Intertextual level in the structure of a linguistic personality as a native speaker of a dialogical linguistic ability
https://doi.org/10.28995/2686-7249-2022-8-240-252
Abstract
The article is devoted to the reconstruction of the intertextual level in the model of a linguistic personality as a native speaker of dialogical language ability. The authors proceed from the understanding that the model of a linguistic personality includes the following levels: the level of superficial understanding of a speech work and its selection for the creation of a response text, interpretative, modus and intertextual levels. The intertextual level is considered as the level of generation of a speech product created in a response situation. Intertextuality in this case is interpreted as a dialogical interaction of texts with each other, as evidenced by the presence of various “alien” elements in the created speech work. The units of description of this level are intertexts taken from the original speech utterance or from any other texts. The factual material is the responses of one native speaker published on the portal of the Bankfax news agency. Reconstruction of the intertextual level in the structure of the linguistic personality as a carrier of dialogic language ability shows that absolutely all the response speech works created by one native speaker contain “echoes and echoes” (according to M.M. Bakhtin) of “foreign” texts. In this study, these are words corresponding to certain genres, proverbs and sayings, stable expressions from various spheres of speech interaction.
Keywords
dialogic language ability,
intertexteme,
intertextuality,
language personality,
structure of language personality
Supporting agencies: The article was made within the framework of the grant of the President of the Russian Federation for young scientists – doctors of sciences MD- 3824.2021.2.
About the Authors
N. N. Shpil’naya
Altai State Pedagogical University
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Nadezhda N. Shpil’naya, Dr. of Sci. (Philology), associate professor
bld. 55, Molodezhnaya St., Barnaul, 656031
E. N. Skubieva
Altai State University
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Elena N. Skubieva
bld. 61, Lenina Av., Barnaul, 656038
References
1. Bakhtin, M.M. (1979), Estetika slovesnogo tvorchestva [Aesthetics of verbal creativity], Moscow, Russia.
2. Bakhtin, M.M. (1997), Sobranie sochinenii v 7 tomakh. T. 5: Raboty 1940 – nachala 1960- kh gg.) [Collected works in 7 volumes, vol. 5: Works of the 1940s – early 1960s], Russkie slovari, Moscow, Russia
3. Eremenko, E.G. (2012), “Intertextuality, intertext and main intertextual forms in literature”, Ural’skii filologicheskii vestnik, no. 6, pp. 130–140.
4. Fateeva, N.A. (1998), “Typology of intertextual elements and connections in artistic speech”, in Izvestiya Akademii nauk, seriya “Literatura i yazykoznaniye” [Proceedings of the Academy of Sciences. Literature and Language Series], vol. 57, no. 5, pp. 25–38.
5. Manyapova, T.K. (2010), “System-forming foundations of intertextuality”, Vestnik Permskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta, no. 2, pp. 78–84.
6. Pindosova, T.S. (2019), “The category of intertextuality in D. Brown’s literary texts: pragmalinguistic aspect”, Ph.D. Thesis, Philology, Kherson State University, Kherson, Ukraine.
7. Shpil’naya, N.N. (2019), “The principle of dialogism and its explanatory potential in describing the lexical system of the Russian language”, in Shpil’naya, N.N. (ed.), Dialogicheskaya lingvistika [Dialogical linguistics], Izdatel’stvo AltGPU, Barnaul, Russia, pp. 7–22.
8. Sidorenko, K.P. (1999), Intertekstovye svyazi pushkinskogo slova [Intertext links of the Pushkin word], Saint Petersburg, Russia.
9. Skubieva, E.N. (2021), “Model of dialogic linguistic personality of Internet communication participant”, in Lingvometodicheskaya shkola v respublike Tatarstan: istoriya i sovremennost’: sbornik statei Mezhdunarodnoi nauchno-prakticheskoi konferentsii (Kazan’, 16–17 fevralya 2021 g.) [International Scientific and Practical Conference Linguistic Methodological School in the Republic of Tatarstan: past and present, Kazan’ 16–17 February], Kazan’, Russia, pp. 148–153.
10. Sukhikh, S.A. (1998), “Pragmalinguistic dimension of the communication process”, D.Sc. Thesis, Philology, Kuban State University, Krasnodar, Russia.
11. Yakubinskii, L.P. (1986), O dialogicheskoi rechi [About dialogical speech], Nauka, Moscow, Russia.
Review
For citations:
Shpil’naya N.N., Skubieva E.N. Intertextual level in the structure of a linguistic personality as a native speaker of a dialogical linguistic ability. RSUH/RGGU Bulletin: “Literary Teory. Linguistics. Cultural Studies”, Series. 2022;1(8-2):240-252. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.28995/2686-7249-2022-8-240-252
Views:
117
Email this article 