Against ornament: O.M. Freidenberg’s concept of metaphor in Ancient and Modern contexts


https://doi.org/10.28995/2073-6355-2018-3-7-15

Full Text:




Abstract

Freidenberg’s work might still be of relevance, not just in relation to more recent theories of metaphor, but also as a heuristic device in the study of archaic Greek poetry. Almost half of a century earlier than Lakoff and his circle Freidenberg’s researches of metaphor anticipated the emergency of the common interest in cognitive function of metaphor. Unlike contemporary cognitivists Freidenberg treated metaphor (as well as any kind of allegory) diachronicaly. She asserted that metaphoric images originate from their mythic predecessors while their rhetorical function in the archaic literature appears to be projections of the earlier cognitive one. Relics of primitive thought Freidenberg treated as “cultural survivals” of a collective belief.

About the Author

Richard Martin
Stanford University (USA)
Russian Federation


References

1. Martin R.P. Against Ornament: O.M. Freidenberg’s Concept of Metaphor in Ancient and Modern Contexts. Chapter 11 // Persistent Forms: Explorations in Historical Poetics (Verbal Arts) / I. Kliger, B. Maslov (eds.). New York: Fordham University Press, 2015 (Series “Verbal Art: Studies in Poetics”). P. 274-313.

2. Ricoeur P. The Rule of Metaphor: Multi-Disciplinary Studies in the Creation of Meaning in Language / R. Czerny, K. McLaughlin, J. Costello (transl.). Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 1977. P. 46.

3. Фрейденберг О.М. Происхождение эпического сравнения (на материале Илиады) // Труды юбилейной науч. сессии ЛГУ. Секция филол. наук. Л., 1946. С. 101-113.

4. Freidenberg O.M. Pre-Homeric Semantics / N. Perlina (ed.) // Soviet Studies in Literature. Special Issue on Olga Freidenberg. 1991. Vol. 27 (3). P. 38-49 (= Из догомеровской семантики: 1. ‘Друг’ - ‘Другой’ - ‘Дружина’ // Академия наук СССР академику Н.Я. Марру. М.; Л., 1935. № XLV. С. 381-392).

5. turner M. Death is the Mother of Beauty: Mind, Metaphor, Criticism. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1987.

6. Maslov B. From (Theogonic) Mythos to (Poetic) Logos: Reading Pindar’s Genealogical Metaphors after Freidenberg // Journal of Ancient Near Eastern Religions. 2012. Vol. 12. P. 49-77.

7. Todorov T. Genres in Discourse / C. Porter (ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1990.

8. Ben-Amos D. Analytical Categories and Ethnic Genres // Genre. 1969. Vol. 2. P. 275-301.

9. Bauman R. Story, Performance, and Event: Contextual Studies of oral Narrative. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1986.

10. Nagy G. The Best of the Achaeans Concepts of the Hero in Archaic Greek Poetry Revised. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1979.

11. Фрейденберг О.М. Миф и литература древности. М., 1998. С. 261.


Supplementary files

For citation: Martin R. Against ornament: O.M. Freidenberg’s concept of metaphor in Ancient and Modern contexts. RSUH/RGGU Bulletin: “Literary Teory. Linguistics. Cultural Studies”, Series. 2018;(3-1):7-15. https://doi.org/10.28995/2073-6355-2018-3-7-15

Views: 321

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2073-6355 (Print)