Metafictional commentary of auctorial narrator in Mikhail Chulkov’s “Mocker”
https://doi.org/10.28995/2686-7249-2024-3-42-50
Abstract
The article deals with the analysis of the metafictional commentary of the auctorial narrator in M. Chulkov’s novel “Mocker” in the light of the poetics of reflexive traditionalism. The analysis of the structural level and subject masks of the verbalization of a metafictional comment is carried out. It also traces the unity of textual, metatextual and paratextual metafictional reflection. Its types of commentary, both compositional and thematic, are distinguished in connection with the level of verbalization and its rhetorical decoration.
About the Author
I. D. Deikun
Russian State University for the humanities
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Ilia D. Deikun, postgraduate student
6, Miusskaya Sq., Moscow, 125047
References
1. Averintsev, S.S. (1996), Ritorika i istoki evropeiskoi literaturnoi traditsii [Rhetoric and the origins of the European literary tradition], Shkola “Yazyki russkoi kultury”, Moscow, Russia.
2. Anokhina, T.Ya. (2009), “From the history of punctuation marks”, in Izvestiya MGTU “MAMI”, no. 1, pp. 230–233.
3. Braginskaya, N.V. (2007), “Commentary as a mechanism of innovation in traditional culture and more”, Mirovoe drevo = Arbor mundi, no. 14, pp. 19–66.
4. Darvin, M.N. (2018), Poeticheskii mir liricheskogo tsikla: Avtor i tekst [The poetic world of the lyric cycle. Author and text], RGGU, Moscow, Russia.
5. Dzyuba, E.M. (2006), Stanovlenie i razvitie zhanra romana v russkoi literature 70–80-kh godov XVIII veka [Emergence and development of the novel genre in Russian literature of the 70s – 80s of the 18th century], Abstract of D. Sc. Dissertation (Philology), Moscow, Russia.
6. Fludernick, M. (2003), “Metanarrative and metafictional commentary. From metadiscursivity to metanarration and metafiction”, Poetica, vol. 35, no. 1/2, pp. 1–39.
7. Garrard, J. (1976), “ ‘Russian Scarron’ (M.D. Chulkov)”, in XVIII vek: Stat’i i materialy [18th century. Articles and materials], iss. 11, Leningrad, USSR, pp. 178–185.
8. Klein, I. (2005), Puti kulturnogo importa: Trudy po russkoi literature XVIII veka [Ways of cultural import. Works on Russian literature 18th century], Yazyki slavyanskoi kul’tury, Moscow, Russia.
9. Lepaludier, L. (2003), “Introduction”, in Métatextualité et métafiction: Théorie et analyses, Nouvelle édition. Presses universitaires de Rennes, Rennes, France, pp. 9–13.
10. Romodanovskaya, E.K. (1999), “On the changes in the genre system during the transition from ancient Russian traditions to modern literature”, in XVIII vek [18th century], iss. 21, Saint Petersburg, Russia, pp. 14–21.
11. Zuseva-Ozkan, V.B. (2021), “Diachronic poetics of metalepsis (based on the material of Russian literature)”, Narratorium, vol. 15, available at: https://narratorium.ru/2021/12/23/%d0%b4%d0%b8%d0%b0%d1%85%d1%80%d0%be%d0%bd%d0%b8%d1%87%d0%b5%d1%81%d0%ba%d0%b0%d1%8f-%d0%bf%d0%be%d1%8d%d1%82%d0%b8%d0%ba%d0%b0-%d0%bc%d0%b5%d1%82%d0%b0%d0%bb%d0%b5%d0%bf%d1%81%d0%b8%d1%81%d0%b0/ (Accessed 5 Feb. 2024).
Review
For citations:
Deikun I.D. Metafictional commentary of auctorial narrator in Mikhail Chulkov’s “Mocker”. RSUH/RGGU Bulletin: “Literary Teory. Linguistics. Cultural Studies”, Series. 2024;(3):42-50. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.28995/2686-7249-2024-3-42-50
Views:
68
Email this article 