The Two “Bodies” of the Icon: Communication with the Sacred Image as Appropriation of its Power


https://doi.org/10.28995/2073-6355-2018-7-9-34

Full Text:




Abstract

The paper focuses on an appropriation of power/grace emanating from icons in the beliefs that are widespread mainly in East-Christian traditions.Appropriation is a specific strategy of communication with the sacred images. In a wider context, it unites icons, relics and other sacred Christian objects with magical tools used (also in Christian communities) as the permanent source of power. As the most important sacred objects in Russian orthodoxy, icons have always been included in a variety of actions that directed the holy image’s power/grace at the target object or person or object so that his/hers/its state or condition is changed in a desired way. This is a manipulative strategy - the physical action is prior to addressing/praying to God or a saint. The range of such actions is extensive. First of all, it includes the variety of rites linked to healing, welfare-producing or protective magic that works in different spaces: private (the body, the bed or the house), public (the field, the village or the city) and the other’s / hostile ones (the foes, the alienate/heterodox territories). Moreover it also includes a set of practices associated with the physical transfer of grace to new objects and with the creation of various brandea, contact relics, which are secondary to the “mother” holy thing. All these practices presuppose the icon (or another sacred object) to have not only the physical and visible “body” but also the invisible one that has a spatial extent and somehow limited form lines. The author analyzes main types of actions that are typical of the appropriation strategy on the historical and partly modern Russian material.

About the Author

Dmitriy I. Antonov
Russian State University for the Humanities; School for Advanced Studies in Humanities Of Russian Academy of National Economy and Public Administration
Russian Federation
PhD in History, associate professor, Russian State University for the Humanities, Moscow, Russia; bld. 6, Miusskaya sq., Moscow,
125993, Russia; School of Advanced Studies in the Humanities, RANEPA,
Moscow, Russia; bld. 82, Vernadskogo av., Moscow, 119606


References

1. Belting H. Likeness and Presence: A History of the Image before the Era of Art. Moscow: Progress-Traditsiya Publ.; 2002. 748 p. (In Russ.)

2. Antonov DI. Two “Bodies” of the Icon: Appropriation of Power of the Sacred Image. V: Antonov DI., ed., comp. Depiction and Cult: Sacred Images in Christian Traditions. Materialy nauchnoi konferentsii. Moscow: Delo Publ.; 2017. р. 5-13. (In Russ.)

3. Makhanko MA. Venerating and Collecting old Icons in Muscovite Rus’ of the 16th century Moscow: BuksMart Publ.; 2015. 432 p. (In Russ.)

4. Shalina IA. Relics in Eastern-Christian Iconography. Moscow: Indrik Publ.; 2005. 536 p. (In Russ.)

5. Recht R. Believing and Seeing: The Art of Cathedrals of 12th – 15th. Moscow: Vysshaya shkola ekonomiki Publ.; 2014. 352 p. (In Russ.)

6. Fullerton MD. on Miracle-Making Images in Greco-Roman Culture. V: Lidov AM., comp. The Miracle-Making Icon in Byzantine Empire and Medieval Rus’. Moscow: Martis Publ.; 1996. р. 11-18. (In Russ.)

7. Kriukova SS. The orthodox Sacred objects, Sainthood and Sacrilege in the Peasant Justice (second half of the 19th). V: Kirichenko oV., ed., comp. Shrines and Holiness in the Every-Day Life of Russian Folk: An Ethnographic Research. Moscow: Nauka Publ.; 2010. р. 207-40. (In Russ.)

8. Gromyko MM. The orthodox Ceremonies and Practices in Russian Peasant’s Home. V: Kirichenko oV., Poplavskaya KhV., eds. Orthodox faith and traditions of piety among Russians in the 18th – 19th centuries: An Ethnographic Research and Materials. Moscow: Nauka Publ.; 2002. 469 p. (In Russ.)

9. Maguire H. The Icons of Their Bodies: Saints and Their Images in Byzantium. Princeton: Princeton Univ. Press, 2000. 240 p.

10. Bartholeyns G., Dittmar P.-o., Jolivet V. “Des raisons de détruire une image”. V: Images Revues. 2006;2:2-25.

11. Bartholeyns G., Dittmar P-o., Jolivet V. Image et transgression au Moyen Âge. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France (Lignes d’Art), 2008. 196 p.

12. Korogodina MV. Confession in Russia in the 14th – 19th centuries: Research and Texts. Sankt-Peterburg: Dmitrii Bulanin Publ.; 2006. 584 p. (In Russ.)

13. Ammendments to the Historical Acts, Published by the Archeographical Comission, Vol. 1. Sankt-Peterburg: Tipografiya Eduarda Pratsa Publ.; 1846. (Russkaya istoricheskaya biblioteka, vol. 36). (In Russ.)

14. Texts on old Russian Сanonical Law. Part 2. Issue 1. Petrograd, 1920.

15. Siegmund Freiherr von Herberstein. Rerum Moscoviticarum Commentarii. Moscow: MGU Publ.; 1988. 430 p. (In Russ.)

16. Ivanov SA. “The Hell-Painted Icons” in the Context of Late Medieval Russian Culture. V: Lidov AM., comp. Miracle-Making Icon in Byzantine Empire and Medieval Rus’. Moscow: Martis Publ.; 1996. р. 385-91. (In Russ.)

17. Smilianskaya E.B., ed. on the own Land, the own Faith, the own and the Experiences in Russia of the 20th - 21st centuries. Moscow: Indrik Publ.; 2012. 472 p. (In Russ.)

18. The Slavonic Antiquities: The Ethno-linguistic Dictionary. Moscow: Mezhdunarodnye otnosheniya Publ.; 1995-2012. 5 vol. (In Russ.)

19. Tsehanskaya K.V. Venerating orthodox Sacral objects in Russia. Moscow: Palomnik Publ.; 2013. 400 p. (In Russ.)

20. Antonov DI. The Icon-Painter and the Viewer: Ecclesiastical Icon as the Text and the Image-object. V: Togoeva oI., Danilevskii IN., eds. Casus: The Individual and the Unique in History, 2017. Issue 12. Moscow: Indrik Publ.; 2017. р. 242-56. (In Russ.)

21. Dmitriev LA. The Tale of the Battle of the Novgorodians and Suzdalians people. V: The Dictionary of the Scribes and the Booklore of Medieval Rus’. Issue 2: The second half of the 14th – 16th centuries. Part 2: L–Ya. Leningrad: Nauka, Leningradskoe otdelenie Publ.; 1989. р. 347-51. (In Russ.)

22. Kremleva IA. The Role of the Vow in the Worldview and Everyday Life of Russian Folk. V: Kirichenko oV., ed., comp. Shrines and Holiness in the Every-Day Life of Russian Folk: An Ethnographic Research. Moscow: Nauka Publ.; 2010. р. 214-84. (In Russ.)

23. Ulfeld J. Hodoeporicon Ruthenicum (The Voyage to Russia). Moscow: Yazyki slavyanskoi kul’tury Publ.; 2002. 616 p. (In Russ.)

24. Olearius A. Travels of the Ambassadors sent by Frederic, Duke of Holstein, to the Great Duke of Muscovy and the King of Persia. Smolensk: Rusich Publ.; 2003. 480 p. (In Russ.)

25. Shliakhtina NV. The Apotropaic Functions of the Sacred objects in a House. V: Kirichenko oV., ed., comp. Shrines and Holiness in the Every-Day Life of Russian Folk: An Ethnographic Research. Moscow: Nauka Publ.; 2010. p. 373-418. (In Russ.)


Supplementary files

For citation: Antonov D.I. The Two “Bodies” of the Icon: Communication with the Sacred Image as Appropriation of its Power. RSUH/RGGU Bulletin: “Literary Teory. Linguistics. Cultural Studies”, Series. 2018;(7):9-34. https://doi.org/10.28995/2073-6355-2018-7-9-34

Views: 242

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2073-6355 (Print)