Typological features of the category of person in Russian grammar. Expansion into syntax, maximum activity of subjectless sentences in Slavia, variety of unreal modalities


https://doi.org/10.28995/2686-7249-2022-8-24-45

Full Text:




Abstract

The restructuring in the system of verb tenses, which took place in the separate history of the Slavic languages, led in a number of languages to the loss of grammatical person indicators s in some predicative models and to the activation of impersonal and subjectless sentences. If in the Proto-Slavic and Old Russian languages in all forms of the past tenses the meaning of the person was present, then in the Russian language, in place of the four past tenses, one perfect was preserved, in which the link present time from the verb *byti, which explicitly expressed the meaning of the person, was gradually lost. The linguistic consciousness of the speakers got used to the indistinctness of the grammatical person, which led to the emergence of structurally diverse and widely used non-subjective sentences. According to the repertoire of models of subjectless sentences, the Slavic languages are close to each other, but differ in the activity of the models. The occurrence of infinitive and mononuclear sentences with a verbal predicate in the 2nd person singular increases in the direction from Slovenian to Polish and further to Russian. In the aspect of areal-diachronic differences between the Slavic languages, the considered facts show that in the direction from west to east (from Slovene to Polish and further to Russian) there is a typological tendency to weaken the inflectional nature of the grammatical category of a person and to blur the basic meanings of a person.

About the Author

N. B. Mechkovskaya
Belarusian State University
Belarus

Nina B. Mechkovskaya, Dr. of Sci. (Philology), professor

bld. 4, Independence Av., Minsk, 220030

 


References

1. Bojc, E. (1980), Pregovori in reki na Slovenskem, 2. izdaja, Ljubljana, Poland.

2. Borkovskii, V.I. (1983) (ed.), Struktura predlozheniya v istorii vostochnoslavyanskikh yazykov [Sentence structure in the history of East Slavic languages, Nauka, Moscow, USSR.

3. Bulakhovs’kii, L.A. (1951) (ed.), Kurs suchasnoї ukraїns’koї literaturnoї movi. T. 2: Sintaksis (1. Proste rechennya, 2. Skladne rechennya, 3. Punktuaciya) [Course of modern Ukrainian literary language. Vol. 2: Syntax (1. Simple sentence, 2. Complex sentence, 3. Punctuation], Radyans’ka shkola, Kiev, USSR.

4. Ermakova, O.P. and Zemskaya, E.A. (1993), “On the construction of a typology of communicative failures (on the natural Russian dialogue)”, in Russkii yazyk v ego funkcionirovanii [Russian дanguage in its functioning], Nauka, Moscow, Russia, pp. 30–64.

5. Greenberg, J.H. (ed.) (1963), Universals of language. Report of a conference held at Dobbs Ferry, New York, April, 13–15, 1961, Cambridge Mass., USA.

6. Gvozdev, A.N. (1961), Voprosy izucheniya detskoj rechi [Questions of studying children’s speech], APN RSFSR, Moscow, Russia.

7. Klemensiewicz, Z. (1961), Historia języka polskiego. Część I. Doba staropolska (od czasów najdawniejszych do początków XVI wieku), PWN, Warszawa, Poland.

8. Mechkovskaya, N.B. (1991), Slovenskij yazyk [Slovenian language], Universitetskoe, Minsk, Belarus.

9. Mechkovskaya, N.B. (1999), “Impersonality, uncertainty and generalization of a person in the structure of the category of personality”, in Jachnow, H., Mečkovskaja, N., Norman, B. and B. Plotnikov (eds.), Personalität und Person, Harrasowitz, Wiesbaden, Germany, S. 97–124. (=Slavistische Studienbücher, Neue Folge, Bd. 9)

10. Peshkovskii, A.M. ([1928] 1956), Russkii sintaksis v nauchnom osveshchenii [Russian syntax from a scientific point of view], Uchpedgiz, Moscow, USSR.

11. Revzina, O.G. (1973), “General theory of grammatical categories”, in Strukturnotipologicheskie issledovaniya v oblasti grammatiki slavyanskikh yazykov [Structuraltypological researches in the field of grammar of the Slavic languages], Nauka, Moscow, pp. 5–38.

12. Shakhmatov, A.A. (1941), Sintaksis russkogo yazyka [Syntax of the Russian language], Gosuchpedgiz, Leningrad, USSR.

13. Shvedova, N.Yu. (ed.) (1970), Grammatika sovremennogo russkogo literaturnogo yazyka [Grammar of the modern Russian literary language], Nauka, Moscow, USSR.

14. Shvedova, N.Yu. (ed.) (1980), Russkaya grammatika. T. 2: Sintaksis [Russian grammar. Vol. 2. Syntax], Nauka, Moscow, USSR.

15. Slin’ko, I.I., Gujvanyuk, N.V. and Kobilyans’ka, M.F. (1994), Sintaksis suchasnoï ukraïns’koï movi: Problemni pitannya [Syntax of the modern Ukrainian language. Problematic issues], Vishcha shkola, Kiev, Ukraine.

16. Tikhomirova, T.S. (1978), Pol’skii yazyk. Grammaticheskii ocherk, literaturnye teksty s kommentariem i slovarem [Polish. Grammatical essay, literary texts with commentary and dictionary], Izdatel’stvo Moskovskogo universiteta, Moscow, Russia. Polish language. Grammatical essay.

17. Toporišič, J. (1976), Slovenska slovnica, Maribor, Slovenia.

18. Toporišič, J. (1992), Enciklopedija slovenskega jezika, Ljubljana, Slovenia.

19. Val’ter, Kh. and Mokienko, V.M. (2005), Antiposlovicy russkogo naroda [Anti-proverbs of the Russian people], Neva, Sankt-Petersburg, Russia.

20. Vinogradov, V.V. (1947), Russkii yazyk: Grammaticheskoe uchenie o slove [Russian language: Grammatical doctrine of the word], Uchpedgiz, Moscow, Leningrad, USSR.

21. Volodin, A.P. (1990), “Person”, in Lingvisticheskii entsiklopedicheskii slovar’ [Linguistic dictionary], Sovetskaya entsiklopediya, Moscow, Russia, pp. 271–272.


Supplementary files

For citation: Mechkovskaya N.B. Typological features of the category of person in Russian grammar. Expansion into syntax, maximum activity of subjectless sentences in Slavia, variety of unreal modalities. RSUH/RGGU Bulletin: “Literary Teory. Linguistics. Cultural Studies”, Series. 2022;(8-1):24-45. https://doi.org/10.28995/2686-7249-2022-8-24-45

Views: 134

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2073-6355 (Print)