Preview

RSUH/RGGU Bulletin: “Literary Teory. Linguistics. Cultural Studies”, Series

Advanced search

“The chastity of non-personal inspiration”. To the problem of method in the work of S.S. Averintsev

https://doi.org/10.28995/2686-7249-2023-7-150-162

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to determine the role of tradition in the work of S. Averintsev. The novelty of the study lies in the fact that the work of the author is considered as a trinity, which includes scientific research, translations and poetry of Averintsev. The article hypothesizes that Averintsev’s worldview is based on the philosophy of omniscience, the scientific transcription of which was the Russian school of historical poetics and, more broadly, the Romantic hermeneutics of culture. Central to Averintsev’s method is the concept of tradition, which allows the researcher to consider cultural phenomena that chronologically belong to different eras and styles within the framework of a single and unified semantic horizon – the “big time” of culture. The article substantiates the thesis that the dialogue with cultural tradition presupposes the procedure of self-removal, which he called “the chastity of non-personal inspiration”. Self-removal, as listening to tradition, is the main hermeneutic setting of his creative consciousness and forms the basis of his poetic, translation and scientific method. The method of interpreting cultural tradition is examined in spiritual poems, translations from German-language poetry, and an example from his work “Ancient Greek literature and Near Eastern writings”.

About the Author

A. L. Volskii
Herzen University
Russian Federation

Alexei L. Volskii, Dr. of Sci. (Philology), associate professor

48, Moika Emb., Saint Petersburg, 191186



References

1. Asoyan, Yu.A. (2020), “Averintsev and the project of intellectual history”, Vestnik kul’turologii, no. 1, pp. 114–130.

2. Averintsev, S.S. (1996), “Greek ‘literature’ and Middle Eastern ‘landuage arts’ ”, in Averintsev, S.S., Ritorika i istoki evropeiskoi literaturnoi traditsii [Rhetoric and the origins of the European literary tradition], Yazyki russkoi kul’tury, Moscow, Russia, pp. 13–75.

3. Averintsev, S.S. (1996), “Ancient Greek poetics and world literature”, in Averintsev, S.S., Ritorika i istoki evropeiskoi literaturnoi traditsii [Rhetoric and the origins of the European literary tradition], Yazyki russkoi kul’tury, Moscow, Russia, pp. 146–157.

4. Balakshina, Yu.V. (2019), “Hermeneutics S.S. Averintseva. Origins, principles, originality”, Vestnik Svyato-Filaretovskogo instituta, no. 32, pp. 110–127.

5. Bibikhin, V.V. (2004), “Records of meetings”, Voprosy literatury, no. 6, рp. 28–33.

6. Gasparov, M.L. (2004), “In memory of Sergei Averintsev”, Vestnik drevnei istorii, no. 4, pp. 225–226.

7. Knabe, G.S. (2004), “About Averintsev”, Voprosy literatury, no. 6, pp. 34–37.

8. Mikhailov, A.V. (1986), “Historical poetics in the context of Western literary criticism”, in Khrapchenko, M.B., ed. (1986), Istoricheskaya poetika: itogi i perspektivy izucheniya [Historical poetics. Results and prospects of the study], Nauka, Moscow, USSR, pp. 53–71.


Review

For citations:


Volskii A.L. “The chastity of non-personal inspiration”. To the problem of method in the work of S.S. Averintsev. RSUH/RGGU Bulletin: “Literary Teory. Linguistics. Cultural Studies”, Series. 2023;(7(2)):150-162. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.28995/2686-7249-2023-7-150-162

Views: 110


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2073-6355 (Print)