The vitality of androids. Living and non-living in the of modern science fiction TV shows
https://doi.org/10.28995/2686-7249-2023-7-119-134
Abstract
About the Author
L. G. ZhigalovaRussian Federation
Lyudmila G. Zhigalova, postgraduate student
bld. 27/4, Lomonosovsky Avenue, Moscow, 119192
References
1. Aronson, O. (2006), “The cosmic unconscious. Stanley Kubrick’s analytics”, Fantasticheskoe kino. Epizod pervyi: sbornik statei [Fantastic Cinema. Episode one: a collection of articles], Novoe lit. obozrenie, Moscow, Russia, pp. 213–130.
2. Banerjee, A. (2012), We Modern People: Science Fiction and the Making of Russian Modernity, Middletown, USA.
3. Buck-Morss, S. (2013), Aesthetics and Anaesthetics, Part I, available at: https://www. susanbuckmorss.info/text/aesthetics-and-anaesthetics-part-i/ (Accessed 5 February 2022).
4. Clynes, M.E. and Kline, N.S. (1960) “Cyborgs and Space”, Astronautics. 1960, September, pp. 26–27, 74–76.
5. Jameson, F. (2006), “Progress versus utopia, or Can we imagine the future?”, Fantasticheskoe kino. Ehpizod pervyi [Fantastic Cinema. Episode one: a collection of articles, collection of articles], Novoe lit. obozrenie, Moscow, Russia, pp. 38–39.
6. Gurevich, P. (2012), Filosofskoe tolkovanie cheloveka [Philosophical interpretation of man], Tsentr gumanitarnykh initsiativ, Moscow, Russia.
7. Gurov, O. (2021), “Man and technology: who is a parasite to whom? A study of foreign soap operas and films”, The art and science of television, vol. 17, no. 2, pp. 35–58.
8. Haraway, D. (1985) Manifest kiborgov: nauka, tekhnologiya i sotsialisticheskii feminizm 1980-kh [Cyborg Manifesto: Science, Technology and Socialist Feminism of the 1980s], Ad Marginem Press, Moscow, Russia,
9. Kochina T. (2022) ‘In search of a new subjectivity. The viewer as a cyborg (on the example of Adina Pintilie’s ‘Touch me not’)”, RSUH/RGGU Bulletin. “Literary Studies. Linguistics. Cultural Studies” Series, no. 7, pp. 98–108.
10. Mittel, J. (2006), “Narrative complexity in contemporary American television”, The Velvet Light Trap, vol. 58 (1), pp. 29–40.
11. Sokolovskiy, S. (2018), “Bodies and technologies through the prism of techno-anthropology”, Antropologicheskii forum, no. 38, pp. 99–121.
12. Stewart, G. (1985), “The ‘Videoly’ of Science Fiction”, Shadows of the Magic Lamp: Fantasy and Science Ficin in Film, Southern Illinois U.P., Carbondale, USA. Stolbova N. (2022) “The image of a synthetic in the Alien franchise: the phenomenology of man-robot interaction”, Semioticheskie issledovaniya [Semiotic studies], vol. 2, no. 4, pp. 22–40.
13. Stroeva O. (2018) “Phenomenology of body in the context of posthumanism (on the example of popular cyberpunk serials)”, The art and science of television, no. 14.1, pp. 41–56.
14. Sukovataya, V. (2012), “Cyborg: ‘Animated dead’ or ‘Dead animation’? The Body and its Transgressions in the digital culture space”, International Journal of Cultural Research, no. 3, pp. 69–73.
15. Wegner, Ph. (2014), Shockwaves of Possibilities: Essays on Science Fiction, Globalization, and Utopia, N.Y., USA, pp. 16–42.
16. Westfahl, G. (1998), Mechanics of Wonder, Liverpool, UK.
Supplementary files
For citation: Zhigalova L.G. The vitality of androids. Living and non-living in the of modern science fiction TV shows. RSUH/RGGU Bulletin: “Literary Teory. Linguistics. Cultural Studies”, Series. 2023;(7):119-134. https://doi.org/10.28995/2686-7249-2023-7-119-134
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.