On the functional characteristics of genres in Skaldic poetry
https://doi.org/10.28995/2686-7249-2024-1-77-109
Abstract
The article analyses the functional characteristics of the main genres of skaldic poetry: panegyric verse, memorial poems (erfidrápur), shield poems (skjaldardrápur), head-ransom verse (höfuðlausn), love poetry (mansöngr) and libellous poems (níð). Olga Freidenberg’s conception of the salvational and chthonic functions of the word is applied to the genres of skaldic poetry which are discussed in the paper. Skaldic libellous verse (níð), rooted in rune magic, is endowed with a chthonic function, whereas head-ransoms characterised by autonominative, equitemporal semantics, acquire a salvational role. The salvational role of head-ransoms (höfuðlausn) is ensured by the use of auto-referential semantics (when the speech act is directed not at the addressee but at the creator of the poem himself), of performative formulas and of a hyper-structuralised form – runhent meter with final rhyme overloaded with sound devices. The pragmatic function of love poems (mansöngr) is determined by their intended influence on the addressee: they serve to manipulate the addressee’s mentality and behaviour, ensuring the performance of a particular action (granting favour to a skald). Erfidrápur are endowed not only with a memorial function but also with a life-affirming role, conditioned by the idea of familial renewal and vitality. The function of skaldic shield poems (skjaldardrápur) is dissociated in the article from descriptive visual imagery of material objects. It is argued in the paper that shield poems function as thesauri of mythological kennings: their poetic form facilitates the process of memorising kennings, and their prose context provides explanations and motivates their usage. Ragnarsdrápa, which alludes to, rather than describes, mythological scenes of Þorr’s fishing for Jǫrmungandr, Hamðir and Sǫrli, taking revenge on Jǫrmunrekkr, and the never-ending battle between Heðin and Hǫgni, is not descriptive, or narrative, or intentionally communicative. The marginality of the communicative function of skaldic poetry is conditioned by violation of direct word-order, the use of parataxis, which obscures the syntactic structure of a stanza, of kennings with their informative deficiency, of inserted and interlaced clauses, breaking the semantic organisation of a half-stanza, and of increased significance of sound repetitions, which is characteristic of magic and ritual.
About the Author
I. G. MatyushinaRussian Federation
Inna G. Matyushina, Dr. of Sci. (Philology)
6, Miusskaya Sq., Moscow, 125047
References
1. Clunies Ross, M. (1981), “Style and authorial presence in Skaldic mythological poetry”, in Saga-book of the Viking society for Northern research, vol. 20, London, UK, pp. 276–304.
2. Clunies Ross, M. (2005), A history of Old Norse poetry and poetics. D.S. Brewer, Cambridge, UK.
3. Clunies Ross, M. (2015), “Self-description in Egil’s poetry” in de Looze, L., Helgason, J.K., Poole, R. and Tulinius T.H., eds., Egil, the Viking poet. New approaches to Egil’s saga, Toronto University Press, Toronto, Canada, pp. 75–94. (Toronto Old NorseIcelandic Series)
4. de Looze, L. (2015), “The concept of the self in Egil’s saga”, in de Looze, L., Helgason, J.K., Poole, R. and Tulinius T.H., eds., Egil, the Viking poet. New approaches to Egil’ssaga, Toronto University Press, Toronto, Canada, pp. 57–74. (Toronto Old NorseIcelandic Series)
5. Finlay, A. (2001), “Monstrous allegations: an exchange of ýki in Bjarnar saga Hítdælakappa”, Alvíssmál, no. 10, pp. 21–44.
6. Frank, R. (1970), “Onomastic play in Kormakr’s verse: the name Steingerðr”, Mediaeval Scandinavia, vol. 3, pp. 7–34.
7. Frank, R. (1985), “Skaldic poetry”, in Clover, C. and Lindow, J., eds., Old Norse-Icelandic Literature: A Critical Guide, Cornell University Press, Ithaca, USA, pp. 157–196. (Islandica; 42)
8. Fuglesang, S.H. (2007), “Ekphrasis and surviving imagery in Viking Scandinavia”, Viking and Medieval Scandinavia, vol. 3, pp. 193–224.
9. Gade, K.E. (2012), “Dating of poetry and principles of normalization”, in Whaley, D., ed.) Poetry from the Kings’ Sagas 1: From Mythical Times to c. 1035, Brepols, Turnhout, Belgium, pp. XLIV–XLVI. (Skaldic Poetry of the Scandinavian Middle Ages; 1)
10. Golovanenko, D.A. (2023), Sotsiokul’turnye konteksty bytovaniya skal’dicheskikh kommunikativnykh praktik v Islandii XI–XIV vv. [The sociocultural contexts of Skaldic communicative practices in 11th – 14th-centuries Iceland], Ph.D. Thesis (Philology), Vysshaya shkola ekonomiki, Moscow, Russia.
11. Guðrún Nordal (2015), “Skaldic poetics and the making of the sagas of Icelanders”, in Turco, J., ed., New Norse studies: Essays on the literature and culture of Medieval Scandinavia. Cornell University Library, Ithaca, USA, pp. 117–142. (Islandica; 58)
12. Guðrún Nordal (2001), Skaldic versifying and social discrimination in Medieval Iceland. The Dorothea Coke memorial lecture in Northern studies, University college, The Viking Society for Northern Research, London, UK.
13. Guðrún Nordal (2001), Tools of literacy: The role of Skaldic verse in Icelandic textual culture of the 12th and 13th centuriesUniversity of Toronto Press, Toronto, Canada.
14. Gurevich, E.A. and Matyushina, I.G. (2000), Poeziya skal’dov [Skaldic poetry], RGGU, Moscow, Russia.
15. Liberman, A. (1994), “The formulaic mind and the Skalds”, in Liberman, A. The word Heath, Wortheide, Orðheiði. Essays on Germanic literature and usage (1972–1992), Il Calamo, Rome, Italy, pp. 41–55. (Episteme dell’Antichità e oltre; 1)
16. Matyushina, I.G. (2010), “Love Poetry as Portion”, in Prostranstvo koldovstva [The Space of Witchcraft], RGGU, Moscow, Russia, pp. 229–258.
17. Matyushina, I.G. (2018), “The salvational and chtonic function of word in Old Norse culture”, RSUH/RGGU Bulletin. “Literary Theory. Linguistics. Cultural Studies” Series, no. 3-1, pp. 30–42.
18. Matyushina, I.G. (2023), “Ekphrasis in Skaldic poetry”, in Ivanova, Yu.V. and Davidoglu, S.N., eds., Mif, ritual, literature [Myth, ritual, literature], Izdatelskii dom Vysshei shkoly ekonomiki, Moscow, Russia, pp. 409–423.
19. Olsen, K. (2016), Conceptualizing the enemy in Early Northwest Europe: Metaphors of conflict and alterity in Anglo-Saxon, Old Norse, and Early Irish poetry. Brepols, Turnhout, Belgium. (Medieval Identities: Socio-Cultural Spaces; 6)
20. Smirnitskaya, O.A. (2005), Egill Skallagrímsson. Utrata synovey [Egill Skallagrímsson. The irreparable loss of sons], in Smirnitskaya, O.A., Kanony i tolkovaniya [Canons and interpretations], Yazyki slavyanskikh kul’tur, Moscow, Russia, pp. 49–106.
21. Smirnitskaya, O.A. (2005), “The enumeration of the Ynglingar”, in Smirnitskaya, O.A., Kanony i tolkovaniya [Canons and interpretations], Yazyki slavyanskikh kul’tur, Moscow, Russia, pp. 107–151.
22. Smirnitskaya, O.A. (2008), “Poetry and linguistics of the Skalds”, in Smirnitskaya, O.A., Izbrannye stat’i po germanskoi filologii [Selected articles on Germanic philology], Moscow, Russia, 2008, pp. 219–230.
23. Steblin-Kamenskii, M.I. (1978), “The Old Norse poetic term ‘dróttkvætt’ ”, in SteblinKamenskii, M.I., Istoricheskaya poetika [Historical poetics], Nauka, Leningrad, USSR.
24. Steblin-Kamenskii, M.I. (1979), “Skaldic Poetry”, in Steblin-Kamenskii, M.I., Drevneskandinavskaya literatura [Old Norse literature], Vysshaya shkola, Moscow, USSR.
25. Steinsland, G. and Vogt, K. (1981), „‘Aukinn ertu Uolse ok vpp vm tekinn’. En religionshistorisk analyse av Vǫlsa þáttr i Flateyjarbók“, Arkiv för nordisk filologi, Bd. 96, pp. 87–106.
26. Steinsland, G. (1997), Eros og død i norrøne myter, Universitetsforlaget, Oslo, Norway.
27. Vésteinn, Ólason (1998), Dialogues with the Viking age: Narration and representation in the sagas of Icelanders, Heimskringla, Reykjavík, Iceland.
Supplementary files
For citation: Matyushina I.G. On the functional characteristics of genres in Skaldic poetry. RSUH/RGGU Bulletin: “Literary Teory. Linguistics. Cultural Studies”, Series. 2024;(1):77-109. https://doi.org/10.28995/2686-7249-2024-1-77-109
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.