Clichéd compliments in manipulative discourse. Cognitive-pragmatic aspect
https://doi.org/10.28995/2686-7249-2024-8-30-41
Abstract
The article addresses the issue of the cognitive-pragmatic approach to the complimentary expressive influctive speech acts. We aim to identify structural models for constructing these statements and the conceptual/cognitive structures underlying them. We argue that a compliment by its nature is a clichéd speech act. We also argue that a compliment has an ambivalent nature and can be used not only with the intention of praise and respect as an element of etiquette, but also with the intention of flattery, correlating with the axiological binary opposition “truth – lie”. In that case, compliment will be involved in the manipulation process. We state that a compliment forms the basis for the category of influctivity due to the fact that it contains emotional and evaluative vocabulary. If a compliment is used with the intention of flattery, the epistemic guarantee is lost, which leads to a manipulative effect on the addressee. During the analysis, the most frequent syntactic models are identified, confirming the clichéd nature of compliments. We draw on the English language material analysis. We prove that flattering compliments are based on a configuration of frames such as “manipulation, trust, control, comfort”, etc. Within such configuration there is a dynamic interaction based on the mechanisms of conceptual projection.
Keywords
About the Authors
Vera I. ZabotkinaRussian Federation
Vera I. Zabotkina, Dr. of Sci. (Philology), professor,
bld. 6, Miusskaya Square, Moscow, 125047.
Natalia A. Kurakina
Russian Federation
Natalia A. Kurakina, Cand. of Sci. (Philology), associate professor,
bld. 14, A. Nevskogo Street, Kaliningrad, 236041.
References
1. Dem’yankov, V.Z. (2023), “Communicative and cognitive maneuvering”, Kognitivnye issledovaniya yazyka [Cognitive studies of language], Izdatel’skii dom “Derzhavinskii”, Tambov, Russia, pp. 36–40.
2. Kahneman, D. (2016), Dumai medlenno... reshai bystro [Think slow... decide quickly], AST, Moscow, Russia.
3. Searle, J.R. (1965), “What is a Speech Act?”, Black, M. (ed.), Philosophy in America, Alien and Unwin, London, UK, pp. 221-239.
4. Teliya, V.N. (1991), “Expression as a manifestation of the subjective factor in language and its pragmatic orientation”, Chelovecheskii faktor v yazyke. Yazykovye mekhanizmy ekspressivnosti [The human factor in language. Language mechanisms of expression], Nauka, Moscow, Russia, pp. 14–56.
5. Vanderveken, D. (1988), Les actes de discours: Essai de philosophic du langage et de l’esprit sur la signification des enonciations, Mardaga, Bruxelles, Belgium.
6. Zabotkina, V.I. (2023), “Cognitive mechanisms of manipulative influence in media discourse”, Kognitivnye issledovaniya yazyka [Cognitive studies of language], Izdatel’skii dom “Derzhavinskii”, Tambov, Russia, pp. 43–47.
Review
For citations:
Zabotkina V.I., Kurakina N.A. Clichéd compliments in manipulative discourse. Cognitive-pragmatic aspect. RSUH/RGGU Bulletin: “Literary Teory. Linguistics. Cultural Studies”, Series. 2024;(8):30-41. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.28995/2686-7249-2024-8-30-41