Game practices of Russian symbolists as a reflection on cinematic language
https://doi.org/10.28995/2686-7249-2023-7-66-77
Abstract
The era of Russian Symbolism coincides with the period of cinematography penetration into urban everyday life. The new phenomenon needed to be comprehended. The verbally expressed layer of symbolists’ reflection on the nature of cinematography, expressed in fiction texts, articles and essays, was studied by N.M. Zorkaya, J.G. Tsivian and R. Bird. This article makes an attempt to analyze a nonverbalized type of reflection – symbolists’ mimetic game practices, where players bodily reproduced features of the cinematic experience. The sources of the research were the models of such game practices constructed by memoirists (A. Bely, L. Ivanova, V. Verigina, L. Ilyashenko). With the help of structuralist and semiotic methods, game gestures are analyzed as signifying game structures. It is established that their signified are disclosed as the problematization of 1) formal, structural and genre borders of film, 2) the phenomenon of voyeurism and the formative gaze of The Other, 3) the alienation of the actor’s body. The conclusion is made that at the time of the first decade of the 20th century the symbolists’ ideas about the nature of cinematic language were not yet clearly expressed, but existed in the form of a semantic conflict.
About the Author
Y. A. Kuz’mina
Russian State University for the Humanities
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Yuliya A. Kuz’mina, master of Culturology
bld. 6, Miusskaya Square, Moscow, 125047
References
1. Benjamin, W. (1996), Proizvedenie iskusstva v epokhu ego tekhnicheskoi vosproizvodimosti. Izbrannye esse [The work of art in the Age of Mechanical Reproduction. Selected essays], Romashko, S.A. (transl.), Medium, Moscow, Russia.
2. Birt, R. (2006), “Russian symbolism and the development of cinema aesthetics: the heritage of Vyach. Ivanov at A. Bakshi and Adr. Piotrovsky”, Novoe literaturnoe obozrenie, no. 5 (81), pp. 67–98.
3. Elsaesser Th., Hagener M. (2016), Teoriya kino. Glaz, emotsii, telo [Film Theory. An Introduction Through the Senses], transl. from English, Seans, Saint Petersburg, Russia.
4. Gofman, V. (1937), “The Symbolist Language”, Literaturnoe nasledstvo (Simvolisty) [Literary heritage (Symbolists)], vol. 27/28, pp. 54–105.
5. Jakobson, R. (1975), “Linguistics and poetics”, Strukturalizm: “za” i “protiv” [Structuralism “pro” and “contra”], Progress, Moscow, Russia, pp. 193–229.
6. Lotman, Yu.M. (1996), O poetakh i poezii: Analiz poeticheskogo teksta [On Poets and Poetry: An Analysis of the Poetic Text], Iskusstvo–SPb, Saint Petersburg, Russia.
7. Lotman, Yu.M. (1966), “Semiotics of cinema and problems of cinema aesthetics”, Ob iskusstve, Iskusstvo–SPb, Saint Petersburg, Russia, pp. 288–372.
8. Metz, K. (2013), Voobrazhaemoe oznachayushchee. Psikhoanaliz i kino [The imaginary signifier. Psychoanalysis and the cinema], Kalugin, D. (transl.), Izdatel’stvo Evropeyskogo universiteta v Sankt-Peterburge, Saint Petersburg, Russia.
9. Morin, E. (2005), The Cinema, or The Imaginary Man, Mortimer, L. (transl.), University of Minnesota Press Minneapolis, London, England.
10. Shevchenko, E.S. (2008), “Cinema as a ‘new farce’ (on the problem of the cinematic code in the literary work of the Symbolists)”, Bulletin of higher education institutes North Caucasus Region, Social sciences Series, no. 6, pp. 146–149.
11. Strashkova, O.K. (2004), “The Phenomemnom of Adaptation for stage in life and art as the realization of life creation conception in the aesthetics of modernists”, Vestnik Stavropol’skogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta, no. 39, pp. 154–160.
12. Tsivian, Yu.G. (1991), Istoricheskaya retseptsiya kino: Kinematograf v Rossii, 1896– 1930 [Historical Reception of Cinema: Cinematography in Russia, 1896–1930], Zinatne, Riga, Latvia.
13. Zorkaya, N.M. (1974), Na rubezhe dvukh stoletii: U istokov massovogo iskusstva v Rossii 1900–1910 godov [At the turn of two centuries: At the origins of mass art in Russia 1900–1910], Nauka, Moscow, Russia.
Review
For citations:
Kuz’mina Y.A. Game practices of Russian symbolists as a reflection on cinematic language. RSUH/RGGU Bulletin: “Literary Teory. Linguistics. Cultural Studies”, Series. 2023;(7):66-77. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.28995/2686-7249-2023-7-66-77
Views:
94
Email this article 