Preview

RSUH/RGGU Bulletin: “Literary Teory. Linguistics. Cultural Studies”, Series

Advanced search

Study of framing of parliamentary rhetoric using machine analysis methods

https://doi.org/10.28995/2686-7249-2024-12-132-142

Abstract

   The study of political discourse, as well as the rhetoric of politicians, is a field of knowledge standing at the intersection of linguistics and political science. Our research is based on the critical discourse analysis, which is realized with the help of methods of natural language processing by computer programs, in particular by artificial intelligence (by creating a concordance dictionary, using the methods of distributive semantics, searching for word-associates and frequency dictionaries).

   The aim of the work is to identify the rhetorical constructs special for the discourse, used in practice by the State Duma deputies to create a special agenda.

   The study was conducted on the material of transcripts for all sessions of the State Duma of the Russian Federation of the 7th and 8th convocations (from 2016 to 2022).

   The relevance of the study is related to the attempt in applying the latest technologies in the description of discourse.

   The results of the study are presented in the form of describing the characterization of speech constructs, identifying the deputies’ attitudes towards the topics and outlining the mental constructs expressed by the State Duma deputies.

About the Author

A. A. Niyazov
Novosibirsk State University
Russian Federation

Anton A. Niyazov, postgraduate student

630090; 1, Pirogova St.; Novosibirsk



References

1. Chudinov, A.P., ed. (2016), Teoriya i metodika lingvisticheskogo analiza politicheskogo teksta [Theory and methods of linguistic analysis of political text], Ural’skii gosudarstvennyi pedagogicheskii universitet, Ekaterinburg, Russia.

2. Dominikan, A.I. (2016), “Concordance as a tool for learning the meaning of a word”, Vestnik Tverskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Seriya: Filologiya, no. 4, pp. 85–89.

3. Karaulov, Yu.N. (2007), Russkii yazyk i yazykovaya lichnost’ [Russian language and linguistic personality], Izdatel’stvo LKI, Moscow, Russia.

4. Kuoksa, L. (2021), Ritoricheskie sredstva vozdeistviya v rossiiskikh predvybornykh rolikakh pri vyborakh v Gosudarstvennuyu dumu v 2016 g. [Rhetorical means of influence in Russian election commercials during the 2016 State Duma elections], Universitet Tampere, Tampere, Finland.

5. Niyazov, A.A. (2023), “Natural language processing technologies as a tool for analyzing parliamentary rhetoric”, in Materialy 61-i Mezhdunarodnoi nauchnoi studencheskoi konferentsii MNSK-2023. Zhurnalistika [Proceedings of the 61<sup>st</sup> International scientific student conference MNSC-2023. Journalism], NGU, Novosibirsk, Russia.

6. Parshina, O.N. (2007), Rossiĭskaya politicheskaya rech’: Teoriya i praktika [Russian political speech. Theory and practice], LKI, Moscow, Russia.

7. Ruzhentseva, N.B. (2018), “Political and communication strategies in printed election materials 2018”, Political Linguistics Journal, no. 2, pp. 18–28.

8. Shmatko, N.A., ed. (1999), Poetika i politika. Al’manakh Rossiisko-frantsuzskogo tsentra sotsiologii i filosofii Instituta sotsiologii Rossiiskoi Akademii nauk [Poetics and politics. Almanac of the Russian-French center for sociology and philosophy of the Institute of Sociology of the Russian Academy of Sciences], Aleteya, Moscow, Russia.

9. Smirenskii, V.B. (2000), Slovo v deistvii: intent-analiz politicheskogo diskursa [Word in action. Intent analysis of political discourse], Saint Petersburg, Russia.


Review

For citations:


Niyazov A.A. Study of framing of parliamentary rhetoric using machine analysis methods. RSUH/RGGU Bulletin: “Literary Teory. Linguistics. Cultural Studies”, Series. 2024;(12):132-142. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.28995/2686-7249-2024-12-132-142

Views: 48


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2073-6355 (Print)