Preview

RSUH/RGGU Bulletin: “Literary Teory. Linguistics. Cultural Studies”, Series

Advanced search

Changing points of view as a device in the texts of oral tradition. On the issue of the observer in folklore

https://doi.org/10.28995/2686-7249-2022-4-201-215

Abstract

The problem of the relationship between the narrator and the observer in the text has traditionally been considered in relation to the material of fiction. Analysis of folklore texts shows that the observer as a text category has a universal character. This position is also quite relevant for the texts of the oral tradition, and the most diverse genres. The article examines the position of the observer in mythological narratives (in the modern and archaic narrative tradition), in spells and in lyric song on the example of the use of grammatical forms of the 1st person in these texts. The focus of attention is such a feature of the observer in the text as the movement of his position, that is, the switching of this function between the subjects. The linguistic means used to express the observer’s position in folklore texts is the grammatical forms of the 1st person. The subject of observation can change throughout the text, while the expression of the observer’s position by the forms of the 1st person is carried out throughout the entire text, and this becomes possible by switching grammatical modes.

About the Author

V. A. Chervaneva
Russian State University for the Humanities
Russian Federation

Victoria A. Chervaneva,Cand. of Sci. (Philology), associate professor

bld. 6, Miusskaya Sq., Moscow, 125047

 


References

1. Adon’eva, S.B. (2004), Pragmatika fol’klora [The pragmatics of folklore], Saint Petersburg State University; Amfora, St. Petersburg, Russia.

2. Apresyan, Yu.D. (1995), Izbrannye trudy. T. 2: Integral’noe opisanie yazyka i sistemnaya leksikografiya [Selected works, vol. 2. Integral description of the language and systemic lexicography], Yazyki russkoi kul’tury, Moscow, Russia.

3. Artemenko, E.B. (1988), “Interaction of plans of presentation from the 1st and 3rd person in Russian folk lyrics and its artistic functions”, in Tarlanov, Z.K. (ed.), Yazyk russkogo fol’klora [The language of Russian folklore], Petrozavodsk State University, Petrozavodsk, USSR, pp. 25–33.

4. Artemenko, E.B. (1988), “Dialectics of presentation forms from the 1st and the 3rd person in the Russian folk lyric song”, in Chernukhina, I.Ya. (ed.), Struktura i semantika teksta [Structure and semantics of the text], Voronezh State University, Voronezh, USSR, pp. 130–138.

5. Artemenko, E.B. (1994), “ ‘The image of the author’ as a structure factor of the folklore text”, in Khrolenko, A.T. (ed.), Issledovaniya po lingvofol’kloristike. Vyp. 3 [Research on folklore language, vol. 3], Kursk State Pedagogical Institute, Kursk, Russia.

6. Artemenko, E.B. (1998), “On the problem of the narrator and his verbal representation in folklore. On a material of the epos”, Filologicheskie zapiski: Vestnik literaturovedeniia i iazykoznaniia, vol. 11, pp. 186–195.

7. Chervaneva, V.A. (2017), “Veracity limits of oral mythological narratives: done – seen – heard – happened”, Russkaya rech’, vol. 5, pp. 112–117.

8. Chervaneva, V.A. (2019), “Types of storyteller in mythological narrative”, in Dobrovolskaya, V.E. and Ippolitova, A.B. (comp.), 3 Vserossiiskii kongress fol’kloristov (Moskva, 3–7 fevralya 2014 g.): Sb. nauch. st. V 5 t. T. 4: Rossiiskaya fol’kloristika v XXI veke. Perspektivy razvitiya [3rd All-Russian Congress of Folklorists (Moscow, February 3–7, 2014): collection of scientific articles, in 5 volumes, vol. 4: Russian folklore in the 21st century. Development prospects], State Russian House of Folk Art named after V.D. Polenov, Moscow, Russia, pp. 12–22.

9. Chervaneva, V.A. (2019), “Deixis of oral mythological narratives: what are first person forms talking about?”, Shagi/Steps, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 36–52.

10. Levkievskaia, E.E. (2006), “Pragmatics of the mythological text”, in Tolstaia, S.M. (ed.), Slavianskii i balkanskii fol’klor, Vyp. 10: Semantika i pragmatika teksta [Slavic and Balkan folklore, vol. 10. Semantics and pragmatics of the text], Indrik, Moscow, Russia, pp. 150–214.

11. Levkievskaya, E.E. (2008), “Bylichka as a speech genre”, in Arkhipova, A.S., Gister, M.A. and Koz’min, A.V. (eds.), Kirpichiki: fol’kloristika i kul’turnaya antropologiya segodnya: Sbornik statei v chest’ 65-letiya S.Yu. Neklyudova i 40-letiya ego nauchnoi deyatel’nosti [Bricks: folkloristics and cultural anthropology today. Digest of articles in honor of the 65th anniversary of S.Yu. Neklyudov and the 40th anniversary of his scientific activity], Russian State University for the Humanities, Moscow, Russia, pp. 341–363.

12. Migunova, E.A. (2002), “On the question of the function of a mythological story”, in Bobrov, A.G., Danilova, I.F., Madlevskaia, E.L. and Khvorost’ianova, E.V. (eds.), Traditsionnye modeli v fol’klore, literature, iskusstve: v chest’ Natalii Mikhailovny Gerasimovoi [Traditional mModels in folklore, literature, art. In honor of Natalia Mikhailovna Gerasimova], Evropeiskii Dom, St. Petersburg, Russia, pp. 243–252.

13. Novik, E.S. (2012), “Modes of evidentiality and types of narrators in the archaic folklore of peoples of Siberia”, Russian Literature, vol. 71, no. 3–4, pp. 401–419.

14. Paducheva, E.V. (1995), “V.V. Vinogradov and science of language of literary prose”, Izvestiia RAN. Seriia literatury i iazyka, vol. 54, no. 3, pp. 39–48.

15. Paducheva, E.V. (1996), Semanticheskie issledovaniya. Semantika vremeni i vida v russkom jazyke. Semantika narrativa [Semantic research. Semantics of time and aspect in the Russian language. Semantics of narrative], Yazyki slavyanskoi kul’tury, Moscow, Russia.

16. Paducheva, E.V. (2018), Egotsentricheskie edinitsy yazyka [Egocentric units of language], Yazyki slavyanskoi kul’tury, Moscow, Russia.

17. Pomerantseva, E.V. (1968), “Genre features of Russian belief legends”, in Khrenov, I.A. (ed.), Istoriya, kul’tura, fol’klor i etnografiya slavyanskikh narodov. 6 Mezhdunarodnyi s’ezd slavistov (Praga, 1968). Doklady sovetskoi delegatsii [History, culture, folklore and ethnography of Slavic peoples. 6th International Congress of Slavists (Prague, 1968). Reports of the Soviet delegation], Nauka, Moscow, USSR, pp. 274–292.

18. Pomerantseva, E.V. (1985), Russkaya ustnaya proza [Russian oral prose], Prosveshchenie, Moscow, USSR.

19. Shmid, V. (2003), Narratologiya [Narratology], Yazyki slavyanskoi kul’tury, Moscow, Russia.

20. Tolstaya, S.M. (2017), “Communicative structure of folklore text (kolyadka, spell, proverb)”, in Tsykhun, G.A. and Zadvornaya, E.G. (rev.), Tekst v yazyke, rechi, kul’ture [Text in language, speech, culture], RIVSh, Minsk, Belarus, pp. 174–183.

21. Uspenskii, B.A. (1970), Poetika kompozitsii. Struktura khudozhestvennogo teksta i tipologiia kompozitsionnoi formy [Poetics of composition. The structure of a literary text and the typology of composition form], Iskusstvo, Moscow, USSR.

22. Veselova, I.S. (2003), “Pragmatics of oral story”, in Belousov, A.F., Veselova, I.S. and Neklyudov, S.Yu. (eds.), Sovremennyi gorodskoi fol’klor [Contemporary urban folklore], Russian State University for the Humanities, Moscow, Russia, pp. 234–244.

23. Veselova, I.S. and Stepanov, A.V. (2019), “Experience by roles. Percipient, confident and others (communicative foundations of the composition of mythological narratives of the Russian North”, RSUH/RGGU Bulletin. “Literary Theory. Linguistics. Cultural Studies” Series, vol. 4, pp. 10–24.

24. Vinogradov, V.V. (1936), “Style of ‘The Queen of Spades’ ”, in Vinogradov, V.V., Pushkin: Vremennik Pushkinskoi komissii AN SSSR. Institut literatury [Pushkin. Proceedings of the Pushkin Commission of the USSR Academy of Sciences. Institute of Literature], Academy of Sciences of the USSR, Moscow; Leningrad, USSR, pp. 74–147.

25. Zaliznyak, A.A. (2016), “Notes on the linguistic theory of narrative”, in Arutyunova, N.D. (ed.), Logicheskii analiz yazyka. Informatsionnaya struktura tekstov raznykh zhanrov i epokh [Logical analysis of language. Information structure of texts of different genres and eras], Gnozis, Moscow, Russia, pp. 8–24.

26. Zhennet, Zh. (1998), Figury [Figures], vol. 1–2, Publishing House Named after Sabashnikovs, Moscow, Russia.


Review

For citations:


Chervaneva V.A. Changing points of view as a device in the texts of oral tradition. On the issue of the observer in folklore. RSUH/RGGU Bulletin: “Literary Teory. Linguistics. Cultural Studies”, Series. 2022;(4(2)):201-215. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.28995/2686-7249-2022-4-201-215

Views: 133


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2073-6355 (Print)