Votive gifts in Russia. Objects and practices
https://doi.org/10.28995/2686-7249-2022-4-50-69
Abstract
The paper considers the votive practices and gifts known in the Russian religious tradition. The author gives an overview of individual and collective vows common in medieval and imperial Russia, as well as the main types of votive gifts: buildings (churches, chapels), crosses, icons, reliquaries, icon salaries, church embroidery, fabrics, anatomical weights, precious gifts to icons, etc. Votive actions were the most important social tool for creating a variety of religious objects, from monumental (like monastery buildings and city cathedrals) to small (like shawls, towels or pendants in the form of a diseased organ). At the same time, the action of making, bringing, using the votive object and the material object itself were inextricably linked – the word ‘vow’ in Russia meant not only a promise, but also a monetary contribution to a monastery or church, and a votive object, and animals fattened for a sacrifice to a saint (holiday), and any other kind of gift, material or actional. As the author notes, a review of these traditions helps to better understand modern votive practices that have actively spread in Russia in the last decade.
About the Author
D. I. AntonovRussian Federation
Dmitriy I. Antonov - Dr. of Sci. (History), professor.
Bld. 6, Miusskaya Sq., Moscow, 125047
References
1. Antonov, D.I. (2018), “The two ‘bodies’ of the icon. Communication with the sacred image as appropriation of its power, RSUH/ RGGU Bulletin. “History. Philology. Cultural Studies. Oriental Studies” Series, no. 7, pp. 7–34.
2. Antonov, D.I. (2019), Tsari i samozvantsy: bor’ba idei v Rossii Smutnogo vremeni [Tsars and impostors. The struggle of ideas in Russia of the Time of Troubles], RSUH, Moscow, Russia.
3. Antonov, D.I. (2020), “Icons and reliquaries. On current trends in constructing the church space in today Russia”, RSUH/RGGU Bulletin. “Literary Theory. Linguistics. Cultural Studies” Series, no. 3, pp. 102–114.
4. Antonov, D.I. (2021), “Appropriation of virtue. The invisible ‘body’ of Holy objects in Christian traditions”, State, religion and church in Russia and Worldwide, no. 3, pp. 7–25.
5. Antonov, D.I. (2022), “Wells and furnaces. Ritualized disposal of consecrated objects in post-Soviet Orthodox tradition”, RSUH/RGGU Bulletin. “Literary Theory. Linguistics. Cultural Studies” Series, no. 2, pp. 30–43.
6. Antonov, D.I. and Doronin, D.Yu. (2022), Ikony sovetskoi ehpokhi: liki traditsii [Icons of the Soviet era. Faces of tradition], Indrik, Moscow, Russia.
7. Antonov, D.I. and Rychkova, N.N. (2020), “Brooms and wax babies. A votive tradition in Rhodes”, Zhivaya starina, no. 1, pp. 20–23.
8. Antonov, D.I. and Tyunina, S.M. (2022), “Disposal of consecrated objects. Texts and comments”, Zhivaya starina, no. 1, pp. 24–29.
9. Buseva-Davydova, I.L. (2008), Kul’tura i iskusstvo v ehpokhu peremen. Rossiya sem-nadtsatogo stoletiya [Culture and art in an era of change. Russia in the seventeenth century], Indrik, Moscow, Russia.
10. Durasov, G.P. (1977), “Kargopol ‘vow sewing’ ”, Sovetskaya ehtnografiya, no. 1, pp. 110–113.
11. Franklin, S. (2010), Pis’mennost’, obshchestvo i kul’tura v Drevnei Rusi (okolo 950– 1300 gg.) [Writing, society and culture in Ancient Russia (circa 950–1300)], Dmitrii Bulanin, Saint-Petersburg, Russia.
12. Gnutova, S.V. and Shchedrina, K.A. (2006), “The Kiysky Cross, the Holy monastery of the Cross and the transformation of the sacred space in the era of patriarch Nikon”, in Lidov, A.M. (ed.), Ierotopiya. Sozdanie sakral’nykh prostranstv v Vizantii i Drevnei Rusi [Ierotopia. Creation of sacred spaces in Byzantium and Ancient Russia], Indrik, Moscow, Russia.
13. Komova, M.A. (2012), Ikonnoe nasledie Orlovskogo kraya XVIII–XIX vekov [Iconic heritage of the Oryol region of the 18th – 20th centuries], Indrik, Moscow, Russia.
14. Kremleva, I.A. (2010), “The place of the vow in the worldview and everyday life of the Russian people”, in Kirichenko, O.V. (ed.), Svyatyni i svyatost’ v zhizni russk-ogo naroda: ehtnograficheskoe issledovanie [Shrines and holiness in the life of the Russian people. An ethnographic study], Nauka, Moscow, Russia, pp. 241–284.
15. Melekhova, G.N. (2010), “Ways to return the shrines”, in Kirichenko, O.V. (ed.), Svyatyni i svyatost’ v zhizni russkogo naroda: ehtnograficheskoe issledovanie [Shrines and holiness in the life of the Russian people. An ethnographic study], Nauka, Moscow, Russia, pp. 338–372.
16. Mitrofanov, A.G. (2013), Povsednevnaya zhizn’ russkogo provintsial’nogo goroda v XIX veke: poreformennyi period [Everyday life of a Russian provincial town in the 19th century. The Post-Reform period], Molodaya gvardiya, Moscow, Russia.
17. Preobrazhenskii, A.S. (2010), Ktitorskie portrety srednevekovoi Rusi. XI – nachalo XVI v. [Ktitor portraits of medieval Russia. 11th – the beginning of the 16th century], Severnyi palomnik, Moscow, Russia.
18. Sterligova, I.A. (1999), “Old Russian decorated icons of the 12th–13th centuries. Reconstruction experience”, Vizantiiskii vremennik, vol. 58, no. 83, pp. 178–185.
19. Tsekhanskaya, K.V. (2013), Pochitanie pravoslavnykh svyatyn’ v Rossii [Veneration of Orthodox shrines in Russia], Palomnik, Moscow, Russia.
20. Vlasov, A.N. (2011), Skazaniya i povesti o mestnochtimykh svyatykh i chudotvornykh ikonakh Vychegodsko-Severodvinskogo kraya XVI–XVII vekov: teksy i issledovaniya [Legends and stories about locally venerated saints and miraculous icons of the Vychegodsk-Severodvinsk region of the 16th–17th centuries. Texts and studies], Pushkinskii dom Publ., Saint-Petersburg, Russia.
21. Shchepanskaya, T.B. (1995), “Crisis network (traditions of spiritual development of space)”, Russkii Sever: K probleme lokal’nykh grupp [Russian North: On the prob-lem of local groups], MAE RAN, Saint-Petersburg, Russia, pp. 110–176.
Supplementary files
For citation: Antonov D.I. Votive gifts in Russia. Objects and practices. RSUH/RGGU Bulletin: “Literary Teory. Linguistics. Cultural Studies”, Series. 2022;(4):50-69. https://doi.org/10.28995/2686-7249-2022-4-50-69
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.