The vitality of androids. Living and non-living in the of modern science fiction TV shows


https://doi.org/10.28995/2686-7249-2023-7-119-134

Full Text:




Abstract

Humanity has been inventing a robot throughout its history. The steam-powered Pigeon of Archytas and the automatic servant made by Philo of Byzantium belong to the antiquity. Automatons of St. Albertus Magnus, Bacon and Regiomontanus, the Jewish golems, the anthropomorphic idols of Daedalus, the “Iron man” of the Russian monarch Ivan IV, Leonardo’s mechanical knight, the Writer, the Draftsman and the Pianist of Pierre Jaquet-Droz. Each following epoch filled up the list of inventions seeking to come as close as possible to the likeness of the living. At the same time, the desire to reproduce any possible manifestations of vitality has always been accompanied by unaccountable fear of the artificial, non-living and its invasion into the living space. With the advent of cinema, these desires and fears have acquired a new “face” – the number of all sorts of doppelgangers, technical entities generated by the science has multiplied; new images – robots, cyborgs, androids. They have got not only a new aesthetic, a special screen appeal of animated machines, but also a new subjectivity – a certain type of perception based on the indistinguishability between artificial and natural. The modern media landscape offers opportunities for conceptualization beyond the oppositions: the extension of the idea of life, the existence of hybrids and human network extensions, variations of artificial intelligence, autonomous non-human agents and communities. In this regard, the new authenticity seems to be an inseparable combination of technical and natural existing in the same space, in the same body. The article explores the idea of new subjectivity of androids, cyborgs, replicants in modern science fiction TV shows, connected with a special vitality, perception, senses and cognition (“Extant” (2014-2015), “Humans” (2015–2018), “Westworld” (2016–2018), “Altered Carbon” (2018), “Raised by Wolves” (2021)

About the Author

L. G. Zhigalova
Lomonosov Moscow State University
Russian Federation

Lyudmila G. Zhigalova, postgraduate student

bld. 27/4, Lomonosovsky Avenue, Moscow, 119192



References

1. Aronson, O. (2006), “The cosmic unconscious. Stanley Kubrick’s analytics”, Fantasticheskoe kino. Epizod pervyi: sbornik statei [Fantastic Cinema. Episode one: a collection of articles], Novoe lit. obozrenie, Moscow, Russia, pp. 213–130.

2. Banerjee, A. (2012), We Modern People: Science Fiction and the Making of Russian Modernity, Middletown, USA.

3. Buck-Morss, S. (2013), Aesthetics and Anaesthetics, Part I, available at: https://www. susanbuckmorss.info/text/aesthetics-and-anaesthetics-part-i/ (Accessed 5 February 2022).

4. Clynes, M.E. and Kline, N.S. (1960) “Cyborgs and Space”, Astronautics. 1960, September, pp. 26–27, 74–76.

5. Jameson, F. (2006), “Progress versus utopia, or Can we imagine the future?”, Fantasticheskoe kino. Ehpizod pervyi [Fantastic Cinema. Episode one: a collection of articles, collection of articles], Novoe lit. obozrenie, Moscow, Russia, pp. 38–39.

6. Gurevich, P. (2012), Filosofskoe tolkovanie cheloveka [Philosophical interpretation of man], Tsentr gumanitarnykh initsiativ, Moscow, Russia.

7. Gurov, O. (2021), “Man and technology: who is a parasite to whom? A study of foreign soap operas and films”, The art and science of television, vol. 17, no. 2, pp. 35–58.

8. Haraway, D. (1985) Manifest kiborgov: nauka, tekhnologiya i sotsialisticheskii feminizm 1980-kh [Cyborg Manifesto: Science, Technology and Socialist Feminism of the 1980s], Ad Marginem Press, Moscow, Russia,

9. Kochina T. (2022) ‘In search of a new subjectivity. The viewer as a cyborg (on the example of Adina Pintilie’s ‘Touch me not’)”, RSUH/RGGU Bulletin. “Literary Studies. Linguistics. Cultural Studies” Series, no. 7, pp. 98–108.

10. Mittel, J. (2006), “Narrative complexity in contemporary American television”, The Velvet Light Trap, vol. 58 (1), pp. 29–40.

11. Sokolovskiy, S. (2018), “Bodies and technologies through the prism of techno-anthropology”, Antropologicheskii forum, no. 38, pp. 99–121.

12. Stewart, G. (1985), “The ‘Videoly’ of Science Fiction”, Shadows of the Magic Lamp: Fantasy and Science Ficin in Film, Southern Illinois U.P., Carbondale, USA. Stolbova N. (2022) “The image of a synthetic in the Alien franchise: the phenomenology of man-robot interaction”, Semioticheskie issledovaniya [Semiotic studies], vol. 2, no. 4, pp. 22–40.

13. Stroeva O. (2018) “Phenomenology of body in the context of posthumanism (on the example of popular cyberpunk serials)”, The art and science of television, no. 14.1, pp. 41–56.

14. Sukovataya, V. (2012), “Cyborg: ‘Animated dead’ or ‘Dead animation’? The Body and its Transgressions in the digital culture space”, International Journal of Cultural Research, no. 3, pp. 69–73.

15. Wegner, Ph. (2014), Shockwaves of Possibilities: Essays on Science Fiction, Globalization, and Utopia, N.Y., USA, pp. 16–42.

16. Westfahl, G. (1998), Mechanics of Wonder, Liverpool, UK.


Supplementary files

For citation: Zhigalova L.G. The vitality of androids. Living and non-living in the of modern science fiction TV shows. RSUH/RGGU Bulletin: “Literary Teory. Linguistics. Cultural Studies”, Series. 2023;(7):119-134. https://doi.org/10.28995/2686-7249-2023-7-119-134

Views: 81

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2073-6355 (Print)