Preview

RSUH/RGGU Bulletin: “Literary Teory. Linguistics. Cultural Studies”, Series

Advanced search

Taarof in Iranian speech etiquette

https://doi.org/10.28995/2686-7249-2022-8-299-316

Abstract

The article is devoted to the problems of correlation between models of etiquette behavior in Iranian and Russian communicative cultures. We focus on the attention in the article is paid to taarof – the system of etiquette behavior in Persian culture. Taarof plays a fundamentally important role in the life of modern Iranian society and in the communicative interaction of Iranians with foreigners. The article deals with the main postulates of the theory of politeness and the problems of national specifics of speech etiquette in Persian culture. The crucial point for Persian culture is the concept of ceremony, ritualized behavior in everyday communication. Ritualized communication also existed in the patriarchal Russian society, however, modern Russian everyday etiquette has largely lost the features of ceremonial and has become less formal. In the article, we analyze real everyday conversations of Persian culture. We list important characteristics of the ceremonial nature of everyday communication in Iran. There are two situations of an unexpected meeting and a related invitation to visit to be considered. What we are interested in is the stereotypical invitation and refusal formulas, which are idiomatic and figurative. We plan to describe the pragmatic nature of the etiquette formulas of Taarof and to compile the Russian-Iranian dictionary of speech etiquette in future.

About the Author

F. A. Beni
Russian State University for the Humanities
Russian Federation

Fatemeh Ahmadi Beni, postgraduate student

bld. 6, Miusskaya Sq., Moscow, 125047



References

1. Alirezaei, Sh. (2008), Taarof in Iranian culture: master’s thesis, Tehran Center University, Tehran.

2. Beeman, W. (2002), Tongue. Dignity and power in Iran, Ney Publication, Tehran, Iran.

3. Brown, P. and Levinson, S. (1987), Politeness: some universals in language usage, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.

4. Formanovskaya, N.I. (1982), Russkii rechevoi etiket: linguisticheskii i metodicheskii aspekty [Russian speech etiquette. Linguistic and methodological aspects], Russkii yazyk, Moscow, Russia.

5. Formanovskaya, N.I. (2007), Rechevoye vzaimodeistviye: kommunikatsiya i pragmatika [Speech interaction: communication and pragmatics], IKAR, Moscow, Russia.

6. Hajiah, M. (2007), Etiquette of communication, Hani, Hamedan, Iran.

7. Izadi, A. (2018), “Exploring Iranian compliments”, Journal of Linguistic Research, no. 2, pp. 67–82.

8. Kadar, D.Z. (2013), Relational rituals and communication: ritual interaction in groups, Khiam, Tehran, Iran.

9. Kastler, L. (2004), “Negative and positive politeness: different strategies of speech interaction”, in Sharonov, I.A. (ed.), Agressiya v yazyke i rechi [Aggression in language and speech], RGGU, Moscow, Russia.

10. Kerbrat-Orecchioni, C. (2001), Speech acts in discourse. Theory and operation, Nathan, Paris, France.

11. Leech, G. (1983), Principles of pragmatics, Longman, London, UK, New York, USA.

12. Rathmair, R (2003), Pragmatika izvineniya [Pragmatics of an apology], Languages of Slavic culture, Moscow, Russia.

13. Sharonov, I. (2003), “A clash of etiquette. Ceremony and simplicity in communication”, Moscow linguistic journal, vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 151–175.

14. Soren, F. (2016), “Courtesy and compliments in Iran”, Journal of Iranian Studies, no. 1, pp. 105–124.

15. Tavernie, J.B. (1984), Travelogue of Tavernier, Sanai Library, Tehran, Iran.


Review

For citations:


Beni F.A. Taarof in Iranian speech etiquette. RSUH/RGGU Bulletin: “Literary Teory. Linguistics. Cultural Studies”, Series. 2022;1(8-2):299-316. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.28995/2686-7249-2022-8-299-316

Views: 205


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2073-6355 (Print)