Preview

RSUH/RGGU Bulletin: “Literary Teory. Linguistics. Cultural Studies”, Series

Advanced search

“School For Fools” as a metafiction. The problem of subjective neosyncretism

https://doi.org/10.28995/2686-7249-2025-2-91-101

Abstract

The article deals with the study of the subjective structure of Sasha Sokolov’s novel “School for Fools”. Using the methodological apparatus of narratology and receptive aesthetics. An attempt is made to analyze the compositional structure of the text in order to describe the so called “subjective neosyncretism” – an aesthetic trend in the literature of the second half of the twentieth century, exacerbating the relationship between the value and narrative instances of the work. The need for such a study is motivated by the complexity of the description of the metafictional structure of the work, undertaken by us for the first time on the basis of the concept of V.B. Zuseva-Ozkan. The main hypothesis of our research is confirmed by a practical analysis in the subject structure of the novel: the fusion of the position of the hero and the author, or, more precisely, their conflict-free identical coexistence as different functions of the work, does not allow us to unambiguously attribute the “School for Fools” to any of the four invariants of the metafiction proposed by Zuseva-Ozkan. It does not create an internal conflict in the mentioned concept, derived from other metafictional material, but allows us, following M. Foucault, to propose a clarifying parameter – the authorship function.

About the Author

Grigorii A. Filippov
Russian State University for the Humanities
Russian Federation

Grigorii A. Filippov, postgraduate student

6, Miusskaya Sq., Moscow, 125047



References

1. Beshukova F.B. (2012), “Polyphonic structure of the postmodern text”, in Aktual’nye problemy literaturovedeniya [Current issues of literary criticism], Izvestiya VGPU, Maykop, Russia. pp. 150–165.

2. Bitov, A. (1989), “The sadness of whole person”, Oktyabr’, no. 3, pp. 157–158.

3. Divakov S.V. (2012), Tvorchestvo Sashi Sokolova: problemy zhanra [Creative work of Sasha Sokolov. Issues of genre], Abstract of Ph.D. dissertation (Philology), TGU, Tver, Russia.

4. Egorov M.Yu. (2015), “‘Non-classical’ world of Sasha Sokolov. Variability of interpretation of ‘School for fools’ ”, Verhnevolzhski philological bulletin, no. 3. pp. 128–132.

5. Epstein, M. (2019), Postmodernizm v Rossii [Postmodernism in Russia], Azbuka, Saint Petersburg, Russia.

6. Izer, V. (2004), “The reading process. A phenomenological approach”, in Sovremennaya literaturnaya teoriya. Antologiya [Modern literary theory. Anthology], Flinta, Nauka, Moscow, Russia.

7. Lipovetskii, M. (1997), Russkii postmodernizm: ocherki istoricheskoi poetiki [Russian postmodernism. Essays on historical poetics], EGU, Ekaterinburg, Russia.

8. Sokruta, Yu.V. (2015), “About the functions of metanarrativity in the modern novel”, in Dialog soglasiya: sbornik nauchnykh statei k 70-letiyu V.I. Tyupy [Dialogue of consent. Collected scientific articles for the 70th anniversary of V.I. Tyupa], Intrada, Moscow, Russia. pp. 151–163.

9. Zhennet, Zh. (1998), Figury [Figures], vol. 2, Izdatel’stvo imeni Sabashnikovykh, Moscow, Russia.

10. Zuseva-Ozkan, V.B. (2014), Istoricheskaya poetika romana [Historical poetics of the novel], Intrada, Moscow, Russia.


Review

For citations:


Filippov G.A. “School For Fools” as a metafiction. The problem of subjective neosyncretism. RSUH/RGGU Bulletin: “Literary Teory. Linguistics. Cultural Studies”, Series. 2025;(2):91-101. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.28995/2686-7249-2025-2-91-101

Views: 23


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2073-6355 (Print)