Risk factors and felicity conditions of manipulative strategies in media discourse
https://doi.org/10.28995/2686-7249-2025-3-76-83
Abstract
The paper dwells on the issue of the success degree of manipulative strategies implemented in current mass media formats. The degree of success in manipulation is proposed to be studied in the context of mutual influence of multidirectional and heterogeneous external and internal parameters, both in relation to the interaction of native speakers as members of a specific culture within a particular context, and to the text generated in interaction. It is advisable to describe the relevant parameters either as risk factors or as felicity conditions whose nature and degree of influence on the process and result of interaction does not linearly depend on the designated parameters. The influence cannot always be predicted by analyzing the characteristics of the personal and collective identity for the subject of cognition and communication and/or through taking into account the norms of expectations regarding some type of interaction, as well as by considering the content of stereotypes of consciousness and political, media and public propaganda relevant to the language and culture.
About the Author
L. I. Grishaeva
Voronezh State University
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Liudmila I. Grishaeva - Dr. of Sci. (Philology), professor, Voronezh State University.
1, Universitetskaya Sq., Voronezh, 394006References
1. Antos, G. (2017), “Fake news. Warum wir auf sie reinfallen. Oder: ‘Ich mache euch die Welt, so wie sie mir gefällt’ ”, Sprachdienst, no. 1, S. 1–20.
2. Boldyrev, N.N. (2024), “Fundamentals of the cognitive theory of conflict-free verbal communication”, in Kognitivnye issledovaniya yazyka, vol. 58, iss. 2, part 1, рp. 27–31.
3. Grishaeva, L.I. (2022), Dialogi o mezhkul’turnoi kommunikatsii [Dialogues on intercultural communication], Nauka-Yunipress, Voronezh, Russia.
4. Pugatschjow, V. (2006), “Faktoren und Merkmale der Manipulation”, in Tsvasman, L., Hrsg., Das groβe Lexikon Medien und Kommunikation. Kompendium interdisziplinӓrer Konzepte, Ergon Verlag, Würzburg, Germany, S. 228–232.
5. Tsvasman, L. (2006), “Informationsgesellschaft”, in Tsvasman, L., Hrsg., Das groβe Lexikon Medien und Kommunikation. Kompendium interdisziplinӓrer Konzepte, Ergon Verlag, Würzburg, Germany, S. 134–140.
6. Tsvasman, L. (2006b), “Manipulation”, in Tsvasman, L., Hrsg., Das groβe Lexikon Medien und Kommunikation. Kompendium interdisziplinӓrer Konzepte, Ergon Verlag, Würzburg, Germany, S. 226–228.
7. Zabotkina, V.I. (2023), “Cognitive mechanisms of manipulative influence in media discourse”, Kognitivnye issledovaniya yazyka, vol. 55, iss. 4, рp. 43–47.
8. Zabotkina, V.I. (2024), “Dynamics of cognitive models of manipulation in mediadiscourse”, Kognitivnye issledovaniya yazyka, vol. 58, iss. 2, part 1, рp. 48–51.
Review
For citations:
Grishaeva L.I. Risk factors and felicity conditions of manipulative strategies in media discourse. RSUH/RGGU Bulletin: “Literary Teory. Linguistics. Cultural Studies”, Series. 2025;(3):76-83. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.28995/2686-7249-2025-3-76-83
Views:
16
Email this article 