Dephraseologization of dialogic cliché as a way to grammaticalization

The article analyzes the current problematic of dialogic cliché. Such type of phraseological language units is a sort of syntactic phraseologisms – so called phraseological schemes, the undivided communicative units. Their peculiarity of dialogic clichés of that type lies in the pronoun inclusions they contain, which stipulate certain specificity of such units. These language units are nowаdays subjects of lexicographical, dictionaries’ description. In the article the attention is paid to the parts of such phraseological units, e. g. the forms of Dativus Ethicus) in Slavic languages which succeed the Latin tradition, so that they are included into morphologic paradigms of pronouns. Such way they gain the status of grammar units, but not dictionary ones. On the base of the analysis it is asserted that apparent contradiction in the interpretation and qualification of such structures as objects of dictionary description and, at the same time, elements of grammar is caused by practical convenience and the existing pragmatics of their grammatical and linguodidactic description as the members of morphologic paradigms. In the central position are the issues of interpretation and qualification of such structures, differences of their types, the degree of their phraseological and grammatical content. In the article the material of Russian and some other Slavic languages is used.

1. Bańko, M. (2001), Z pogranicza leksykografii i językoznawstwa [From the boundaries of lexicography and linguistics], Wydział polonistyki Uniwersytetu Warszawskiego, Warsaw, Poland.

2. Bauer, J. and Grempl, M. (1965), Skladba spisovné češtiny [Syntax of contemporary Chech language], Statní pedagogické nakladatelství, Prague, Czechia.

3. Bulygina, T.V. and Shmelev, A.D. (1997), Yazykovaya kartina mira (na materiale russkoi grammatiki) [The linguistic worldview (on the material of Russian grammar)], Shkola: “Yazyki russkoj kul’tury”, Moscow, Russia.

4. Daković, S. (2013), “Dativus Ethicus w języku chorwackim i polskim” [Dativus ethicus in Croatian and Polish], in Fordoński, K. and Karpiński, Ł (ed.), W dialogu języków i kultur III, Warsaw, Poland.

5. El’zbutas, Yu.V. (1967), “Dativus ethicus in contemporary Russian and Lithuanian language”, Filologicheskie nauki, no. 3, pp. 3–13.

6. Filimonova, E.Yu. (2021), “Ethical Dative and Prepositional Genitive in Conflictinducing Phrases in Russian”, Rhema. Rema, no. 2, pp. 149–170, available at: https://elibrary.ru/xw6ppq/rhema-journal.com/Rhema_2021_2_Filimonova.pdf (Accessed 11 November 2023).

7. Koneczna, H. (1938), “About Dativus convencionalis in Polish language”, Poradnik Językowy, no. 7, pp. 109–111.

8. Kul’pina, V.G. (1979), “The comparison of functioning of substantives and personal pronouns’ case forms (on the material of Polish language)”, Vestnik Moskovskogo universiteta, no. 3, pp. 36–46.

9. Kul’pina, V.G. (2009), “The contemporary trends in lexicography of the pronoun class (on the material of Polish and Russian languages)”, Krasnyh, V.V., Izotov, A.I. and Kul’pina, V.G. (eds.), Yazyk, soznanie, kommunikatsiya: Sb. nauch. statei, posvyashchennyi pamyati zasluzhennogo professora MGU Aleksandry Grigor’evny Shirokovoi [Language, consciousness, communication. Collection of scientific articles commemorating Aleksandra Grigorievna Shirokova, Honored Professor of MSU], MAKS Press, Moscow, Russia, iss. 38, pp. 124–134.

10. Kul’pina, V.G. (2022), “Pragmatics of personal pronouns in the structure of pronoun complexes and dialog unities”, RSUH/RGGU Bulletin “Literary Theory. Linguistics. Cultural Studies” Series, no. 8, part 1, pp. 111–135.

11. Kul’pina, V.G., (2023), “ Semantics and pragmatics of pronouns’ class in the works of Ol’ga Pavlovna Ermakova”, Eremin, A.N. and others (ed. board), Semantika i pragmatika yazykovykh edinic raznykh urovnei: doklady Mezhd. nauchn. konferentsii, posv. pamyati d.f.n. prof. Ol’gi Pavlovny Ermakovoi [Semantics and pragmatics of linguistic units of different levels . Reports of the International Conference in Memory of Dr. Olga Pavlovna Ermakova], KGU im. K.E. Tsiolkovskogo, Kaluga, Russia, pp. 181–187.

12. Kustova, G.I. (2011), Obshchaya kharakteristika padezhnoi sistemy [The general characteristics of case system], available at: https://rusgram.ru/chapter/label/Padezh (Accessed 20 Sept 2023).

13. Lyutikova, E.A. (2017), Formal’nye modeli padezha. Teorii i prilozheniya [The formal models of case. Theories and appositions], Izdatel’skii dom YaSK, Moscow, Russia.

14. Mashovec, E.N., (2000), Constructions of dativus ethicus in modern Russian language, Abstract of Ph.D dissertation. Saratov, Russia.

15. Melikyan, V.Yu (2019), Sintaksicheskie frazeologicheskie edinitsy: frazeosintaksicheskie skhemy, monograph [The syntactic phraseological units. Phraseological schemes. Monograph], Donizdat, Rostov-on-Don, Russia.

16. Melikyan, V.Yu. and Melikyan, A.V. (2022) “Fixed phrase schemes as the ‘results’ of grammaticalization process”, Voprosy kognitivnoi lingvistiki, no. 4, pp. 102–114.

17. Mirowicz, A. (1950), “Comments on the occasion of dictionary work”, Pamiętnik Literacki, no. 41/2, pp. 485–491, available at: https://bazhum.muzhp.pl/media/files/Pamietnik-Literacki (Accessed 8 November 2023).

18. Plungyan, V.A. (2011), Vvedenie v grammaticheskuyu semantiku: grammaticheskie znacheniya i grammaticheskie sistemy yazykov mira [Introduction to grammatical semantics. Grammatical meanings and grammatical systems of world languages], RGGU, Moscow, Russia.

19. Solomkina, N.A. and Podlesskaya, V.I. (2016), “Benefactive constructions in Japanese language as a peculiarity of contemporary usage”, Iwanowski, M.A.(ed.), Opuscula Iaponica et Slavica, vol. III. BEL Studio, Warszaw, Poland, pp. 23–36.

20. Shvedova, N.Yu. (1998), Mestoimenie i smysl. Klass russkikh mestoimenii i otkryvaemye imi smyslovye prostranstva [Pronoun and sense. Class of Russian pronouns and the meaning spaces they open up], Azbukovnik, Moscow, Russia.

21. Shmelev, D.N. (1976), Sintaksicheskaya chlenimost’ vyskazyvaniya v sovremennom russkom yazyke [The syntactic articulation of utterance in modern Russian], AN SSSR, Moscow, Russia.