The cell, the grave and the church. The spread and appropriation of grace in the topography of Dunyushka’s shrine
https://doi.org/10.28995/2686-7249-2022-4-110-141
Abstract
The article analyzes folk ideas about the manifestations of grace in spatial (landscape) shrines associated with the names and paths of locally venerated saints in the village of Suvorovo (before 1965 Strakhova Puza) of the Diveyevsky district – Blessed Dunyushka Sheikova / Shikova and her three companions – Daria, Daria and Maria, the new Martyrs of Puza. It describes the topography of the “Shrines of Dunyushka”, the ideas of local residents about the manifestation of grace at different loci and objects of those shrines, as well as the practice of using (appropriation) of grace at those shrines. For that purpose, in the first part of the article, several concepts are introduced and justified: a complex shrine, the path the saint (via sancti), widespread grace and the second invisible “body” of the saint. A complex shrine is a network, a “constellation” of shrines united by the grace of the righteous. Its elements (natural or man-made) can be located at a considerable distance from each other, these are the most important places of the saint’s lifetime and posthumous stay. The topography of the complex shrine and pilgrimage routes is formed by the grace spread by the ascetic moving in space or his relics. Such a dynamic state of the shrine is considered as the second “body” of the saint, who invisibly resides on earth. In that aspect, the second part of the article considers not so much the topography as the dynamics of the existence and development of the “Shrinesof Dunyushka”, based on the manifestation and appropriation of grace emanating from them. In different historical epochs, the significance of different loci of the complex “Shrines of Dunyushka” (cell, grave, church with relics) as a center of religious practices and manifestations of grace has changed.
About the Authors
D. Yu. DoroninRussian Federation
Dmitrii Yu. Doronin
Bld. 6, Miusskaya Sq., Moscow, 125047; bld. 82, Vernadskiy Av., Moscow, 119606A. I. Zavyalova
Russian Federation
Anastasiya I. Zav’yalova – student.
Bld. 6, Miusskaya Sq., Moscow, 125047
References
1. Antonov, D.I. (2018), “Two ‘bodies’ of the icon. Communication with the sacred image as an Appropriation of Power”, RSUH/ RGGU Bulletin. “History. Philology. Cultural Studies. Oriental Studies” Series, no. 7, pp. 9–34.
2. Antonov, D.I. (2021), “Appropriation of Power. The invisible ‘body’ of the Shrine in Christian traditions”, Gosudarstvo, religiia, tserkov’ v Rossii i za rubezhom, vol. 39, no. 3, pp. 7–25.
3. Antonov, D.I. (2022), “The Appropriation of Power and the invisible ‘body’ of the Shrine. Studies of current religious practices in post-Soviet Russia”, Zhivaya starina, no. 1, pp. 20–21.
4. Doronin, D.Yu. (2022), “The Shrine as a semiotic complex. Widespread virtue”, Zhivaya starina, no. 1, pp. 33–38.
5. Doronin, D.Yu. and Zav’yalova, A.I. (2022), “Widespread virtue. Texts and comments”, Zhivaya starina, no. 1, pp. 39–43.
6. Kormina, Zh.V. (2019), Palomniki: Etnograficheskie ocherki pravoslavnogo nomadizma [Pilgrims. Ethnographic essays in Orthodox Nomadism], Izdatel’skii dom Vysshei shkoly ekonomiki, Moscow, Russia.
7. Lipatova, A.P. (2018), “Sacred geography as a system. The question of the status of a sacred object”, Nauchnyi dialog, no. 11, pp. 103–112.
8. Lipatova, A.P. (2018), “Sacred geography of the Ulyanovsk river Sura region (Prisur’ye)”, Traditsionnaya kul’tura, vol. 19, no. 5, pp. 154–165.
9. Moroz, A.B. (2015), “Sacred places in urban and rural space: traditional and new prac-tices”, in Ahmetova, M.V. and Petrov, N.V. (ed.), Situatsiya postfol’klora: gorodskie teksty i praktiki [The situation of post-folklore. Urban texts and practices], Forum, Moscow, Russia, pp. 89–100.
10. Panchenko, A.A. (2019) “ ‘Local shrines’. ‘Material religion’, Agency and mediality”, Etnograficheskoe obozrenie, no. 6, pp. 108–112.
11. Platonov, E.V. (2007), “Sacred topography of villages in the lower reaches of the Shelon River (studies in the district of the former Ilmen, Rethen and Sknyatinsky churchyards)”, Antropologicheskii forum, no. 7, pp. 231–280.
12. Shchepanskaya, T.B. (1995), “Crisis Network (traditions of spiritual exploration of space)”, in Bernshtam, T.A. (ed.), Russkii Sever: K probleme lokal’nykh grupp. Vyp. 5. [Russian North. On the issue of local groups, vol. 5], MAE RAN, Saint Petersburg, Russia, pp. 110–176.
13. Shevarenkova, Yu.M. (2010), “Modern stories about the mystery of the relics of Seraphim of Sarov”, Zhivaya starina, no. 4, pp. 11–13.
14. Shevarenkova, Yu.M. (2012), “New Martyr Dunyushka Suvorovskaya. Oral and book hagiography”, Zhivaya starina, no. 1, pp. 11–14.
15. Shevarenkova, Yu.M. (2017), “New Martyr Evdokia Suvorovskaya. On the question of the oral and written life of the Saint”, Proceedings of the conference “The Life of Province. History and Present”, 11–12 November 2016, Nizhnii Novgorod, Russia, pp. 124–133.
16. Suykerbuyk, R. (2020), The matter of piety Zoutleeuw’s Church of Saint Leonard and religious material culture in the Low Countries, 1450–1620, Brill, Leiden, Boston, USA.
17. Vinogradov, V.V. (2019), Severorusskie pochitaemye mesta: topika svyatyn’: izbrannye stat’i, dissertatsiya [North Russian revered places. The topic of Shrines. Selected articles, dissertation], Proppovskii tsentr, Saint Petersburg, Russia.
Review
For citations:
Doronin D.Yu., Zavyalova A.I. The cell, the grave and the church. The spread and appropriation of grace in the topography of Dunyushka’s shrine. RSUH/RGGU Bulletin: “Literary Teory. Linguistics. Cultural Studies”, Series. 2022;(4):110-141. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.28995/2686-7249-2022-4-110-141