.png)
.png)
Email this article 
On the separate (heterogeneity) existence of three types of verbal thinking: practical, technical and theoretical
https://doi.org/10.28995/2686-7249-2022-4-378-391
Abstract
The main meaning of the noun is presented in the article in the form of an ontoconcept – a hierarchy of three “age” concepts that are consistently formed in a child during his development. The process of formation of a specific ontoconcept CHAIR is considered in detail. At first (in 2–3 years), the child has the concept of HOLISTIC CHAIR, which represents the chair as an integral object and is used by the child in solving simple practical tasks related to the use of the chair for its intended purpose. Then a junior student develops the concept of SYSTEM CHAIR (a chair as a system of parts) from a holistic concept, which together with it forms a two-level ontoconcept of HOLISTIC CHAIR → SYSTEM CHAIR. Thanks to the system concept, a junior student can now solve more complex, technical tasks (repair a chair, assemble it from parts, etc.). Finally, a senior student forms FUNCTIONAL CHAIR (a system of functions of the referent’s parts) from a system concept, which joins a two-level ontoconcept and turns it into a three-level:
HOLISTIC CHAIR → SYSTEM CHAIR → FUNCTIONAL CHAIR.
Now the senior student can abstract from the appearance of the chair and use only its function: to form new seats by placing a stack of bricks against the wall and under, to see the seats in the bend of the tree trunk, in the step of the stairs, etc. Thus, this and other ontoconcepts serve as the basis for the realization of three relatively independent types of verbal thinking in humans: practical, technical and theoretical.
About the Author
A. D. KoshelevRussian Federation
Aleksei D. Koshelev, Cand. of Sci. (Physics & Mathematics), associate professor
bldg. 1, bld. 13/16, Bolshaya Lubyanka Street, Moscow, 107031
References
1. Apresyan, Yu.D. (2014), “About Active dictionary of Modern Russian”, Apresyan, Yu.D. (ed.) Aktivnyi slovar’ sovremennogo russkogo yazyka [An Active dictionary of Modern Russian], vol. 1, Yazyki slavyanskoi kul’tury, Moscow, Russia, pp. 5–36.
2. Barsalou, L.W. (1999), “Perceptual symbol systems”, Behavioral and Brain Sciences, vol. 22, pp. 577–660.
3. Barsalou, L.W. (2020), “Challenges and Opportunities for Grounding Cognition”, Journal of Cognition, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 1–24.
4. Bernshtein, N.A. (1947), O postroenii dvizhenii [On the construction of movements], Medgiz, Moscow, Russia.
5. Chuprikova, N.I. (2007), Umstvennoe razvitie. Printsip differentsiatsii [Mental develop- ment. The Principle of differentiation], Piter, Saint Petersburg, Russia.
6. Glebkin, V.V. (2016), “Tetramerous model of cognitive development and cultural-histor- ical typology”, Etnographicheskoe obozrenie, no. 3, pp. 128–142.
7. Koshelev, A.D. (2017), Ocherki evolyutsionno-sinteticheskoi teorii yazyka [Essays on the Evolutionary-Synthetic Theory of Language], Izd. dom YaSK, Moscow, Russia.
8. Koshelev, A.D. (2019), On the Genesis of Thought and Language, Izd. dom YaSK, Moscow, Russia.
9. Koshelev, A.D. (2020), O kognitivnykh osnovaniyakh leksicheskoi klassifikatsii pred- metnogo mira [On the cognitive foundation of lexical classification of the subject world], Voprosy psikholingvistiki, vol. 4, no. 46, pp. 59–75.
10. Lakoff, G. (1987), Zhenshchiny, ogon’ i opasnye veshchi: Chto kategorii yazyka govoryat nam o myshlenii [Women, fire, and dangerous things: What categories reveal about the mind], Yazyki slavyanskoĭ kul’tury, Moscow, Russia.
11. Luriya, A.R. (1974), Ob istoricheskom razvitii poznavatel’nykh protsessov [Cognitive development: Its cultural and social foundations], Izd-vo Mosk. un-ta, Moscow, Russia.
12. Piaget, J. (1999), Rech i Myshlenie rebenka [The Language and Thought of the Child], Pedagogika-Press, Moscow, Russia.
13. Romanov, V.N. Kul’turno-istoricheskaya antropologiya [The cultural-historical anthro- pology], Tsentr gumanitarnykh initsiativ, Universitetskaya kniga, Moscow, Saint Petersburg, Russia.
14. Sechenov, I.M. (1952), Izbrannye proizvedeniya, T. 1, Fiziologiya i psikhologiya [Selected Works, vol. 1, Physiology and Psychology], Koshtoyants, Kh.S. (ed.), Akad. nauk SSSR, Moscow, Russia.
15. Tsien, J.Z. (2008), “Neural coding of episodic memory”, Dere, E., Easton, A., Nadel, L. and Huston, J.P. (eds.), Handbook of Episodic Memory, Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp. 399–416.
16. Tul’viste, P. (1988), Kul’turno-istoricheskoe razvitie verbal’nogo myshleniya [The cultural- historical development of verbal thinking], Valgus, Tallinn, Russia.
17. Vygonskii, L.S. (1996), Myshlenie i rech’ [Thought and Language], Labirint, Moscow, Russia.
Supplementary files
For citation: Koshelev A.D. On the separate (heterogeneity) existence of three types of verbal thinking: practical, technical and theoretical. RSUH/RGGU Bulletin: “Literary Teory. Linguistics. Cultural Studies”, Series. 2022;1(4(3)):378-391. https://doi.org/10.28995/2686-7249-2022-4-378-391
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
