“Who killed?”. From textological research to the diary of D.S. Merezhkovsky “It Was and Will Be” (1915)
https://doi.org/10.28995/2686-7249-2024-3-78-91
- Р Р‡.МессенРТвЂВВВВВВВВжер
- РћРТвЂВВВВВВВВнокласснРСвЂВВВВВВВВРєРСвЂВВВВВВВВ
- LiveJournal
- Telegram
- ВКонтакте
- РЎРєРѕРїРСвЂВВВВВВВВровать ссылку
Full Text:
Abstract
The article considers for the first time the note by D.S. Merezhkovsky “Who killed?” (1913), which is included by the author in the collection “It Was and Will Be.Diary. 1910–1914” (1915). The note is considered from the point of view of textual criticism and real commentary. Based on archival materials from the RO IRLI (Pushkin House) of the Russian Academy of Sciences, the cropped fragment of the text is reconstructed and its dating is specified. Appeal to the newspapers of the period of the trial in the sensational “Beilis case” (“Birzhevye vedomosti”, “Den’”, “Zemshchina”, “Kievlyanin”, “Novoe vremya”, “Rech’”, “Russkie vedomosti”, “Russkoe slovo”, “Utro Rossii”) made it possible to comment on the religious-philosophical, socio-political and legal contexts of the note by D.S. Merezhkovsky. It helped to get closer to establishing its pretexts, previously unknown, and to concretize the sources that the writer used in polemics with his contemporaries, primarily with V.V. Rozanov. Thanks to the periodicals, it was also possible to restore the content and course of the meeting of the St. Petersburg Religious-Philosophical Society of October 19 (November 1), 1913, at which D.S. Merezhkovsky made the report “On the Relation of the Old Testament to Christianity”, which is directly associated with the history of the text “Who killed?”.
About the Author
A. A. KholikovRussian Federation
Alexei A. Kholikov, Dr. of Sci. (Philology), associate professor
1, Leninskie Gory, Moscow, 119991
25a, Povarskaya St., Moscow, 121069
References
1. Ermichev, A.A. (2007), Religiozno-filosofskoe obshchestvo v Peterburge (1907-1917): Khronika zasedanii [Religious and Philosophical Society in St. Petersburg (1907-1917). Chronicle of meetings], Izdatel’stvo S.-Peterburgskogo universiteta, Saint Petersburg, Russia.
2. Ivanova, Evg. (1990), “About the exclusion of V.V. Rozanov from the Religious and Philosophical Society”, Nash Sovremennik, no. 10, pp. 104-122.
3. Katsis, L. (1993), “ ‘The Beilis case’ in the context of the ‘Silver Age’ ”, Vestnik Evreiskogo Universiteta v Moskve, no. 4, pp. 119-140.
4. Katsis, L.F. (2006), Krovavyi navet i russkaya mysl’: istoriko-teologicheskoe issledovanie dela Beilisa [Blood libel and Russian thought. A historical and theological study of the Beilis case], Mosty kul’tury, Moscow, Russia, Gesharim, Ierusalim, Israel.
5. Lavrov, A. (2009), “Issues of scientific publication of the creative heritage of Russian writers in the early 20th century”, in Kornienko, N.V., ed., Tekstologicheskii vremennik. Russkaya literatura XX veka: Voprosy tekstologii i istochnikovedeniya [Textological chronicle. Russian literature of the 20th century. Issues of textual and source studies], IMLI RAN, Moscow, Russia, pp. 22-34.
6. Tager, A.S. (1933), Tsarskaya Rossiya i delo Beilisa: K istorii antisemitizma: Issledovanie po neopublikovannym arkhivnym dokumentam [Tsarist Russia and the Beilis case. On the history of anti-semitism. A study on unpublished archival documents], Sovetskoe zakonodatel’stvo, Moscow, USSR.
Review
For citations:
Kholikov A.A. “Who killed?”. From textological research to the diary of D.S. Merezhkovsky “It Was and Will Be” (1915). RSUH/RGGU Bulletin: “Literary Teory. Linguistics. Cultural Studies”, Series. 2024;(3):78-91. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.28995/2686-7249-2024-3-78-91