Preview

RSUH/RGGU Bulletin: “Literary Teory. Linguistics. Cultural Studies”, Series

Advanced search

Family and clan as cultural phenomena in Classical Antiquity: Ancient Greek ΟΙΚΟΣ and ΓΕΝΟΣ as compared with Roman FAMILIAand GENS

https://doi.org/10.28995/2073-6355-2018-7-126-142

Abstract

The article contains a comparative analysis of some elements of Ancient Greek and Roman familial and generical structures. At the first view,the two systems are extremely similar. The lowest, primary level is in both cases is the family (Greek οἶκος, Roman familia). At the following level there is a thing often translated as “clan” (Greek γένος, Roman gens). Further on, we again there are units those seem to correlate: Greek phratry (φρατρία) and Roman curia. Still further on, there is a large unit usually understood as the tribe: Greek φυλή and Roman tribus. The article, however, notes that the analogy is false. If Ancient Greek family (οἶκος) has features of principal similarity with the Roman one (familia), yet already at the next taxonomic level, Greek γένος demonstrates very serious differences from Roman gens , and the differences only grow at higher levels (Greek φρατρία and Roman curia , Greek φυλή and Roman tribus). The article also touches the history of the issue and specially accentuates the impact brought to the study of Ancient Greek gentile structures by French scholars F. Bourriot and D. Roussel; they, as a matter of fact, offered and proved a principally new understanding of the Hellenic γένος.

About the Author

Igor E. Surikov
Institute of World History, Russian Academy of Sciences; Russian State University for the Humanities
Russian Federation

dr. in History; professor;

bld. 32a, Leninskii av., Moscow, 119991;

bld. 6, Miusskaya Sq., Moscow, 125993



References

1. Surikov IE. From the history of Late Archaic and Early Classical Greek aristocracy. The Alcmaeonid family in Athens’ political life, 7th – 5th centuries B.C. Moscow: Institut vseobshchei istorii RAN Publ.; 2000. 284 p. (In Russ.)

2. Bourriot F. Recherches sur la nature du genos: Étude d’histoire sociale athénienne. Periodes archaïque et classique. Lille; Paris: Univ. de Lille Publ.; 1976. XXI, 1421 p.

3. Roussel D. Trubu et cité. Études sur les groupes sociaux dans les cités grecques aux époques archaïque et classique. Paris: Maspero Publ.; 1976. 347 p.

4. Surikov IE. ΔΗΜΟΤΕΥΤΑΙ: Political elite of Attic demes in Early Classical period (to the statement of an issue). Journal of Ancient History. 2005;1:15-33. (In Russ.)

5. Toepffer J. Attische Genealogie. Berlin: Wedmann Publ.; 1889. VI, 338 S.

6. Forrest WG. The Emergence of Greek Democracy: The Character of Greek Politics, 800-400 B.C. London: Weidenfeld and Nicolson Publ.; 1966. 240 p.

7. Lambert SD. The Phratries of Attica. Ann Arbor: The Univ. of Michigan Press, 1998. XI, 424 p.

8. Semenov YuI. Economic ethnology. Primitive and early pre-class society. Moscow: Institut etnologii i antropologii RAN Publ.; 1993. Vol. 1-3. (In Russ.)

9. Oliver JH. Demokratia, the Gods, and the Free World. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins Univ. Press, 1960. X, 192 p.

10. Wade-Gery HT. Essays in Greek History. oxford: Blackwell Publ.; 1958. 280 p.

11. Benveniste É. The vocabulary of Indo-European institutions. Moscow: Progress Publ.; 1995. 456 p. (In Russ.)

12. Littman RJ. Kinship and Politics in Athens 600-400 B.C. New York: Lang Publ.; 1990. XII, 274 p.

13. Connor WR. The New Politicians of Fifth-Century Athens. Princeton: Univ. Press, 1971. 214 p.

14. Wilbrandt M. Die politische und sociale Bedeutung der attischen Geschlechter vor Solon. Philologus. 1898;7:133-228.

15. Schjøtt Po. Die athenische Aristokratie. Christiania: Videnskab-Selskab Publ.; 1906. 29 S.

16. Kirchner J. Prosopographia Attica. Berlin: Reimerus Publ.; 1901-1903. Bd. 1-2.

17. Fraser PM., Matthews E., ed. A Lexicon of Greek Personal Names. Vol. 2: osborne MJ., Byrne SG., ed. Attica. oxford: Clarendon Press, 1994. 510 p.

18. Davies JK. Athenian Propertied Families, 600-300 B.C. oxford: Clarendon Press, 1971. XXXII, 653 p.

19. Stahl M. Aristokraten und Tyrannen im archaischen Athen: Untersuchungen zur Überlieferung, zur Sozialstruktur und zur Entstehung des Staates. Stuttgart: Steiner Publ.; 1987. XIII, 287 S.

20. Stein-Hölkeskamp E. Adelskultur und Polisgesellschaft. Studien zum griechischen Adel in archaischer und klassischer Zeit. Stuttgart: Steiner Publ.; 1989. 272 S.

21. Blavatskaya TV. Essays in the history of the statehood in Hellas (12th - 7th centuries B.C.). Sankt-Peterburg: Aleteiya Publ.; 2003. 410 p. (In Russ.)

22. Hemmerdinger B. Le régime des eupatrides dans Athènes (621-594). Quaderni di storia. 1984;19:165-70.

23. Goušchin V. Pisistratus’ Leadership in A.P. 13.4 and the Establishment of the Tyranny of 561/560 B.C. Classical Quarterly. 1999;1:14-23.


Review

For citations:


Surikov I.E. Family and clan as cultural phenomena in Classical Antiquity: Ancient Greek ΟΙΚΟΣ and ΓΕΝΟΣ as compared with Roman FAMILIAand GENS. RSUH/RGGU Bulletin: “Literary Teory. Linguistics. Cultural Studies”, Series. 2018;(7):126-140. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.28995/2073-6355-2018-7-126-142

Views: 448


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2073-6355 (Print)