Preview

RSUH/RGGU Bulletin: “Literary Teory. Linguistics. Cultural Studies”, Series

Advanced search

Group identity of the Molokans of Moscow and the Kryashens of Kazan: experience of comparative analysis (based on feld reasearch)

https://doi.org/10.28995/2686-7249-2022-7-48-62

Abstract

The article compares group identities of communities of the Molokans of Moscow and the Kryashens of Kazan. I use R. Jenkins’ ideas on sufcient conditions for the formation of a group, E. Erikson’s description and definition of identity together with the concept of “textual communities” by B. Stock as a type of groups to understand the specifcity of group self-identifcation of Molokans of Moscow and Kryashens of Kazan communities. Drawing upon a thematic analysis of feld research data (interviews with members of Molokans of Moscow and Kryashens of Kazan), I make it clear that their identities can be characterized as the identities of textual communities (which is indicated by the presence of life-defning texts and attentive attitudes to them). Besides that, results of the research showed other features, expressed by the communities’ members during their self-description. There are similarities between the communities among them: perception of texts defning the communities’ lifestyles; early religious involvement since childhood and via families; attending church/religious assemblies; pronounced religious tolerance. There are also differences: choosing the role of a family member as a key social role for an individual is typical among the Kryashens while fnding a universal key social role among the Molokans is hardly possible. There are specifc elements too: a deeper interest to religion appears in later periods of life among the Molokans; the role of church and ethnicness is more important among the Kryashens.

About the Author

G. I. Kornilov
Russian State University for the Humanities
Russian Federation

Gleb I. Kornilov, postgraduate student

bld. 6, Miusskaya Square, Moscow, 125047



References

1. Busygina, N.P. (2018), Kachestvennye I kolichestvennye metody issledovanii v psikhologii [Qualitative and Quantitative methods of Research in Psychology], Yurait, Moscow, Russia.

2. Erikson, E.H. (1996), Identichnost’: yunost’ I krizis [Identity: Youth and Crisis], transl. from English, Progress, Moscow, Russia.

3. Il’in, V.I. (2006), Dramaturgiya kachestvennogo polevogo issledovaniya [The Dramaturgy of a Qualitative Field Research], Intersotsis, Saint Petersburg, Russia.

4. Iskhakov, R.R. (2017a), Consolidational Processes and Formation of the Kryashen Ethnoreligious Identity”, Istoriya i kul’tura tatar-kryashen (XVI–XX vv.) [History and Culture of Kryashen Tatars (16–20th centuries): A Collective Monograph], Institut istorii im. Sh. Mardzhani AN RT, Kazan, Russia, pp. 206–207.

5. Iskhakov, R.R. (2017b), “The Development of Confessional Education of Baptized Tatars”, Istoriya i kul’tura tatar-kryashen (XVI–XX vv.) [History and Culture of Kryashen Tatars (16–20th centuries): A Collective Monograph], Institut istorii im. Sh. Mardzhani AN RT, Kazan, Russia, pp. 189–210.

6. Iskhakov, R.R. (2017c), “The System of N.I. Ilminsky and Formation of the Kryashen Intelligentsia”, Istoriya i kul’tura tatar-kryashen (XVI–XX vv.) [History and Culture of Kryashen Tatars (16–18th centuries): A Collective Monograph], Institut istorii im. SH. Mardzhani AN RT, Kazan, Russia, pp. 283–294.

7. Islaev, F.G. (2017), Obrashchenie v pravoslavie i khristianizatsiya tatar v XVIII v. [Conversion to the Orthodoxy and Christianization of Tatars in the 18th century], Istoriya i kul’tura tatar-kryashen (XVI–XX vv.), kollektivnaya monografya [History and Culture of Kryashen Tatars (16–20th centuries): A Collective Monograph], Institut istorii im. Sh. Mardzhani AN RT, Kazan, Russia.

8. Jenkins, R. (2008), Social identity, Routledge.

9. Kefeli, A. (2001), “The Role of Tatar and Kriashen Women in the Transmission of Islamic Knowledge, 1800–1870”, Geraci, R. and Khodarkovsky, M. (eds.), Of Religion and Empire: Missions, Conversion, and Tolerance in Tsarist Russia, Cornell University Press, Ithaca, NY, pp. 250–273.

10. L’vov, A.L. (2011), Sokha i Pyatiknizhie: russkie iudeistvuyushchie kak tekstual’noe soobshchestvo [The Plow and the Pentateuch: Russian Judaizers as a Textual Community], Izdatel’stvo Evropeiskogo universiteta v Sankt-Peterburge, Saint Petersburg, Russia.

11. Pronina, T.S. (2015), “Religious identity as a psychosocial phenomenon”, Vestnik Russkoi khristianskoi gumanitarnoi akademii, vol. 16, iss. 2, pp. 154–166.

12. Smilyanskaya, E. (2016), Volshebniki, bogokhul’niki, eretiki v setyakh rossiiskogo syska XVIII veka [Wizards, Blasphemers, Heretics in the Nets of the Russian Investigation Service of the 18th century], Lomonosov, Moscow, Russia.

13. Stock, B. (1983), The Implications of Literacy: Written Language and Models of Interpretation in the 11th and 12th Centuries, Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ, USA.

14. Zagidullin, I.K. (2017), “Religious Politics of the Muscovite State in the Middle Volga Region (the 2nd half of the 16–18th centuries)”, Istoriya i kul’tura tatar-kryashen (XVI–KHKH vv.) [History and Culture of Kryashen Tatars (16–18th centuries):A Collective Monograph], Institut istorii im. SH. Mardzhani AN RT, Kazan, Russia, pp. 74–143.


Review

For citations:


Kornilov G.I. Group identity of the Molokans of Moscow and the Kryashens of Kazan: experience of comparative analysis (based on feld reasearch). RSUH/RGGU Bulletin: “Literary Teory. Linguistics. Cultural Studies”, Series. 2022;(7):48-62. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.28995/2686-7249-2022-7-48-62

Views: 168


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2073-6355 (Print)