man in history, pp. 257–275.
4. Karavashkin, A.V. and Filjushkin, A.I. (2000), “Events and Persons of Sacred History in the Epistles of Ivan the Terrible and Andrei Kurbsky”, Russkaya religioznost’: Problemy izucheniya, Saint Petersburg, Russia, pp. 84–92.
5. Karavashkin, A.V. (2003), “Irreversibility of the source reality”, Rossiya XXI, no. 4, pp. 124–133.
6. Karavashkin, A.V. and Yurganov, A.L. (2003), Opyt istoricheskoi fenomenologii: trudnyi put’ k ochevidnosti [An Essay of Historical Phenomenology: The Hard Road to Evidence], RGGU, Moscow, Russia.
7. Karavashkin, A.V. (2005a), “Bible Themed Keys. Verification Limits”, Uchenye zapiski Moskovskogo gumanitarnogo pedagogicheskogo instituta, no. 3, pp. 375–381.
8. Karavashkin, A.V. (2005b), “An Interdisciplinary Approach to Exploring the Bible Themed Keys”, Drevnyaya Rus’: Voprosy medievistiki, no. 3 (21), pp. 38–39.
9. Karavashkin, A.V. and Yurganov, A.L. (2005), Region Doksa. [Doxa region] Istochnikovedenie kul’tury., RGGU, Moscow, Russia.
10. Karavashkin, A.V. (2006), “Tormentor’s Power. Conventional models of tyranny in Russian history of the 11th–17th centuries”, Rossiya XXI, no. 4, pp. 62–109 .
11. Karavashkin, A.V. (2007), “Labyrinths of the centon-paraphrase method”, Yurganov, A.L. (ed.), Istochnikovedenie kul’tury. Al’manakh, RGGU, Moscow, Russia, pp. 374–381.
12. Krom, M.M. (2004), “The Seeing Myth”, or Paradoxes of “Historical Phenomenology”, Novoe literaturnoe obozrenie, no. 4 (68), pp. 309–319.
13. Uzhankov, A.N. (ed.) (1992), “Meetings of the All-Moscow Seminary of Researchers of Old Rus. 1991–1992”, Germenevtika drevnerusskoi literatury, iss. 3, Moscow, Russia, pp. 474–478.
Review
For citations:
Filyushkin A.I. The world has become less. In memory of Andrei Karavashkin. RSUH/RGGU Bulletin: “Literary Teory. Linguistics. Cultural Studies”, Series. 2021;(7):12-17. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.28995/2686-7249-2021-7-12-17
Views:
139
Email this article 