Preview

RSUH/RGGU Bulletin: “Literary Teory. Linguistics. Cultural Studies”, Series

Advanced search

The Devil was her Deity: Witchraft and folk religion in York County, South Carolina, in the 18th – 19th centuries

https://doi.org/10.28995/2686-7249-2025-1-36-51

Abstract

The notions of sorcery and witchcraft exist, in some way, in most human societies, and are often intrinsically connected with religion, or at least with the complex of ideas, concepts and practices usually referred to as folk religion. The specifics of folk religiosity in Southern colonies and later Southern states of the US, are under-researched in some aspects – while contemporary syncretic religions are explored in great detail, folk religion of the colonial period remains somewhat underexplored, mostly due to insufficient sources. However, it can be reconstructed, at least to some degree, using materials collected by members of local elites interested in local history and ethnography. This article examines the ideas of witchcraft in York County, South Carolina, in the 18th – 19th centuries. The key questions touch upon are the local specifics in comparison to wider colonial culture, the evolution of the ideas of witchcraft in the late colonial and early independence period, and the influence of folk religion on the emergence of specific southern religiosity.

About the Author

G. V. Aleksandrov
HSE University
Russian Federation

Gleb V. Aleksandrov, Cand. of Sci (History)

21/4, Staraya Basmannaya St., Moscow, 105066



References

1. Aleksandrov, G.V. (2020), “ ‘The Long-Lost Friend’. The witchcraft and healing among Pennsylvanian Germans in the 20th and 21st centuries”, in In Umbra: Demonologiya kak semioticheskaya sistema: Al’manakh [In Umbra. Demonology as a semiotic system], iss. 9, Moscow, pp. 213–237.

2. Ankarloo, B. and Clark, S., eds. (2002), Witchcraft and magic in Europe, vol. 6, University of Pennsylvania Press, Philadelphia, USA.

3. Breslaw, E. (1996), Tituba, the reluctant witch of Salem, New York University Press, New York, USA, London, UK.

4. Briggs, R. (2002), Witches and neighbours. The social and cultural context of European witchcraft, Penguin, New York, USA.

5. Bruce, D.D. (1974), “Religion, society and culture in the Old South. A comparative view”, American Quarterly, vol. 26, no. 4, pp. 399–416.

6. Butler, J. (1979), “Magic, astrology, and the early American religious heritage, 1600–1760”, The American Historical Review, vol. 84, no. 2, pp. 317–346.

7. Demos, J. (2004), Entertaining Satan. Witchcraft and the culture of early New England, Oxford University Press, Oxford, New York, USA.

8. Dreisbach, D. (2019), “Introduction. Christianity and American law”, in Dreisbach, D. and Hall, M., eds., Great Christian jurists in American history, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.

9. Hall, D (1990), Worlds of wonder, Days of Judgement. Popular religious belief in early New England, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, UK.

10. Khristoforova, O.B. (2011), Kolduny i zhertvy: Antropologiya koldovstva v sovremennoi Rossii [Sorcerers and victims. Antrhopology of sorcery in contemporary Russia], OGI, Moscow, Russia.

11. Ó hÓgáin, D. (1985), The hero in Irish folk history, Gill and Macmillan, Dublin, Ireland.

12. Straughn, J.B. and Feld, S.L. (2010), “America as a ‘Christian nation’? Understanding religious boundaries of national identity in the United States”, Sociology of Religion, vol. 71, no. 3, pp. 280–306.

13. Thomas, K. (1971), Religion and the decline of magic. Studies in popular beliefs in 16th and 17th-century England, Weidenfeld and Nicolson, London, UK.

14. Varul, M. (2015), “Consumerism as folk religion. Transcendence, probation and dissatisfaction with capitalism”, Studies in Christian Ethics, vol. 28, no. 4, pp. 447– 460.

15. Yoder, D. (1974), “Toward a definition of folk religion”, Western Folklore, vol. 33, no. 1, pp. 1–15.


Review

For citations:


Aleksandrov G.V. The Devil was her Deity: Witchraft and folk religion in York County, South Carolina, in the 18th – 19th centuries. RSUH/RGGU Bulletin: “Literary Teory. Linguistics. Cultural Studies”, Series. 2025;(1):36-51. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.28995/2686-7249-2025-1-36-51

Views: 41


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2073-6355 (Print)