The narrator and reader position in the story “Autobiography of the Corpse” by Sigizmund Krzhizhanovsky
https://doi.org/10.28995/2073-6355-2018-2-221-230
Abstract
The story “Autobiography of the Corpse” is one of the most significant works by Sigismund Krzyzanowski. The article examines main features of an anthropological crisis at the event, narrative and receptive levels of the artistic structure. Infection of the recipient notes corpse way of seeing the introduction of it in the area of transgressive perception and recall of history is one of the main tasks of hero-narrator. Instilling in someone else’s visual-mental space, the unnamed notes author, provides another subject with his own eyes, with the sight of corpse. The situation of mental experiment of the hero upon himself and others, test the existential position of Stamm as that of the addressee of the notes are correlated with the mechanisms of “killing” the consciousness of the reader throughout the novel.
Keywords
повесть,
трансгрессия,
нарратор,
рассказчик,
герой,
читатель,
рецепция,
самоопределение,
антропологический кризис,
story,
transgression,
narrator,
narrator,
hero,
reader,
reception,
self-determination,
anthropological crisis
About the Author
Sergey Lavlinsky
Russian State University for the Humanities
Russian Federation
References
1. Тамарченко Н.Д. Русская повесть Серебряного века: Проблемы поэтики сюжета и жанра. М.: Intrada, 2007.
2. Кржижановский С. Клуб убийц букв // Кржижановский С. Собр. соч. В 6 т. Т. 2. СПб.: Симпозиум, 2001.
3. Ямпольский М. О близком. М.: НЛО, 2001.
4. Топоров В.Н. «Минус»-пространство Сигизмунда Кржижановского // Топоров В.Н. Миф. Ритуал. Символ. Образ: Исследования в области мифопоэтического: Избранное. М.: Прогресс, 1995. С. 545.
5. Ямпольский М. Смерть в кино // Ямпольский М. Язык - тело - случай: Кинематограф и поиски смысла. М.: НЛО, 2004. С. 184.
For citations:
Lavlinsky S.
The narrator and reader position in the story “Autobiography of the Corpse” by Sigizmund Krzhizhanovsky. RSUH/RGGU Bulletin: “Literary Teory. Linguistics. Cultural Studies”, Series. 2018;(2-2):221-230.
https://doi.org/10.28995/2073-6355-2018-2-221-230
Views:
259