Incarnation of meaning in a dramatic work
https://doi.org/10.28995/2686-7249-2022-6-39-48
Abstract
The object of research in the proposed article is the semantic organization of a dramatic work. The subject of the study is the peculiarities of updating the meaning in a dramatic work, due to its generic specifics. The specifics of artistic meaning are described in this article with the concept of incarnation (implementation). At the same time, the article reveals not theological, but aesthetic (based on the works of Bakhtin of the 1920s) and the hermeneutic content of the above concept. The article focuses on identifying the generic features of incarnation of meaning in works of both classical and modern drama. The scientific novelty of the article is determined by the fact that for the first time (through the concept of incarnation) it reveals the generic features of updating the meaning in a dramatic work, namely: 1) emphasis on the process of transition of the meaning of the characters’ being from the mode of possibility to the mode of reality; 2) placing in the center of the world of drama a character who is in a situation of making a choice of his own life meaning from a range of possible options for its implementing; 3) artistic understanding of the characters life as a limited horizon for the implementation of semantic possibilities, as indicated by the specifics of the image of time (as conditional “now”, unfinished present) and space (as limited and visible conditional “here”); 4) in a non-classical drama, the connection of incarnation of meaning with the image of characters throwing “their being at opportunity” (Heidegger) is mainly not in the space of interpersonal communication, but in the spheres of consciousness and/or language.
About the Author
Yu. V. PodkovyrinRussian Federation
Yurii V. Podkovyrin, Cand. of Sci. (Philology), associate professor
bld. 6, Miusskaya Square, Moscow, 125047;
bldg. E, bld. 80, Lenigradskii Avenue, Moscow
References
1. Bakhtin, M.M. (2003), Sobranie sochinenii v 7 t. [Collected works in 7 vols.], vol. 1, Russkie slovari, Yazyki slavyanskoi kul’tury, Moscow, Russia.
2. Broitman, S.N. (2004), Teoriya literatury [Theory of Literature], in 2 vols., vol. 2, Akademiya, Moscow, Russia.
3. Davydova, E.M. (2010), “Receptive strategies in drama”, RSUH/RGGU Bulletin. “History. Philology. Cultural studies. Oriental studies” Series, no. 2, pp. 15–27.
4. Fukson, L.Yu. (2003), “Hermeneutic parameters of reading a literary work”, Tamarchenko, N.D. (ed.) Literaturnoe proizvedenie: teoriya i praktika analiza [A literary work. theory and practice of analysis], iss. 2, Kemerovo, Russia, pp. 157–184.
5. Fukson, L.Yu. (2008), “Value structure [of a literary work]”, Tamarchenko, N.D. (ed.) Poetika: slovar’ aktual’nykh terminov i ponyatii [Poetics. Dictionary of Current Terms and Concepts], Izd-vo Kulaginoi, Intrada, Moscow, Russia, pp. 290–292.
6. Fyodorov, V.V. (1984), O prirode poeticheskoi real’nosti [On the nature of poetic reality], Sovetskii pisatel’, Moscow, Russia.
7. Gachev, G. (2008), Soderzhatel’nost’ khudozhestvennykh form. Epos. Lirika. Teatr [Meaningfulness of artistic forms. Epic. Lyrics. Theatre], Izd-vo Moskovskogo unta, Moscow, Russia.
8. Gadamer, H.-G. (1988), Istina i metod [Truth and method], Bessonov, B.N. (transl. from German, ed.), Progress, Moscow, Russia.
9. Kostelyanets, B.O. (2007), Drama i deistvie [Drama and action], Sovpadenie, Moscow, Russia.
10. Marcel, G. (2004), Opyt konkretnoi filosofii [Experience of specific philosophy], Bol’shakov, V.P. and Vizgin, V.P. (transl. from French), Respublika, Moscow, Russia.
11. Pavlov, A.M. (2018), “Features of the subject structure of the monodrama and the position of the reader/viewer”, New Philological Bulletin, no. 1 (44), pp. 28–38.
12. Podkovyrin, Yu.V. (2012), “The concept of ‘incarnation’ in the philosophy of the 20th century and the phenomenon of the meaning of a literary work”, Philology. Theory & Practice, no. 6 (17), pp. 137–142.
13. Podkovyrin, Yu.V. (2019), “The main qualities of incarnation of artistic meaning. On the example of the interpretation of M.Yu. Lermontov’s poem ‘Homeland’ ”, The New Philological Bulletin, no. 3 (50), pp. 102–113.
14. Tamarchenko, N.D. (2008), “World of characters”, Tamarchenko, N.D. (ed.), Poetika: slovar’ aktual’nykh terminov i ponyatii [Poetics. Dictionary of Current Terms and Concepts], Izd-vo Kulaginoi; Intrada, Moscow, Russia, pp. 122–123.
15. Zhurcheva, O.V. (2010), “Receptive strategies in the latest drama”, GoncharovaGrabovskaya S.Yu. (ed.), Russkaya i belorusskaya literatury na rubezhe XX–XXI vv.: sbornik nauchnykh state [Russian and Belarusian literature at the turn of the 20th– 21st centuries. collection of scientific articles], in 2 parts, part 1, RIVSH, Minsk, Belarus.
Supplementary files
For citation: Podkovyrin Y.V. Incarnation of meaning in a dramatic work. RSUH/RGGU Bulletin: “Literary Teory. Linguistics. Cultural Studies”, Series. 2022;(6):39-48. https://doi.org/10.28995/2686-7249-2022-6-39-48
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.