.png)
.png)
Email this article 
New rurality as constructed by townspeople. A case of the Pyalma historical village in Karelia
https://doi.org/10.28995/2686-7249-2025-4-125-160
Abstract
On the example of the Karelian village of Pyalma the article considers the construction of the image of a traditional Northern Russian village by former and current townspeople. Based on their own ideas about the authenticity of the rural, they represent that rural tradition to urban tourists, whose knowledge of the rural is predominantly mediated by popular culture and is not supported by practical skills and abilities. By comparing the history of Pyalma and other examples of contemporary public work with natural and cultural heritage in Northwest Russia, it is shown that the typification and museumification of traditional rurality, characteristic today for many regions, is largely due to the individual desire to preserve the villages and ensure their development by attracting tourists and activities in the space of the “impression economy”. It is noted that for the majority of “seasonal” residents of such settlements, whether they are local or urban summer residents, the historicity of the place is not of fundamental importance, in contrast to the natural and infrastructural features of the location of a particular village. It is concluded that urban projections of rurality in historical settlements, seen today, are gradually more and more clearly subdivided into common and private commemorative-tourist and personal economic practices, which together form a post-productivist “new rurality” of historical villages in the Russian North.
About the Author
Ciril M. KorolevRussian Federation
Сiril M. Korolev, Cand. of Sci. (Philology),
32-A, Leninskii Av., Moscow, 119334.
References
1. Afanas’ev, Yu.N., ed. (1995), Sud’by rossiiskogo krest’yanstva [Destinies of Russian peasantry], RGGU, Moscow, Russia.
2. Akhmetova, M.V., Petrov, N.V. and Baiduzh, M.I., eds. (2018), Voobrazhaemaya territoriya: ot lokal’noi identichnosti do brenda [The imaginable territory – from local identity to a brand], Neolit, Moscow, Russia.
3. Alekseev, A.I., Vasil’eva, O.E. and Udovenko, V.S. (2020), “A rural way of life. A study of small villages in the Leningrad region”, Vestnik Sankt-Peterburgskogo universiteta. Nauki o Zemle, vol. 65, no. 3, pp. 468–480.
4. Arkhipova, M.N. (2018), “A phenomena of nostalgy by the example of residents in the Ustiansky district of the Arkhangelsk region”, Istoricheskie issledovaniya: Zhurnal istoricheskogo fakul’teta MGU imeni M.V. Lomonosova, vol. 11, no. 3, pp. 122–131, available at: http://www.historystudies.msu.ru/ojs2/index.php/ISIS/article/ view/200/496 (Accessed 17 Oct. 2024).
5. Averkieva, K.V. (2020), “Participation of city dwellers in rural development. Guest houses of the Russian North”, Vestnik Moskovskogo universiteta. Seriya 5. Geografiya, no. 2, pp. 66–72.
6. Bogdanova, E. and Brednikova, O., eds. (2013), Vdali ot gorodov: zhizn’ postsovetskoi derevni [Far from cities. The life of the post-Soviet villages], Aleteiya, Istoricheskaya kniga, Saint Petersburg, Russia.
7. Bourdieu, P. (2007), Sotsiologiya sotsial’nogo prostranstva [Ce que parler veut dire: l’économie des échanges linguistiques], Aleteiya, Saint Petersburg, Russia.
8. Cherkaeva, O.E. (2019), “The modern museum landscape and some new trends in museum activities”, Vestnik Sankt-Peterburgskogo gosudarstvennogo instituta kul’tury, vol. 41, no. 4, pp. 131–136.
9. Chernega, A.A. (2020), “ ‘The power of local communities’. Practices, tools and schemes of local participation in the sociocultural territory development (small localities of the Vologda region)”, The Journal of Sociologii and Social Antropology, vol. 23, no. 3, pp. 51–77.
10. Chernov, S.Z. (2021), “Two graveyards, one tribe. A paper of 1375 and mechanisms of Vepps colonization of the Novgorod Obonezh’je”, in Rus’ v XIII–XV vv.: Novye otkrytiya v oblasti arkheologii i istorii [Russia in the 13th – 15th centuris. New discoveries of archeology and history], Institut arkheologii RAN, Institut rossiiskoi istorii RAN, Indrik, Moscow, Russia, pp. 119–153.
11. Darieva, T., Muhlfried, F., Tuite, K., eds. (2018), Sacred Places, Emerging Spaces: Religious Pluralism in the Post-Soviet Caucasus, Berghahn Books, N.Y. and Oxford, UK.
12. Deitch, L. (1987), “The impact of tourism on the arts and crafts of the Indians of the Southwestern United States”, in Smith, V.L., ed., Hosts and guests. The anthropology of tourism, University of Pennsylvania Press, Philadelphia, USA, pp. 223–236.
13. Drannikova, N.V. (2017), “ ‘Patrakeevka is a Pomor village’. Specifics of local identity in the Primosky district of the Arkhangelsk region”, Arktika i Sever, no. 28, pp. 5–23.
14. Druchevskaya, L.E. and Avilova, N.L. (2014), “A regional model of a tourist product in the Moscow region – ‘The historical village’”, Servis v Rossii i za rubezhom, vol. 49, no. 2, pp. 3–10.
15. Gavrilova, K.A. (2016), “The return of the popular culture to people. The proper Shrovetide and methodic guidance of rural activities”, Etnograficheskoe obozrenie, no. 6, pp. 27–43.
16. Habeck, J., ed. (2019), Lifestyle in Siberia and the Russian North, Open Book Publ., Cambridge, UK.
17. Horáková, H., Boscoboinik, A. and Smith, R., eds. (2018), Utopia and neoliberalism. Ethnographies of rural spaces, Lit-Verlag, Berlin, Germany.
18. Ilbery, B. and Bowler, I. (1998), “From agricultural productivism to post-productivism”, in The geography of rural change, Longman, Harlow, UK, pp. 57–84.
19. Ivanova, A.A. (2019), “ ‘Talking knots’ of local identity. To the modern forms of historical, ethnic and culture representation by the local community”, in Kenozerskie chteniya – 2019: Grazhdanskie initsiativy v zapovednom uklade: sbornik materialov IX Vserossiiskoi nauchno-prakticheskoi konferentsii s mezhdunarodnym uchastiem, Natsional’nyi park “Kenozerskii”, Arkhangelsk, Russia, pp. 161–171.
20. Kalugina, Z.I. and Fadeeva, O.P. (2009), Rossiiskaya derevnya v labirinte reform: Sotsiologicheskie zarisovki [The Russian village in the labyrinth of reforms. Sociological scenes], Izdatel’stvo IEOPP SO RAN, Novosibirsk, Russia.
21. Koloskov, E.A. (2021), (War-) and historical reconstruction in Russia as a symbol of the past in the memory politics”, in Simvolicheskie aspekty politiki pamyati v sovremennoi Rossii i Vostochnoi Evrope [Symbolic aspects of memory politics in contemporary Russia and Eastern Europe], Izdatel’stvo Evropeiskogo universiteta, Saint Petersburg, Russia, pp. 213–233.
22. Korolev, С.M. (2018), “Problematics in the activities of non-state museums in the North-West”, Prostranstvo pamyati, vol. 7, no. 3–4, pp. 7–13, available at: http:// patriacenter.ru/mag/ (Accessed 6 Dec. 2023).
23. Korolev, C.M. (2019), Poiski natsional’noi identichnosti v sovetskoi i postsovetskoi massovoi kul’ture: Slavyanskii metasyuzhet v otechestvennom kul’turnom prostranstve [The quest for national identity in the Soviet and post-Soviet popular culture. The Slavic metaplot in the Russian cultural space], Nestor-Istoriya, Saint Petersburg, Russia.
24. Korolev, C.M. (2021), “ ‘The return of history’. Public museum initiatives through the lens of memory politics”, Simvolicheskie aspekty politiki pamyati v sovremennoi Rossii i Vostochnoi Evrope [Symbolic aspects of memory politics in contemporary Russia and Eastern Europe], Izdatel’stvo Evropeiskogo universiteta, Saint Petersburg, Russia, pp. 199–213.
25. Kovalev, I.V. (2009), “On the directions of migration for rural population in the Russian Federation”, Vestnik Sankt-Peterburgskogo universiteta. Sotsiologiya, no. 3–1, pp. 70–76.
26. Kupriyanov, P.S. and Savina, N.A. (2020), “A modern museum of the Russian village. The production of rural life by former city dwellers”, Etnograficheskoe obozrenie, no. 6, pp. 12–30.
27. Lebedev, A.V. (2007), “The apparently shallow waters (two notes to the issue of museums and local communities)”, Muzei i lichnost’: Metodicheskie materialy dlya muzeev Moskovskoi oblasti [A museum and a personality. Methodic materials for the Moscow region museums], RIK, Ministerstvo kul’tury MO, Moscow, Russia, pp. 127–135.
28. MacCannell, D. (1976), The tourist. A new theory of the leisure class, Schocken books, New York, USA.
29. Manakov, A.G. (2002), Geokul’turnoe prostranstvo severo-zapada Russkoi ravniny: dinamika, struktura, ierarkhiya [The geocultural space of the North-Western Russian plain. Dynamics, structure and hierarchy], sentr sotsial’nogo proektirovaniya “Vozrozhdenie”, Pskov, Russia.
30. Mastenitsa, E.N. (2020), “Sociocultural practices of museums in the Russian towns as a factor of regional development”, Obshchestvo. Sreda. Razvitie (Terra Humana), vol. 55, no. 2, pp. 72–78.
31. Mazur, L.N. (2005), “The politics of restoration in the Russian villages (the end of 1950s – 1980s)”, Otechestvennaya istoriya, no. 3, pp. 25–36.
32. Mel’nikova, E.A. (2019), “ ‘The Russian spirit is here’. On the history of the Russian North in symbolic map of imaginable Russia”, Kunstkamera, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 6–22.
33. Mel’nikova, E.A. (2020), “A village in urban projections of the modern Russian people”, Etnograficheskoe obozrenie, no. 6, pp. 5–11.
34. Mel’nikova, E.A. (2020), “Life stories of city-to-village migrations and rhetoric of self-transformation in the modern Russia], Etnograficheskoe obozrenie, no. 6, pp. 88–105.
35. Milano, C., Novelli, M. and Cheer, J.M. (2019). “Overtourism and degrowth. A social movement perspective”, Journal of Sustainable Tourism, no. 27, pp. 18–58.
36. Mironova, N.I. (2010), “Sociocultural processes in forming the local communities (on the base of some pilot studies)”, in Reznik, Yu.M. and Mironova, N.I., eds., Mestnye soobshchestva: problemy sotsiokul’turnogo razvitiya [Local communities. Trends of sociocultural development], RIK, Moscow, Russia, pp. 136–179.
37. Morozova, T.V. (2006), “Mechanisms of social self-organization in rural communities. The results of studying the social partnership in the Republic of Karelia”, in Trudy Karel’skogo nauchnogo tsentra RAN [Works of the Karelia RAS Science Center], iss. 9, Petrozavodsk, Russia, pp. 162–174.
38. Nagurnaya, S.V. (2019), “The cultural heritage of a vanished village beyond the Onega lake”, Vestnik slavyanskikh kul’tur, vol. 51, no. 1, pp. 116–124.
39. Nefedova, T.G. (2013), Desyat’ aktual’nykh voprosov o sel’skoi Rossii: otvety geografa [Ten current questions on the rural Russia. Answers by a geographer], Lenand, Moscow, Russia.
40. Nefedova, T.G. (2019), “Development of the post-Soviet agrarian sector and polarization of rural space in the European part of Russia”, Spatial Economics, vol. 15, no. 4, pp. 36–56.
41. Neplyuev, P.A. (2020), “ ‘If one is indifferent to the heritage of his country, he is indifferent to his country’. A historiographical overview of historical and cultural activism in the post-Soviet period”, Kul’turnyi kod, no. 3, pp. 38–49.
42. Nikiforova, E. (2012), “ ‘The beauty sellers’. Notes to the re-branding of an Estonian village”, in Vdali ot gorodov: Zhizn’ postsovetskoi derevni [Away from cities. Post-Soviet rural landscapes], GRTsRF, Moscow, Russia.
43. Osipov, A.Yu., Lyakhteenmyaki, M., Ilmolakhti, O. and Karkhu, Ya. (2019), “Commodification of the nature. The Ladoga skerries national park”, Universe of Russia, vol. 28, no. 3, pp. 113–131.
44. Oushakine, S. (2007), “ ‘We’re nostalgic but we’re not crazy’. Retrofitting the past in Russia”, The Russian Review, vol. 66, no. 3, pp. 451–482.
45. Panzer-Krause, S. (2019), “The lost rural idyll? Tourists’ attitudes towards sustainability and their influence on the production of rural space at a rural tourism hotspot in Northern Ireland”, Journal of Rural Studies, vol. 80. pp. 234–245.
46. Paxson, M. (2005), Solovyovo, The story of memory in a Russian village, Woodrow Wilson Center Press, Washington, DC, distributed by Indiana University Press, USA.
47. Permilovskaya, A.B. (2011), “The issue of cultural landscapes preservation in the historical Russian North villages”, Regionologiya, vol. 75, no. 2, pp. 313–324.
48. Petrikov, A.V. (2020), “Will the pandemic be a catalyzer of de-urbanization?”, in Nauchnye trudy Vol’nogo ekonomicheskogo obshchestva Rossii [Scientific works of the Russian Free Economic Society], vol. 223, no. 3, pp. 154–164.
49. Petrova, N.S. (2013), “The Kikimora of Vyatka, the Koschey of Tver, or a fake-lore map of Russia”, in Fol’klor XXI veka: Geroi nashego vremeni [Folklore of the 21st century. Heroes of our times], GRTsRF, Moscow, Russia, pp. 30–38.
50. Ponomareva, I.Yu., Tankieva, T.A. and Slemzina, A.O. (2022), “How to increase the attractiveness of small historical places as tourist objects in the Tula region”, Izvestiya Tul’skogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Gumanitarnye nauki, no. 3, pp. 151–164.
51. Prilutskii, A.M. and Lebedev, V.Yu. (2020), “The image of a village in the pseudotradition discourses”, Kul’tura i iskusstvo, no. 2, pp. 34–43.
52. Prokhorovich, E.V. (2017), “Art communications as a factor of local identity”, Tsennosti i smysly, no. 1, pp. 51–57.
53. Razuvalova, A.V. (2015), Pisateli-“derevenshchiki”: literatura i konservativnaya ideologiya 1970-kh gg. [The “village prose” writers. Literature and conservatism in the 1970s], NLO, Moscow, Russia.
54. Rodoman, B.B. (2011), “A traditional cultural landscape. Most profound issues of typology, region specifics and imagination”, Mezhdunarodnyi zhurnal issledovanii kul’tury, vol. 5, no. 4, pp. 47–53.
55. Sel’skaya Rossiya: proshloe i nastoyashchee: doklady i soobshcheniya XV-i nauchnoprakticheskoi konferentsii, posvyashchennoi 30-letiyu obshchestva “Entsiklopediya rossiiskikh dereven’” (Moskva, MGU im. M.V. Lomonosova, 22 oktyabrya 2019 g.) [The rural Russia. The past and the now. Reports and information of the XV scientific-practical Conference on the occasion of the 30th anniversary of the society “Encyclopedia of Russian Villages” (Lomonosov Moscow State University, October 22, 2019). Moscow] (2019), VIAPI im. A.A. Nikonova, Entsiklopediya rossiiskikh dereven’, Moscow, Russia.
56. Selivanenko, A.M. (2015), “An eco-museum in Siberia as a new form of museefication” in Balandinskie chteniya [The Balandin Conference], vol. 10, part 2, pp. 320–324.
57. Shabaev, Yu.P., Zherebtsov, I.L. and Zhuravlev, P.S. (2012), “The Russian North. Cultural limits and meanings”, Universe of Russia. Sotsiologiya. Etnologiya, vol. 21, no. 4, pp. 134–153.
58. Shekhvatova, E.V. (2021), “The current state and prospects of development of Russian private museums”, Uchenye zapiski (Altaiskaya gosudarstvennaya akademiya kul’tury i iskusstv), vol. 30, no. 4, pp. 36–44.
59. Shtyrkov, S.A. (2016), “ ‘A templet over a quiet river’. The classic Russian art and the soviet landscape patriotism”, Etnograficheskoe obozrenie, no. 6, pp. 44–57.
60. Starovoitenko, A.D. (2021, “A ravenge of NOSTOS. On the meaning of a place in the nostalgy studies”, Interaction. Interview. Interpretation, vol. 13, no. 2, pp. 41–53.
61. Usov, A.A. (2021), “A peasant house as a factor of cultural landscape in the Russian North and the Arctic region (village of Purnema)”, Kul’tura i iskusstvo, no. 4, pp. 1–18.
62. Vandyshev, M.N., Veselkova, N.V. and Pryamikova, E.V. (2022), “Memory landscape – a notion and the application”, Sotsiologiya vlasti, vol. 34, no. 1, pp. 69–94.
63. Vinogradskaya, O.Ya. (2018), “The ontological grounds for the move of urban dwellers to villages”, Krest’yanovedenie, vol. 3, no. 4, pp. 123–135.
64. Zhelamskii, A.G. (2018), “The unquenchable homeland. On the subject of artistic landscape perception”, Nasledie i sovremennost’, vol. 1, no. 4, pp. 95–110.
Supplementary files
For citation: Korolev C.M. New rurality as constructed by townspeople. A case of the Pyalma historical village in Karelia. RSUH/RGGU Bulletin: “Literary Teory. Linguistics. Cultural Studies”, Series. 2025;(4):125-160. https://doi.org/10.28995/2686-7249-2025-4-125-160
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
