Preview

RSUH/RGGU Bulletin: “Literary Teory. Linguistics. Cultural Studies”, Series

Advanced search

Attributed emotion and the quasi-body. Non-verbal semiotics of objects and spirits in Altai

https://doi.org/10.28995/2686-7249-2026-01-123-135

Abstract

Drawing on the material of contemporary Altai mythology, the article considers the non-verbal semiotics of communication with “non-humans” (spirits, deities). The primary focus is on the phenomenon of attributed emotion – that is, how various emotional states (anger, benevolence, resentment, etc.) are ascribed to spirits, objects, and natural phenomena, and are subsequently recognized and interpreted as an emotional response through non-verbal channels of communication. The author introduces and elaborates the concepts of the “quasibody” and “quasi-gesture,” which are crucial for understanding the processual nature of attributed emotion. The article describes how spirits and other numinous agents express their reactions not through their own (absent or invisible) bodies, but through elements of the surrounding world. Such “quasi-bodies” can include ritual objects (e. g., a shaman’s drum, the Altai musical instrument topshuur, a ritual chalice), natural elements (fire, water, air), as well as animals and even people. Their specific alterations (the deformation of a ritual object, an increase in a water current’s flow, particular patterns in a flame’s burning, agitation in the air, or the appearance of certain animals) are read as “quasi-gestures” carrying an emotional response. It is emphasized that such practices of recognizing attributed and distributed emotions are based on the mythologization of everyday objects, whereby virtually any thing or phenomenon can become a situational embodiment (a “quasi-body”) of a numinous agent and a vehicle for its emotional message.

About the Author

D. Yu. Doronin
Russian State University for the Humanities
Russian Federation

Dmitrii Yu. Doronin, Cand. of Sci. (History) 

6-6, Miusskaya Sq., Moscow, 125047 



References

1. Bat’yanova, E.P. (2005), “The Teleut version of Burkhanism”, Etnograficheskoe obozrenie, no. 4, pp. 70–85.

2. Doronin, D.Yu. (2019), “ ‘Look at me with a soft glance’. Eyes in Altai current mythology”, in Antonov, D.I., comp., Sila vzglyada: glaza v mifologii i ikonografii [The power of the gaze. Eyes in mythology and iconography], RGGU, Moscow, Russia, pp. 217–281. (Traditsiya – tekst – fol’klor: tipologiya i semiotika)

3. Doronin, D.Yu. (2017), “Power and threat. Strategies of protection from sacred images in Altai”, in Antonov, D.I., ed., Izobrazhenie i kul’t: sakral’nye obrazy v khristianskikh traditsiyakh: Materialy nauchnoi konferentsii (Moskva, RANKhiGS, 16–17 iyunya 2017 g.) [Image and cult. Sacred images in Christian traditions. Proceedings of the Scientific Conference (Moscow, RANEPA, June 16–17, 2017), Izdatel’skii dom «Delo», Moscow, Russia, pp. 38–47.

4. Doronin, D.Yu. (2016), “On the crest of the mountain. Structure and markers of communication in Altaic visionary practices”, RSUH/RGGU Bulletin. “History. Philology. Cultural Studies. Oriental Studies” Series, no. 12, pp. 115–134.

5. Doronin, D.Yu. (2015), “Fifty shades of Toyota. The life of a car in an Altai city”, Anthropology & Archeology of Eurasia, vol. 54, no. 1, pp. 36–52.

6. Doronin, D.Yu. (2013), “Between the bear and the angel. The typology of mountain-master images by Altai folks”, in Antonov, D.I. and Khristoforova, O.B., eds., In Umbra: Demonologiya kak semioticheskaya sistema: Al’manakh [In Umbra: Demonology as a Semiotic System. Almanac], iss. 2, Indrik, Moscow, Russia, pp. 245–296.

7. Dyakonova, V.P. (1981), “Objects related to the healing function of shamans in Tuva and Altai”, in Putilov, B.N., ed., Material’naya kul’tura i mifologiya: Sbornik muzeya antropologii i etnografii [Material culture and mythology. Collection of the Museum of Anthropology and Ethnography], vol. 37, Nauka, Leningrad, USSR, pp. 138–152.

8. Khristoforova, O.B. (1998), Logika tolkovanii: Fol’klor i modelirovanie povedeniya v arkhaicheskikh kul’turakh [The logic of interpretations. Folklore and behavior modeling in archaic cultures], RGGU, Moscow, Russia.

9. Novik, E.S. (1984), Obryad i fol’klor v sibirskom shamanizme: Opyt sopostavleniya struktur [Ritual and folklore in Siberian shamanism. An experience of structural comparison], Nauka, Moscow, USSR.

10. Yadanova, K.V. (2006), Neskazochnaya proza telengitov [Non-fairytale prose of the Telengits], Rezhans, Moscow, Russia.


Review

For citations:


Doronin D.Yu. Attributed emotion and the quasi-body. Non-verbal semiotics of objects and spirits in Altai. RSUH/RGGU Bulletin: “Literary Teory. Linguistics. Cultural Studies”, Series. 2026;1(1):123-135. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.28995/2686-7249-2026-01-123-135

Views: 74

JATS XML


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2073-6355 (Print)