Preview

RSUH/RGGU Bulletin: “Literary Teory. Linguistics. Cultural Studies”, Series

Advanced search

On the relationship between the concepts of phenomenon and noumenon in modern sociology

https://doi.org/10.28995/2686-7249-2022-4-392-400

Abstract

The article analyzes the meanings of the studied processes and phenomena. It is shown that modern sociology is limited mainly to traditional approaches, which are based on the analysis of phenomena – obvious, relatively simply interpreted concepts. It is shown that with all the variety of methodological orientations and methodological techniques, sociological research is mainly aimed at identifying, using and taking into account indicators of the life world, which are expressed through knowledge, opinion, needs, motives, value orientations, interests and other components of public consciousness, as well as such behavioral shares as deeds and actions. A prominent place is occupied by the phenomena of the macro-, meso- and microenvironment. With this approach, these components of the life world appear as phenomena perceived in experience, as objects of sensory contemplation, as a product of empirical knowledge. The conclusion is substantiated that such an approach seriously limits the possibilities of cognition. A transition to the use of the “noumenon” category is required, which makes it possible to reveal the intelligible, latent essence of phenomena and processes, which becomes apparent as a result of study, comprehension and contemplation. In this regard, the essence and content of the noumenon are determined, its ascent from the phenomenon is revealed, as well as its use in the study of social reality – the life world of people, social groups and communities of the modern world.

About the Author

Zh. T. Toshchenko
Russian State University for the Humanities
Russian Federation

Zhan T. Toshchenko, Corresnonding Member of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Dr. of Sci. (Philosophy), professor

bld. 6, Miusskaya Square, Moscow, 125047



 


References

1. Gulyga, A.V. (1977), Kant, Molodaya gvardiya, Moscow, Russia.

2. Husserl, E. (2013), Krizis evropeiskikh nauk i transtsendental’naya fenomenologiya [Crisis of European Sciences and Transcendental Phenomenology], Nauka, Saint Petersburg, Russia.

3. Leont’ev, D.A. (1999), Psikhologiya smysla [The psychology of meaning], Smysl, Moscow, Russia.

4. Narskii, I.S. (1979), “On the role of the ‘thing in itself’ and the noumenon in Kant’s epistemology”, Questions of the theoretical heritage of Immanuel Kant, iss. 4, pp. 15–20. Nikol’skii, S.A. (2015), Gorizonty smyslov. Filosofskie interpretatsii otechestvennoi literatury 13–20 vv. [Horizons of meanings. Philosophical interpretations of Russian

5. literature of the 19th–20th centuries], Moscow, Russia.

6. Schutz, A. (2004), Izbrannoe: mir, svetyashchiisya smyslom [Favorites: the world sanctified by meaning], ROSSPEN, Moscow, Russia.

7. Simon, J. (1974), “Phenomena and Nomena: On the Use and Meaning of the Categories”, Beck, L.W. (ed.), Kant’s Theory of Knowledge: Selected Papers from the Third International Kant Congress, Dordrecht, Netherlands; Boston, Massachusetts, USA.

8. Sztompka, P. (2001), “Social change as a trauma”, Sociological Studies, no. 1, pp. 6–16. Toshchenko, Zh.T. (2016), Sotsiologiya zhizni [Sociology of life], Unity-Dana, Moscow, Russia.

9. Toshchenko, Zh.T. (2020), Obshchestvo travmy: mezhdu evolyutsiei i revolyutsiei (Opyt teoreticheskogo i empiricheskogo analiza) [Society of trauma: between evolution and revolution (Experience of theoretical and empirical analysis)], Ves’ mir, Moscow, Russia.


Review

For citations:


Toshchenko Zh.T. On the relationship between the concepts of phenomenon and noumenon in modern sociology. RSUH/RGGU Bulletin: “Literary Teory. Linguistics. Cultural Studies”, Series. 2022;1(4(3)):392-400. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.28995/2686-7249-2022-4-392-400

Views: 146


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2073-6355 (Print)