Preview

RSUH/RGGU Bulletin: “Literary Teory. Linguistics. Cultural Studies”, Series

Advanced search

On genetic links of F.A. Iskander’s works

https://doi.org/10.28995/2686-7249-2024-3-147-154

Abstract

The article deals with the analysis of opinions of F.A. Iskander on writers, which he made in his short prose of the post-Soviet period. The object of the study is small prose works published in thick literary magazines in the period from 1996 to 2006. Through an intertextual approach and content analysis, precedent names are identified: in addition to Pushkin, Tolstoy, the writer’s reviews of Lermontov, Dostoevsky, Chekhov, Rozanov, as well as Shakespeare, Goethe, Kipling and Darwin are analyzed. According to the results of the study, the following conclusions were made. Firstly, English literature as important to Iskander as Russian. Secondly, the dynamics in the writer’s humanistic views are noted, as evidenced by the changes in the assessment of Russian authors and the theory of evolution. Iskander believes in improving people, but with age he came to realize that it’s a very long process. Thirdly, with the help of a comparison of the most significant authors for Iskander, the key features for his work are revealed: the opposition of the West and the East, interest in evolutionary teachings, generalization, historicism, weakened didacticism. In terms of the genre, Iskander and his significant authors share an interest in complex prose genres, namely a novel in short stories and a collection of short stories.

About the Author

M. M. Kirova
Lomonosov Moscow State University
Russian Federation

Maria M. Kirova, postgraduate student

bldg. 51, bld. 1, Kolmogorova St., Moscow, 119991



References

1. Beer, G. (2009), Darwin’s plots. Evolutionary narrative in Darwin. George Eliot and 19th century fiction, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.

2. Genis, A.A. (2019), “Columbus of Abkhazia”, Vestnik Literaturnogo instituta imeni A.M. Gor’kogo, no. 4. pp. 13–24.

3. Glazkova, M.M. (2019), “Multidimensionality of Fazil Iskander in world literary studies”, Filologiya: nauchnye issledovaniya, no. 4, pp. 57–71, DOI: 10.7256/2454-0749.2019.4.30449.

4. Glick, T.F. and Shaffer, E. (2014), The literary and cultural reception of Charles Darwin in Europe, Bloomsbury, London, UK.

5. Ivanova, N.B. (1990), Smekh protiv straha ili Fazil’ Iskander [Laugh against fear or Fazil Iskander], Sovetskii pisatel‘, Moscow, USSR.

6. Kirova, M.M. (2023), “Reception of the theory of evolution in the late period of F.A. Iskander’s work”, Materialy Mezhdunarodnogo molodezhnogo nauchnogo foruma “Lomonosov-2023”, [Proceedings of the International Scientific Conference for Undergraduate and Graduate Students and Young Scientists “Lomonosov–2023”], available at: https://lomonosov-msu.ru/archive/Lomonosov_2023/data/28649/uid246193_4e8f77e518ab3b643ff596192fba546b76442a98.doc (Accessed 25 Oct. 2023).

7. Nikolaeva, I.A. (2019), “The fable embodiment of good and evil in Fazil Iskander’s parable ‘Rabbits and Boa Constrictors’ ”, Vestnik Literaturnogo instituta imeni A.M. Gor’kogo, no. 4, pp. 64–68.

8. Taragara, Yu. (2018), “Intertext in F. Iskander’s narrative ‘Chik and Pushkin’ ”, Yazyk. Kul’tura. Kommunikatsii, no. 2, available at: https://journals.susu.ru/lcc/article/view/643/774 (Accessed 15 Dec. 2023).

9. Zholkovsky, A.K. (1999), “Face to face with the ruler. From the history of a ‘Pushkin’ paradigm”, in Pushkinskaya konferentsiya v Stenforde, 1999: Materialy i issledovaniya [The Pushkin Conference at Stanford. 1999. Materials and research], available at: https://www.ruthenia.ru/document/532193.html (Accessed 15 Dec 2023).


Review

For citations:


Kirova M.M. On genetic links of F.A. Iskander’s works. RSUH/RGGU Bulletin: “Literary Teory. Linguistics. Cultural Studies”, Series. 2024;(3):147-154. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.28995/2686-7249-2024-3-147-154

Views: 147


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2073-6355 (Print)