Preview

RSUH/RGGU Bulletin: “Literary Teory. Linguistics. Cultural Studies”, Series

Advanced search

“Doubles” and opposites: from archaics to dialectics (O.M. Freidenberg and Plato)

https://doi.org/10.28995/2073-6355-2018-3-56-70

Abstract

The article juxtaposes the views of O.M. Freidenberg on the archaic thought, with its “duality”, and the concept of opposites and “reflections” in Plato. Freidenberg believes that this unification of opposites is an unconscious relic of the archaics in Plato. I examine Plato’s views in the context of his disputes with the Sophists and Eleats, trying to show that he actually comes to the idea of interacting and coexistent opposites that are also “images” of each other. This idea appears to be similar to archaic ideas about opposing doubles, but it is based on the reflection of thought and speech and on the concept of the “other”, representing a totally new region for the Greeks, the dialectics.

About the Author

Irina Protopopova
Russian State University for the Humanities
Russian Federation


References

1. Пресс Дж. Постановка вопроса в платоноведении // Платоновский сборник. В 2 т. М.; СПб.: РГГУ-РХГА, 2013. Т. 1. С. 8-47.

2. Gagarin M. «Socrates’ Hybris and Alcibiades’ Failure» // Phoenix. 1977. № 31. Р. 22-37.

3. Протопопова И.А. Ὕβρις как инверсия «объекта» и «метода» в «Пире» Платона // Σχολῇ. Философское антиковедение и классическая традиция. 2015. Т. 10. Вып. 2. С. 373-379.

4. Фрейденберг О.М. Миф и литература древности. 2-е изд., испр. и доп. М.: Восточная литература РАН, 1998. С. 297.

5. Braginskaja N. Binômes, opposition, répétition, contraste. Les racines mythologiques des catégories esthétiques d’ol′ga Frejdenberg // Revue des études slaves. Paris, 2016. LXXXVII/1. Р. 35-51.

6. Rappe S. ‘Father of the dogs? Cynic elements in Plato’s Euthydemus’ // Classical Philology. 2000. Vol. 95. № 3. Р. 282-303.

7. Бахтин М.М. К методологии гуманитарных наук // Эстетика словесного творчества / Бахтин М.М. 2-е изд. М.: Искусство, 1986. С. 382-383.


Review

For citations:


Protopopova I. “Doubles” and opposites: from archaics to dialectics (O.M. Freidenberg and Plato). RSUH/RGGU Bulletin: “Literary Teory. Linguistics. Cultural Studies”, Series. 2018;(3-1):56-70. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.28995/2073-6355-2018-3-56-70

Views: 340


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2073-6355 (Print)