Conceptual foundations of manipulative influctive speech acts
https://doi.org/10.28995/2686-7249-2025-3-129-136
Abstract
Expressive influctive speech acts of compliment, reprimand and insult are considered in the cognitive and communicative aspects. The article specifies the role of speech acts of compliment, reprimand and insult in the formation of the category of influctivity. The compliments, reprimands and insults as expressive influctive speech acts taken from the British National Corpus served the material for consideration. The analysis is carried out on the material of the English language. Cognitive models of compliment, reprimand and insult expressive influctive speech acts capable of manipulation are presented in the form of a configuration of frames, making it possible to systematically identify the manipulative characteristics of influctive speech acts. Based on the analysis of the mechanism of conceptual projection between the slots of compliment, reprimand, insult and manipulation frames, a conclusion is made about the fundamental role of influctives in manipulation. The idea to consider the frame of credibility and the adjacent frames of comfort, safety, control and trust in order to prevent manipulation is proposed. Dynamic interaction within the configuration of frames “manipulation”, “compliment”, “reprimand”, “insult”, “credibility”, “comfort”, “safety”, “control”, “trust” is proven. A model is presented that describes the correlation of the studied influctive frames with the “manipulation” frame.
About the Author
N. A. KurakinaRussian Federation
Natalia A. Kurakina - Cand. of Sci. (Philology), associate professor, Immanuel Kant Baltic Federal University; Russian State University for the Humanities.
14, A. Nevsky St., Kaliningrad, 236041; 6, Miusskaya Sq., Moscow, 125047
References
1. Grafova, T.A. (1999), “Semantic structure of emotive predicates”, in Telia, V.N., ed., Chelovecheskii faktor v yazyke. Yazykovye mekhanizmy ekspressivnosti [The human factor in language. Language mechanisms of expression], Nauka, Moscow, Russia.
2. Grigor’eva, V.S. (2018), Integrativnost‘ formata rechevogo vzaimodeistviya v dialogicheskom diskurse (na primere bytovykh diskursivnykh zhanrov) [Integrativeness of the format of speech interaction in dialogic discourse (on the example of everyday discursive genres), Abstract of Ph.D. dissertation (Philology), Tambov State University named after G.R. Derzhavin, Tambov, Russia.
3. Kahneman, D. (2016), Dumai medlenno... reshai bystro [Thinking, fast and slow], AST, Moscow, Russia.
4. Kostyushkina, G.M. (2013), “System code of the communicative act”, Gumanitarnyi vector, vol. 36, iss. 4, pp. 70–78, available at: https://zabvektor.com/wp-content/uploads/250319030335-kostjushkina,%20pashhenko.pdf (Accessed 14 Dec. 2024).
5. Susov, I.P. (2009), Lingvisticheskaya pragmatika [Linguistic pragmatics], Nova kniga, Vinnitsa, Ukraine.
6. Searle, J.R. (1965), “What is a speech act?”, in Black, M., ed., Philosophy in America, Allen and Unwin, London, UK.
7. Telia, V.N. (1991), “Expression as a manifestation of the subjective factor in language and its pragmatic orientation”, in Telia, V.N., ed., Chelovecheskii faktor v yazyke. Yazykovye mekhanizmy ekspressivnosti [The human factor in language. Language mechanisms of expression], Nauka, Moscow, Russia.
8. Zabotkina, V.I. (2014), “The impact of cognitive-discourse paradigm on the development of pragmalinguistics”, Kognitivnye issledovaniya yazyka, no. 17, pp. 69–76.
9. Zabotkina, V.I. and Kurakina, N.A. (2023), “Influctive speech acts vs manipulation. Cognitive approach], Kognitivnye issledovaniya yazyka, vol. 56, no. 5, pp. 37–42.
10. Zabotkina, V.I. and Kurakina, N.A. (2024), “Clichéd compliments in manipulative discourse. Cognitive-pragmatic aspect”, RSUH/RGGU Bulletin. “Literary Theory. Linguistics. Cultural Studies” Series, no. 8, pp. 30–41.
Review
For citations:
Kurakina N.A. Conceptual foundations of manipulative influctive speech acts. RSUH/RGGU Bulletin: “Literary Teory. Linguistics. Cultural Studies”, Series. 2025;(3):129-136. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.28995/2686-7249-2025-3-129-136