An act as a form of psychological representation in prose about the era of the Great Terror (“Tulaev’s Case” by V. Serge and “Imaginary Quantities” by N. Narokov)
https://doi.org/10.28995/2686-7249-2020-10-226-235
Abstract
The article deals with the consideration of the category of action – a fundamental one in the study of a literary character. Methodologically productive in this regard are the achievements of related humanities (psychology, sociology, philosophy) in understanding the individual and his relationship with the world. As a material for analysis, prose about the era of the Great Terror was chosen, which is especially representative from the viewpoint of the aesthetics of the author’s individual imprinting of the character in extreme conditions. Example of “Tulaev’s Case” by V. Serge and “Imaginary Quantities” by N. Narokov is used to consider the behavior types of several groups of characters: those with power, claiming to be free thinking and prisoners. An attempt is made to trace the correlation of the external and internal freedom of the characters in the conditions of totalitarianism, moving from figures with the greatest potential of possibilities to disenfranchised characters. In addition, attention is paid to the phenomenon of external and internal conformism as a product of the epoch, on the one hand, and the consequence of purely personal manifestations, on the other.
Keywords
About the Author
E. A. BelousovaRussian Federation
Evgenia A. Belousova, master’s student
1, Leninskie Gory, Moscow, 119991
References
1. Bakhtin, M.M. (2003), Sobranie sochinenii: V 7 t. [Collected works in 7 vols], vol. 1, Russkie slovari, Yazyki slavyanskoi kul’tury, Moscow, Russia.
2. Krasil’nikov, R.L. (2010), “On the issue of the heroic in the theory and history of literature”, Vestnik Moskovskogo universiteta. Seriya 9: Filologiya [Bulletin of the Moscow University. Philology], Moscow, Russia, pp. 70–80.
3. Krishtaleva, L.G. (2010), Filosofiya i etika postupka: struktura i znachenie postupka v razlichnykh kul’turno-istoricheskikh obstoyatel’stvakh – opyt rekonstruktsii [Philosophy and ethics of an act. The structure and meaning of an act in various cultural and historical circumstances – the experience of reconstruction], Institut filosofii RAN, Moscow, Russia.
4. Leont’ev, A.N. (1975), Deyatel’nost’. Lichnost’. Soznanie [Activity. Personality. Conscience], Politizdat, Moscow, USSR.
5. Levin, K. (2000), Teoriya polya v sotsial’nykh naukakh [Field theory in the social sciences], Rech’, Saint Petersburg, Russia.
6. Pershin, Yu.Yu. (2007), Fenomen sublimacii: opyt filosofsko-antropologicheskogo issledovaniya [The phenomenon of sublimation. The experience of philosophical and anthropological research], SIBIT, Omsk, Russia.
7. Selezneva, M.A. (2006), Poetika kharakterov v “Rasskazakh 1922–1924 gg.” [Poetics of characters in “Stories of 1922–1924”], Ph.D. Thesis (Philology), Tambov State University, Tambov, Russia.
8. Tovmasyan, R.M. (2007), “The issue of diversity of theoretical approaches in psychology. Methodological aspect”, Vestnik Kostromskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Seriya: Pedagogika. Psikhologiya. Sotsiokinetikaya [Bulletin of Kostroma State University: Pedagogy. Psychology. Sociokinetics], Kostroma, Russia, pp. 155–159.
9. Tsekhanovskaya, L. (1987), “The existentialist aspect of William Styron’s creative work”, Uchenye zapiski Tartuskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta [Scientific notes of the Tartu State University], Tartu, Estonia, pp. 126–133. (Uchenye zapiski Tartuskogo universiteta)
Review
For citations:
Belousova E.A. An act as a form of psychological representation in prose about the era of the Great Terror (“Tulaev’s Case” by V. Serge and “Imaginary Quantities” by N. Narokov). RSUH/RGGU Bulletin: “Literary Teory. Linguistics. Cultural Studies”, Series. 2020;(10(2)):226-235. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.28995/2686-7249-2020-10-226-235