Environmental discourse after the environmental turn. UN climate conferences
https://doi.org/10.28995/2686-7249-2023-7-279-292
Abstract
The article is devoted to the analysis of modern environmental discourse in the global public space. Multilateral conferences on environmental issues are becoming a recognized platform with a high degree of conventionality and legitimacy. The article examines elements and markers that make it possible to judge the value foundations of discursive statements and the relationships that arise between subjects. Studies of environmental discourse, conducted in the humanities from the perspective of an environmental cognitive turn, make it possible to present the complexity of modern public ideas about nature and man and form a new view on the content of discussions about the environment in the public field.
About the Author
A. A. KuleshovaRussian Federation
Anastasia A. Kuleshova, independent researcher
Moscow
References
1. Carter, R.E. and Lasenby, D.C. (1977), “Values and ecology. Prolegomena to an environmental ethics”, Alternatives, vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 39–43.
2. Ivanova, E.V. (2007), “On the problem of studying environmental discourse”, Political linguistics journal, vol. 23, no. 3, pp. 134–137.
3. Kalenova, O.G. and Dubrovskaya, T.V. (2015), “On the problem of defining environmental discourse and its genres”, Proceedings of Voronezh State University. Series: Linguistics and Intercultural Communication, vol. 16, no. 2, S. 6–12.
4. Latour B. (2018). Gde prizemlit’sya? Opyt politicheskoi orientatsii [Where to land? Experience of political orientation], Izdatel’stvo Evropeiskogo universiteta v Sankt-Peterburge, Saint Petersburg, Russia.
5. Levushin, A.N. (2009), “Environmental discourse in everyday culture”, Personality. Culture. Society, vol. 11, no. 4, pp. 385–395.
6. Morton, T. (2013), Hyperobjects. philosophy and ecology after the end of the world, University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis, Saint Paul, USA.
7. Phillips, L. and Jorgensen, M. (2008), Diskurs-analiz: teoriya i metod [Discourse analysis. Theory and method], Gumanitarnyi tsentr, Har’kov, Ukraine.
8. Rolston, H. (1975), “Is there an ecological ethic?”, Ethics, vol. 85, no. 2, pp. 91–109.
9. Rolston, H. (2012), A new environmental ethics. The next millennium for life on Earth, Routledge, New York, USA, London, UK.
10. Steffen, W., Grinevald, J., Crutzen, P. and McNeill, J. (2011), “The Anthropocene. Conceptual and historical perspectives”, Philosophical Transactions. Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences (Series A), vol. 369, iss. 1938, pp. 842–867
Review
For citations:
Kuleshova A.A. Environmental discourse after the environmental turn. UN climate conferences. RSUH/RGGU Bulletin: “Literary Teory. Linguistics. Cultural Studies”, Series. 2023;(7(2)):279-292. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.28995/2686-7249-2023-7-279-292
Views:
201
Email this article 