Social spaces as necessity: a neuro-cognitive perspective
https://doi.org/10.28995/2686-7249-2022-4-348-354
Abstract
Every scientific institution is also a social space. To have worked in different institutions on different continents is both a challenge and a gift. In this personal report, a few experiences and observations are sketched which have been made in China, Russia, the United States, and Germany. The journey begins in Germany, to be exposed to research in ethology and biological rhythms. From there, it goes to the United States, where neuropsychology and neuroanatomy opened a new window. Early on, several doors opened to Russia, and the open doors were used for decades, enjoying interdisciplinary cognitive science. In China, intense cooperation started in the new millennium with the focus on visual attention, temporal processing, and neuroaesthetics. In spite of all the diversity in research topics, in spite of cultural differences, political systems, historical trajectories, there was always one strong belief that never should be given up: Scientists are natural ambassadors.
Supporting agencies: During the different phases of this report substantial material and spiritual support have been obtained from the Max-Planck-Society, the German Research Foundation, the Neurosciences Research Program of the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, the Federal Ministry of Research and Technology (Germany), the Parmenides Foundation, the Russian State University for the Humanities, the Chinese Academy of Sciences, and the Human Science Center of Ludwig Maximilian University Munich, which is gratefully acknowledged.
About the Author
E. Pöppel
Ludwig Maximilian University;
Peking University
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Ernst Pöppel, Dr. phil. (Psychology), Dr. med. habil. (Sensory Physiology); Guest professor at School of Psychological and Cognitive Sciences
bld. 31, Goethestrasse, Munich, 80336
bld. 5, Yiheyuan Road, Beijing, China, 100080
References
1. Aschoff, J. (1965), “Circadian rhythms in man”, Science, no. 148, pp. 1427–1432.
2. Bao, Y. and Pöppel, E. (2012), “Anthropological universals and cultural specifics: Conceptual and methodological challenges in cultural neuroscience”, Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews, no. 36, pp. 2143–2146.
3. Bao, Y., Zhang, D., Zhao, C., Pöppel, E. and Zabotkina, V. (2022), “An Aesthetic Frame for Three Modes of Knowing”, PsyCh Journal, no. 11, pp. 636–644.
4. Chen, L. (2005), “The topological approach to perceptual organization”, Visual Cognition, no. 12, pp. 553–637.
5. Kuhn, Th. (1962), The structure of scientific revolutions, University of Chicago Press, Chicago, USA.
6. Lorenz, K. (1943), “Die angeborenen Formen möglicher Erfahrung (Innate forms of possible experience)”, Zeitschrift für Tierpsychologie, no. 5, pp. 235–409.
7. Luria, A.R. (1973), The Working Brain. An Introduction to Neuropsychology, Basic Books, New York, NY, USA.
8. Nauta, W.J.H., Feirtag, M (1986), Fundamental Neuroanatomy. Freeman and Co., New York, NY, USA.
9. Podvigin, N.F., Bagaeva, T.V., Boykova, E.V., Zargarov, A.A., Podvigina, D.N. and Pöppel, E. (2004), “Three bands of oscillatory activity in the lateral geniculate nucleus of the cat visual system”, Neuroscience Letters, no. 361, pp. 83–85.
10. Pöppel, E. (1970), “Excitability cycles in central intermittency”, Psychologische Forschung, no. 34, pp. 1–9.
11. Pöppel, E. (1986), “Long-range colour-generating interactions across the retina”, Nature, no. 320, pp. 523–525.
12. Pöppel, E. (2018), “East of West, West of East: a matter of global and local identity”, Cognitive Processing, no. 19, pp. 115–119, doi.org/10.1007/s10339-018-0885-2.
13. Pöppel, E., Held, R. and Frost, D. (1973), “Residual visual function after brain wounds involving the central visual pathways in man”, Nature, no. 243, pp. 295–296.
14. Teuber, H.L. (1960), Perception. Handbook of physiology – Neurophysiology III, Springer Verlag, Germany, pp. 1595–1668.
15. Zhao, Ch., Enriquez, P., Izadifar, M., Pöppel, E., Bao, Y. and Zabotkina, V. (2022), “Complementarity of Mental Content and Logistic Algorithms in a Taxonomy of Cognitive Functions”, PsyCh Journal, no. 11 (2022), pp. 1–7.
Review
For citations:
Pöppel E. Social spaces as necessity: a neuro-cognitive perspective. RSUH/RGGU Bulletin: “Literary Teory. Linguistics. Cultural Studies”, Series. 2022;1(4(3)):348-354. https://doi.org/10.28995/2686-7249-2022-4-348-354
Views:
112
Email this article 