Pragmatics of personal pronouns in the structures of pronoun complexes and dialog unities
https://doi.org/10.28995/2686-7249-2022-8-111-135
Abstract
The article is devoted to pronoun complexes on the base of personal pronouns, which at present traditionally are not usually singled out as autonomic language units. Nevertheless many things indicate their particular status in the vocabulary as well as in lexical system. So this way the status of such formation (created on the base of personal pronouns) as the units of the speech are confirmed by constancy of their function’s spheres, the connection to communication’s situation, frequency of their use and by some other factors. Among the analyzed units in the article are presented pronoun complexes on the base of pronoun subject, units of symbolic character, popular expressions (pithy sayings), phraseology of syntactical type etc. There is marked the role of units of such kind for the stylistic shape of speech and their value in the connection to ethnolinguistic tradition. There is underlined that such pronoun units’ inscription to dictionaries as a standing by itself vocables or subvocables are mostly expedient and advisable. There is used also comparison stratum of lexis – functional correspond units from the near related Slavic area.
About the Author
V. G. Kulpina
Lomonosov Moscow State University
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Valentina G. Kulpina, Dr. of Sci. (Philology), assistant professor
bldg. 13, bld. 1, Leninskiye Gory, Moscow, 119991
References
1. Bogusławski, A. i Wawrzyńczyk, J. (1993), Polszczyzna jaką znamy. Nowa sonda słownikowa, Uniwersytet Warszawski, Warszawa, Poland.
2. Ermakova, O.P. (2018), Mestoimeniya v russkom yazyke [Pronouns in Russian language], FLINTA, Nauka, Moscow, Russia.
3. Horálek, K. (ed.) (1979), Russkaya grammatika [Russian grammar], vol. 1, Academia, Praha, Czeckoslovakia.
4. Kibrik, A.A., Sidorova, E.V. (2013), “Where from have we got the subject pronoun in Russia?”, in Remneva, M.L. (ed.), Slavyanskie yazyki v sinkhronii i diakhronii: materialy Mezhdunarodnoi nauchnoi konferencii, Moscow, MGU imeni M.V. Lomonosova, Filologicheskij fakul’tet, 26–28 noyabrya 2013 g., [Slavic languages in synchronicity and diachronicity. Proceedings of the International Scientific Conference., Lomonosov Moscow State University, faculty of philology, Moscow, November 26–28, 2013], MAKS Press, Moscow, Russia, pp. 167–169.
5. Kul’pina, V.G. (2009), “The contemporary tendencies in lexicographic presentation of pronoun class (on the material оf Polish and Russian languages)”, in Yazyk, soznanie, kommunikaciya [Language, consciousness, communication], no. 38, MAKS Press, Moscow, Russia, pp. 124–134.
6. Kul’pina, V.G. (2012), “Variability of locative constructions as an indicator of linguistically and ethnically determined categorization of the world”, in Fedorova, L.V. (ed.), Variativnost’ v yazyke i kommunikacii [Variability in language and communication], RGGU, Moscow, Russia, pp. 85–98.
7. Kul’pina, V.G. (2016), “The Japanese forms of politeness’ theory of V.M. Alpatov as a heuristic base of parameterization of speech etiquette in Slavic languages”, in Shalyapina, Z.M. (ed.), Problemy obshchei i vostokovednoi lingvistiki – 2016: Yazyk. Obshchestvo. Istoriya nauki: K 70-letiyu chlena-korrespondenta RAN V.M. Alpatova: Trudy nauchnoi konferencii Instituta vostokovedeniya RAN 22–23 aprelya 2015 g. [Issues of general and Oriental linguistic – 2016. Language. Society. History of science. On the 70th anniversary of V.M. Alpatov, associate member of the Russian Academy of Sciences. Proceedings of the Scientific Conference of the Institute of Oriental Studies of the Russian Academy of Sciences, April 22–23, 2015], Institut vostokovedeniya RAN, Moscow, Russia, pp. 23–45.
8. Melikyan, V.Yu., Melikyan, A.V. and Posidelova, V.V. (2021), “The grammar of constructions vs. syntactic phraseology”, Voprosy kognitivnoi lingvistiki, no. 2, pp. 46–64.
9. Norman, B.Yu. (2018), Kognitivnyi sintaksis russkogo yazyka [The cognitive syntax of Russian language], FLINTA, Nauka, Moscow, Russia.
10. Plungyan, V.A. (2000), Obshchaya morfologiya: vvedenie v problematiku [General morphology. Introduction to problematics], URSS, Moscow, Russia.
11. Rittel, T. (1985), Kategoria osoby w polskim zdaniu, Państwowe Wydawnictwo, Warsaw, Kraków, Poland.
12. Rudzka-Ostyn, B. (2000), Z rozważań nad kategorią przypadka, Uniwersitas, Kraków, Poland.
13. Sharonov, I.A. (2016), “Discursive words and communicatives”, Komp’yuternaya lingvistika i intellektual’nye tekhnologii: po materialam mezhdunarodnoj konferencii “Dialog–2016”, Moscow, Russia, 1–4 iyunya 2016 g., available at: https://www. dialog-21.ru/media/3423/sharonovia.pdf (Accessed 26 May 2022).
14. Shvedova, N.Yu. (ed.) (1980), Russkaya grammatika [Russian grammar], vol. 1, Akademiya nauk SSSR, Nauka, Moscow, Russia.
15. Velichko, A.V. (2016), Predlozheniya frazeologizirovannoi struktury v russkom yazyke. Strukturno-semanticheskoe i funkcional’no-kommunikativnoe issledovanie [The sentences of phraseological structure in Russian language. Structural, semantic, functional and communicative study], MAKS Press, Moscow, Russia.
Review
For citations:
Kulpina V.G. Pragmatics of personal pronouns in the structures of pronoun complexes and dialog unities. RSUH/RGGU Bulletin: “Literary Teory. Linguistics. Cultural Studies”, Series. 2022;(8-1):111-135. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.28995/2686-7249-2022-8-111-135
Views:
119
Email this article 