On the issue of the specifics of the expressive means of Orthodox Internet preaching
https://doi.org/10.28995/2686-7249-2025-8-91-108
Abstract
The work is aimed at describing the nomenclature of expressive means of Orthodox Internet preaching and establishing the specifics in their functioning against the background of classical preaching. The material for the study was the transcription of more than 40 Internet sermons posted on Orthodox websites, channels and video blogs of Orthodox clergy, as well as temple sermons from the author’s library. It is shown that the system of expressive speech tools in Orthodox Internet preaching is based on traditional tropes and figures, such as metaphors, epithets, comparisons, antithesis, repetition, syntactic parallelism, and includes specific elocutionary means – irony and contrasting use in a narrow context of semantically unrelated but stylistically opposed lexical units. The features of the use and function of tropes in online preaching are consistently considered. It is shown that when preaching on the Internet, figurative and conceptual metaphors are used, which act in pragmatic, activation, conceptual and modeling functions. It is demonstrated that the specifics of the epithets functioning lies in the use of superlative, metaphorical and conceptual epithets, the main functions of which are pragmatic, activation and aesthetic. It is found out that comparisons are presented in the Orthodox Internet sermon with their diverse structural variants and perform interpretative and text-forming functions. It is revealed that the use of such a trope as irony, which serves to enhance the impact on listeners and activate their attention, is specific for Internet preaching. It is noted that the use of irony leads to the transformation of the stylistic dominant of the sermon.
About the Author
O. A. Prokhvatilova
Russian State University for the Humanities
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Olga A. Prokhvatilova, Dr. of Sci. (Philology), professor
6-6, Miusskaya Sq., Moscow, 125047
References
1. Agafonova, K.A. (2019), “The influence of Orthodox Christianity upon forming the individual in a Russian person”, in Rossiya i mir v novoe i noveishee vremya – iz proshlogo v budushchee: Materialy XXV yubileinoi ezhegodnoi mezhdunarodnoi nauchnoi konferentsii [Russia and the world in modern and contemporary times – from the past to the future. Proceedings of the 25th Anniversary Annual International Scientific Conference, St. Petersburg, March 22, 2019], Saint Petersburg, Russia, pp. 11–14.
2. Amel’chenkov, V.L. (2020), Kommunikativnaya kul’tura russkoi pravoslavnoi tserkvi v informatsionnom prostranstve sovremennoi Rossii [The communicative culture of the Russian Orthodox Church in the information space of modern Russia], Izdatel’stvo RGSU, Moscow, Russia.
3. Baklykova, T.Yu. and Kondrat’ev, A.A. (2024), “Strategies of speech influence in Orthodox religious discourse”, in Petrovskie obrazovatel’nye chteniya, 2024 [Peter the Great Educational Readings], available at: https://petrovskie-chteniya.ru/articles/strategii-rechevogo-vozdeystviya-v-pravoslavnom-religioznom-diskurse/?ysclid=mbxcrqjptb3250669 (Accessed 12 Apr. 2025).
4. Davidson, D. (1990), “What do metaphors mean?”, in Teoriya metafory [Theory of metaphor], Progress, Moscow, USSR, pp. 173–193.
5. Frolova, N.A. (2001) “Figurative-expressive means in the language of Russian sermons of the 18th century (based on F. Prokopovich’s sermon ‘Eulogy to the Russian fleet’)”, in Integratsionnye protsessy v kul’turnoi i obrazovatel’noi sferakh [Integration processes in cultural and educational spheres], MGUKI, Moscow, Russia, pp. 162–164.
6. Kolobaev, P.A. (2019), “On some features and functions of tropes in the patristic heritage of St. Tikhon of Zadonsk and St. Ignatius Brianchaninov”, Nauchnyi dialog, no. 5, pp. 75–89.
7. Lakoff, D. (1990), “Metaphors we live by”, in Teoriya metafory [Theory of metaphor], Progress, Moscow, USSR, pp. 387–415.
8. Lotman, Yu.M. (1998), “Rhetoric”, in Lotman, Yu.M., Ob iskusstve [On art], Iskusstvo – SPb., Saint Petersburg, Russia, pp. 404–422.
9. McCormack, E. (1990), “Cognitive theory of metaphor”, in Teoriya metafory [Theory of metaphor], Progress, Moscow, USSR, pp. 358–386.
10. Mollaeva, A.A. (2004), Leksiko-sintaksicheskoe svoeobrazie pravoslavnoi propovedi XVIII veka [Lexico-syntactic distinctness of the 18th-century Orthodox sermon], Ph.D. Thesis (Philology), Makhachkala, Russia.
11. Naumova, A.V. (2024), “The symbolism of metaphor in Christian discourse and features of its translation (based on the translation of messages by Patriarch Kirill of Moscow and All Russia from Russian into English)”, Dialog kul’tur, vol. 57, no. 2, pp. 203–209.
12. Petrova, O.G. (2011), “Types of irony in literary text. Conceptual and contextual irony”, Izvestiya of Saratov University. Philology. Journalism, vol. 11, no. 3, pp. 25–30.
13. Prilutskii, A.M. (2013), “Metaphorics of religious ritual discourse”, Religiya. Tserkov’. Obshchestvo: Issledovaniya i publikatsii po teologii i religii, no. 2, pp. 21–38.
14. Prokhavatilova, O.A. (1999), Pravoslavnaya propoved’ i molitva kak fenomen sovremennoi zvuchashchei rechi [Orthodox sermon and prayer as a phenomenon of modern spoken speech], Izdatel’stvo Volgogradskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta, Volgograd, Russia.
15. Prokhavatilova, O.A. (2007), “Speech means of the religious style”, in Russkaya slovesnost’ v kontekste sovremennykh integratsionnykh protsessov: Materialy II Mezhdunarodnoi nauchnoi konferentsii, Volgograd, 24–26 aprelya 2007 g. [Russian literature in the context of modern integration processes. Proceedings of the 2nd International Scientific Conference, Volgograd, April 24–26, 2007], Izdatel’stvo Volgogradskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta,Volgograd, Russia, vol. 1, pp. 640–644.
16. Prokhavatilova, O.A. (2011), “Expressive means of the modern Orthodox sermon”, Science Journal of Volgograd State University, Linguistics, vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 7–13.
17. Ricoeur, P. (1990), “The metaphorical process as cognition, imagination, and sensation”, in Teoriya metafory [Theory of metaphor], Progress, Moscow, USSR, pp. 416–434.
18. Shabanova, Z.G. (2006), Lingvisticheskie sredstva vozdeistviya pravoslavnoi propovedi: v istoricheskom aspekte [Linguistic means of influence in Orthodox preaching. A historical perspective], Ph.D. Thesis (Philology), Makhachkala, Russia.
19. Shitikov, M.P. (2011), “Theory and practice of biblical metaphor translation”, Diskussiya, vol. 12, no. 4, pp. 60–62.
20. Shitikov, M.P. (2016), “Realization of the Biblical metaphor ‘I am the way’ in the original and translations”, Pravoslavie. Nauka. Obrazovanie, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 73–78.
21. Shchukina, I.N. and Khazanzhi, E.N. (2014), “Means of influence in Orthodox discourse”, Vestnik Permskogo universiteta. Rossiiskaya i zarubezhnaya filologiya, vol. 25, no. 1, pp. 36–47.
Review
For citations:
Prokhvatilova O.A. On the issue of the specifics of the expressive means of Orthodox Internet preaching. RSUH/RGGU Bulletin: “Literary Teory. Linguistics. Cultural Studies”, Series. 2025;(8):91-108. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.28995/2686-7249-2025-8-91-108
Views:
5
Email this article 