.png)
.png)
Email this article 
A historian and a ruler. Reality’s interpretation
https://doi.org/10.28995/2686-7249-2017-10-1-40-46
Abstract
References
1. Teitler H.C. Ammianus and Constantius. Image and Reality // Cognitio Gestorum: The Historiographic Art of Ammianus Marcellinus / J. den Boeft, D. Den Hengst, H.C. Teitler (eds.). Amsterdam: Royal Netherlands Academy of Arts and Sciences, 1992. P. 117.
2. Pauw D.A. Ammianus Marcellinus and Ancient Historiography, Biography and Character Portrayal // Acta Classica. 1979. Vol. 22. P. 121-125.
3. Tränkle H. Ammianus Marcellinus als römischer Geschichtsschreiber // Antike und Abendland. 1962. Bd. 22. S. 22-23.
4. Demandt A. Zeitkritik und Geschichtsbild im Werk Ammians. Bonn: Rudolf Habelt Verlag, 1965. S. 99.
5. Pauw D.A. Methods of Character Portrayal in the “Res Gestae” of Ammianus Marcellinus // Acta Classica. 1977. Vol. 20. P. 182.
6. Rosen K. Studien zur Darstellungskunst und Glaubwürdigkeit des Ammianus Marcellinus. Heidelberg: Inaugural-Dissertation, 1968. S. 5.
7. Kelly G. Constantius II, Julian, and the Example of Marcus Aurelius (Ammianus Marcellinus XXI, 16, 11-12) // Latomus. 2005. T. 64. F. 2. P. 410.
8. Blockley R.C. Constantius Gallus and Jullian as Caesars of Constantius II // Latomus. 1972. T. 31. Fasc. 2. P. 438.
9. Gimazane J. Ėtude sur le quatrieme siècle. Ammien Marcellin, sa vie et son oeuvre. Toulouse, 1889. P. 320.
10. Dautremer L. Ammien Marcellin. L’étude d’histoire littéraire. Lille: Le Bigot Frères dans Travaux et Mémoires de l’Université de Lille, 1899. P. 115.
11. Thompson E.A. The Historical Work of Ammianus Marcellinus. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1947. P. 125.
12. Laistner M.L. The Greater Roman Historians. Los Angeles: University of California Press, 1947. P. 158-161.
13. Conduché D. Ammien Marcellin et la mort de Julien // Latomus. 1965. T. 24. Fasc. 2. P. 379.
14. Удальцова З.В. Мировоззрение Аммиана Марцеллина // Византийский временник. 1968. Т. 28. С. 39.
15. Syme R. Ammianus and the Historia Augusta. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1968. P. 94-96.
16. Momigliano A. The Lonely Historian Ammianus Marcellinus // Annali della Scuola Normale Superiore di Pisa, Classe di Lettere e Filosofia. Vol. 4. № 4. Pisa, 1974. P. 1405.
17. Jacob-Karau L.-U. Warum Ammian-Forschung heute? // Klio. 1976. Vol. 58. S. 95-96.
18. Sabbah G. La méthode d’Ammien Marcellin: Recherches sur la construction du discours historique dans les Res Gestae. Paris: Les Belles Lettres, 1978. P. 255; 403.
19. Matthews J.F. Ammianus Marcellinus // Sabbah G. Political Life and Culture in Late Roman Society. London: Variorum Reprints, 1985. P. 1118.
20. Athanassiadi-Fowden P. Julian and Hellenism: an Intellectual Biography. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1981. P. 78.
21. Kelly G. Ammianus Marcellinus the Allusive Historian. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2008. P. 255.
22. Dmitriev S. “Good Emperors” and Emperors of the Third Century // Hermes. 2004. Bd. 132. H. 2. P. 214.
23. Matthews J.F. The Roman Empire of Ammianus. London: Duckworth, 1989. P. 34.
24. Tougher S. Ammianus Marcellinus on the Empress Eusebia: a Split Personality? // Greece and Rome. 2000. Vol. 47. № 1. P. 98, 100.
25. Thompson E.A. The Historical Method of Ammianus Marcellinus // Hermathena. 1942. № 59. P. 47.
26. Morley N. Ammianus Marcellinus and the Representation of Historical Reality by T.D. Barnes // The Classical Review. 2000. New Series. Vol. 50. № 1. P. 86.
27. Mellor R. Ammianus Marcellinus and the Representation of Historical Reality by Timothy D. Barnes // The Classical World. 2000. Vol. 93. № 5. P. 551.
28. Henck N. Constantius ὁ Φιλοκτίστης // Dumbarton Oaks Papers. 2001. Vol. 55. P. 280-302.
Supplementary files
For citation: Ermolova I. A historian and a ruler. Reality’s interpretation. RSUH/RGGU Bulletin: “Literary Teory. Linguistics. Cultural Studies”, Series. 2017;(10-1):40-46. https://doi.org/10.28995/2686-7249-2017-10-1-40-46
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
