“Two-Voiced Word” And Representation of "Collective Trauma" In The Films "Duba-Duba" And "outskirts", Shot By Screenplays of Peter Lutsik And Aleksei Samoryadov

In the article films “Dyuba-Dyuba” and “Outskirts”, shot on the screenplays of Peter Lutsik and Alexei Samoryadov, are analyzed. It is established that the structure of each of these films corresponds to a form called “two-voiced word”. V.S. Bibler defines this form as the coexistence of various “syntactic structures in one artistic utterance”. Different “voices” in the films “Dyuba-Dyuba” and “Outskirts” do not muffle each other and are perceived as self-sufficient and equal literary-cinematic styles, genres and pictorial canons. Films “Dyuba-Dyuba” and “Outskirts” outwardly resemble the movie of 1990’s that uniquely belongs to prosperous in those years culture of “styob”. However, according to the author of the article, analyzed films are alien to typical for the “styob” vision of a certain “archaic” “object of distancing” from the point of view of allegedly “more progressive truth”. A. Hvan and P. Lutsik do not parody this or that “object of distancing”, but they are building certain relationships between different codes of culture, shown in considered films. Using the concept of M.M. Bachtin those relationships can be called “dialogical”. “Dialogical” form of a “two-voiced word” is interpreted in the article as a structure-forming base for “collective trauma” representation language. Such interpretation does not coincide with the assertion of the possibility for representing “collective trauma” only as implementation of pre-semiotic, “silent”impact on viewers. It means that despite an obvious similarity of analyzed films with postmodern pastiche they cannot be inscribed in a circle of those works that are directly related to the poststructuralist and postmodern concepts of“death of the author”, “emptiness” and “absence”.

Peter Lutsik, Aleksei Samoryadov, cultural code, quotation, structure of the work, syntactics, semantics, two-voiced word

1. Plakhov A. Pyotr Lutsik died. Kommersant. Moscow. 2000. oct. 31. (In Russ.)

2. Lutsic P., Samoryadov A. Collected works. orenburg: orenburgskaya kniga Publ.; 2016. 648 p. (In Russ.)

3. Auerbach E. Mimesis. Representation of reality in West-Europian literature. Vol. 2. Blagoveshchensk: Blagoveshchenskii gumanitarnyi kolledzh im. I.A. Boduena de Kurtene Publ.; 1999. 240 p. (In Russ.)

4. Bachtin MM. Epos and novel. Sankt-Peterburg: Azbuka Publ.; 2000, 304 p. (In Russ.)

5. We came to the cinema with greetings (The Pentalogy of film critics Stishova Elena and Matizen Victor, filmmaker Hvan Alexander, screenwriters Lutsic Peter and Samoryadov Alex in the Sochi hotel “Zhemchuzhina” (“Pearl”). Iskusstvo kino. 1993;9:120-1. (In Russ.)

6. Dubin BV. Word – writing – literaturу: Essays on the sociology of modern culture. Moscow: Novoe literaturnoe obozrenie Publ.; 2001, 416 p. (In Russ.)

7. Dobrotvorski S. We are all captains, everyone is famous. Seans. 1992;7:120-21. (In Russ.)

8. Shapinskaya EN. Images of the past in the culture of postmodernism. Representation or pastiche? Kul’tura i iskusstvo. 2012;3:58-63. (In Russ.)

9. Mantsov I. Geopolitical comedy. Iskusstvo kino. 1998;12:27-32. (In Russ.)

10. Reyfman BV. obvios and hidden (about some typical for Soviet cinema realism of the Stalin era properties of the structure of the the film «Youth of Maxim»). Voprosy Culturologii. 2009;8: 81-5. (In Russ.)

11. Afanacyev AN. Preface: Folk Russian fairy tales by Afanacev AN. Vol. 1. [Internet]. [data obrashcheniya: 25.12.2014]. URL: http://starina-rus.ru/afanasiev-skazka1/predislovie1873.php (In Russ.)

12. Sontag S. Against interpretation and other essays. Moscow: Ad Marginem Press. 2014, 352 p. (In Russ.)

13. Bachtin MM. Works of the 1920s. Kiev: Next Publ.; 1994. 384 p. (In Russ.)

14. Bachtin MM. Issues of Dostoevsky’s works. Kyiv: Next Publ.; 511 p. (In Russ.)

15. Bachtin MM. Aesthetics of verbal works. Moscow: Iskusstvo Publ.; 1979. 424 p. (In Russ.)

16. Gogotishvili LA. The author and his role inversions (to the comparison of VS Bibler and M.M. Bakhtin’s approaches). Bibler and M.M. Bakhtin). V: Vladimir Solomonovich Bibler. Moscow: RoSSPEN Publ.; 2009. p. 181-241. (In Russ.)

17. Bibler VS. M.M. Bakhtin, or the Poetics of Culture [Internet]. [data obrashcheniya: 2 Apr. 2009]. URL: http://biblio.giuvus.ru/biblio/archive/bibler_mihail/00.aspx (In Russ.)

18. Habermas J. The disenchantment of religious-metaphysical worldviews and the emergence of modern structures of consciousness. Russian Sociological Review. 2010;1:27-52. (In Russ.)

19. Ankersmith FR. An exalted historical experience. Moscow: Evropa Publ.; 2007. 612 p. (In Russ.)

20. Karut K. Trauma, time and history. V: Ushakin S., Trubina E., comp. Trauma:Items: Collected papers. Moscow: Novoe literaturnoe obozrenie Publ.; 2009. р. 561-79. (In Russ.)

21. Krauss R. The Photographic. An experience of the theory of discrepancies. Moscow: Ad Marginem Press, 2014. 304 p. (In Russ.)

22. Bart R. Camera lucida. Comment on the photo. Moscow: Ad Marginem Publ.; 1997. 224 p. (In Russ.)

23. Hall S. Introduction to: Representation: Cultural Representations and Signifying Practices [Internet]. SAGE Publishing. [data obrashcheniya: 29 Dec. 2017]. URL: https://fotografiaeteoria.files.wordpress.com/2015/05/the_work_of_representation__stuart_hall.pd