Preview

RSUH/RGGU Bulletin: “Literary Teory. Linguistics. Cultural Studies”, Series

Advanced search

Poetry readings: an anthropologist’s view

https://doi.org/10.28995/2686-7249-2025-6-67-80

Abstract

This article analyzes the problem of studying a particular type of literary gathering, namely poetry readings, which can be formulated using two questions: 1) why do people gather for poetry readings, 2) what methodology would be appropriate in studying these gatherings? Answers to these questions are given from the standpoint of cultural anthropology, using the methodological tools of sociology and folklore studies. Reading practices vary depending on the goals, structure, and composition of participants. The author examines such reading practices as Tsvetaeva’s bonfires (gatherings of readers) and readings of contemporary poetry (gatherings of authors), which, despite all the differences, possess the spirit of communitas (participatory anti-structurality), allowing communities to “reassemble” and reactualize identity in the rituals of readings. Participants adjust their perception differently depending on the type of gathering. Tsvetaeva’s bonfires require “sincerity” – a demonstration of empathy and special emotional intensity, appealing to the main goal – expanding the network of the community, strengthening the cultural status of the event. Contemporary poetry evenings unfold through carnival irony. They are characterized by anti-behavior, that is, a conscious violation of social norms. Both forms of poetry gatherings transmit the spirit of communitas, according to W. Turner.

About the Authors

E. F. Levochskaya
Russian State University for the Humanities
Russian Federation

Elena F. Levochskaya - Cand. of Sci. (Philology).

6, Miusskaya Sq., Moscow, 125047



S. S. Levochskii
First Moscow State Medical University
Russian Federation

Sergei S. Levochskii - Cand. of Sci. (Philosophy).

bldg. 2, bld. 8, Trubetskaya St., Moscow, 119991



References

1. Adon’eva, S.B. (2022), Dukh naroda i drugie dukhi [The spirit of the people and other spirits], Pal’mira, Saint Petersburg, Russia.

2. Akhiezer, A. et al. (2002), “Space in Russia: Round table”, Otechestvennye zapiski, vol. 7, no. 6, pp. 27–36.

3. Bekker, G. (2018), Autsaidery: issledovaniya po sotsiologii deviantnosti [Outsiders: Studies in the sociology of deviance], Elementarnye formy, Moscow, Russia.

4. Collins, R. (2004), “The program of the theory of ritual interaction”, The Journal of Sociology and Social Antropology, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 27–39.

5. Kukulin, I.V. (2020), “Internet, heterochrony and contemporary Russian poetry”, Russian Literature, vol. 116, pp. 41–66.

6. Leach, E. (2001), Kul’tura i kommunikatsiya: Logika vzaimosvyazi simvolov: K ispol’zovaniyu strukturnogo analiza v sotsial’noi antropologii [Culture and communication. The logic by which symbols are connected. An introduction to the use of structuralist analysis in social anthropology], Vostochnaya literatura, Moscow, Russia.

7. Omel’chenko, E. and Polyakov, S. (2017), “The concept of cultural scene as a theoretical perspective and tool for analyzing urban youth communities”, Sotsiologicheskoe obozrenie, vol. 16, no. 2, pp. 111–132.

8. Stern, F. (1991), “The formal poetry reading”, TDR (The Drama Review), vol. 35, no. 3, pp. 67–84.

9. Turner, V. (1983), Simvol i ritual [Symbol and ritual], Nauka, Moscow, USSR.

10. Turino, T. (2008), Music as social life: The politics of participation, University of Chicago Press, Chicago, USA.

11. Uspenskii, B.A. (1994), “Anti-behavior in the culture of Ancient Rus’ ”, in Uspenskii, B.A., Izbrannye trudy, vol. 1: Semiotika istorii. Semiotika kul’tury [Selected works, vol. 1: Semiotics of history. Semiotics of culture], Gnozis, Moscow, Russia, pp. 320–332.

12. Vezhlyan (Vorob’eva), E.I. (2017), “Contemporary poetry and the ‘problem’ of not reading it: An experience of reconceptualization”, Novoe literaturnoe obozrenie, no. 143, pp. 270–290.

13. Vorob’eva, N.S. (2019), “Communitas as the ‘essential We’: the possibility of dialogical relations in community”, Sotsiologiya vlasti, vol. 31, no. 4, pp. 155–184.

14. Warner, W.L. (2000), Zhivye i mertvye [The living and the dead: A study in the symbolic life of Americans], Universitetskaya kniga, Moscow, Saint Petersburg, Russia.


Review

For citations:


Levochskaya E.F., Levochskii S.S. Poetry readings: an anthropologist’s view. RSUH/RGGU Bulletin: “Literary Teory. Linguistics. Cultural Studies”, Series. 2025;(6):67-80. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.28995/2686-7249-2025-6-67-80

Views: 69


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2073-6355 (Print)