Preview

RSUH/RGGU Bulletin: “Literary Teory. Linguistics. Cultural Studies”, Series

Advanced search

Pushkin. Ethics and ideal in a relativizing context

https://doi.org/10.28995/2686-7249-2023-9-68-82

Abstract

The article considers the specifics of the functioning of relativizing and auctorial elements in some texts of Alexander Pushkin on the example of the poem “The Prisoner of the Caucasus” and the tragedy “A Feast in Time of Plague”. It is shown that relativistic tendencies in those works coexist with auctorial tendencies, as if “without noticing” each other. It avoids both the dictate of auctoriality and the ethical indifference characteristic of consistently relativistic aesthetic models. We see parts of a single meta-relativistic composition that deliberately contradicts the seemingly incompatible. Thus, a sympathetic description of the Circassians and an enthusiastic description of their military exploits in “The Prisoner of the Caucasus” neighbors an equally enthusiastic glorification of the punitive actions of the Russian army in the Caucasus. Particular attention in this article is paid to transgressive forms of representation of everyday life in the tragedy “A Feast in Time of Plague”. At the forefront of such a context is not Walsingham’s explicit dispute with the priest but the hidden representation of the ideal in Mary’s song, in which the heroine, Jenny, opposes both the relativizing actant of the vulgar feast and the normatively abstract moralizing of the priest by the very possibility of her existence. Jenny calls to nothing and nowhere, but the very presence of her tragic image in the partially relativizing actant of the play introduces a very significant metarelativist counterbalance and meaning to what is depicted.

About the Author

P. E. Spivakovskii
Russian State University for the Humanities
Russian Federation

Pavel E. Spivakovskii, Cand. of Sci (Philology), associate professor

6, Miusskaya Sq., Moscow, 125047



References

1. Auerbakh, E. (1976), Mimesis: Izobrazhenie deistvitel’nosti v zapadnoevropeiskoi literature [Mimesis. The representation of reality in Western European literature], Progress, Moscow, USSR.

2. Bakhtin, M.M. (2000), Sobranie sochinenii: v 7 tomakh [Collected works in 7 vols], vol. 2, Russkie slovari, Moscow, Russia.

3. Dolinin, A.A. (2007), Pushkin i Angliya: tsikl statei [Pushkin and England. Series of articles], Novoe literaturnoe obozrenie, Moscow, Russia.

4. Craik, J. (2007), Kratkaia istoriya uniformy: (forma napokaz: ot traditsionalizma k vyzovu) [A brief history of the uniform. Uniforms exposed. From conformity to transgression], Novoe literaturnoe obozrenie, Moscow, Russia.

5. Lotman, Yu.M. (1966), “The artistic structure of ‘Eugene Onegin’ ”, in Trudy po russkoi i slavyanskoi filologii. IX, no. 184, Tartu, USSR, pp. 5–32.

6. Lotman, Yu.M. (2003), Pushkin [Pushkin], Iskusstvo-SPB, Saint Petersburg, Russia.

7. Lyamina, E., Nazarova, N. and Ospovat, A. (2009), “On a study of Pushkin’s prose (II)”, in Trudy po russkoi i slavyanskoi filologii. Literaturovedenie. VII. Novaya seriya, Tartu University Press, Tartu, Estonia, pp. 128–141.

8. Mazur, N.N. (2019), “Pushkin and Yazykov’s poetic dialogue in the mid-1820s. New perspectives”, in Acta Slavica Estonica. XI: Pushkinskie chteniya v Tartu. 6. Vyp. 1: Pushkin v krugu sovremennikov [Pushkin among his contemporaries], University of Tartu Press, Tartu, Estonia, pp. 47–94.

9. Ospovat, A.L. (1998), “Historical material and historical allusions in ‘The Captain’s Daughter’: Article one”, in Tynyanovsky sbornik [Tynyanov’s collection], iss. 10, Moscow, Russia, pp. 40–67.

10. Ospovat, A.L. (2001), “From a Commentary on ‘The Captain’s Daughter’: Cheap Popular Prints”, The Pushkin Conference at Stanford. Proceedings and Research, OGI, Moscow, Russia, pp. 357–365.

11. Peskov, A.M. (2000), “On the origin of the myth of Pushkin’s all-responsiveness”, Novoe literaturnoe obozrenie, no. 42, pp. 230–238.

12. Piksanov, N.K. (1958), “‘Bednaia Anyuta’ (Poor Aniuta) by Radishchev and ‘Bednaнa Liza’ (Poor Liza) by Karamzin”, in XVIII vek [18th century], Collection 3, Izdatel’stvo AN SSSR, Moscow, Leningrad, USSR, pp. 309–325.

13. Proskurin, O.A. (2001), Poeziia Pushkina, ili Podvizhnyi palimpsest [Pushkin’s poetry, or a Mobile palimpsest], Novoe literaturnoe obozrenie, Moscow, Russia.

14. Spivakovskii, P.E. (2022), “F.M. Dostoevsky’s artistic epistemology in a metarelativist context”, in Proceedings of the 21st Holy Trinity Annual International Academic Conference in St. Petersburg, May 26–29, 2021, Izdatel’stvo Russkoi khristianskoi gumanitarnoi akademii, Saint Petersburg, Russia, pp. 99–104.

15. Tertz, A. (Sinyavskii, A.D.), (2005), Progulki s Pushkinym [Strolls with Pushkin], Globulus, ENAS, Moscow, Russia.

16. Chudakov, A.P. (1992), “Pushkin’s character structure”, in Collection of articles for the 70th anniversary of professor Yu.M. Lotman, Tartu, Estonia, pp. 190–207.


Review

For citations:


Spivakovskii P.E. Pushkin. Ethics and ideal in a relativizing context. RSUH/RGGU Bulletin: “Literary Teory. Linguistics. Cultural Studies”, Series. 2023;(9):68-82. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.28995/2686-7249-2023-9-68-82

Views: 104


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2073-6355 (Print)