The formal language of Geometry as a semiotic system. Part II. Advanced syntax
https://doi.org/10.28995/2686-7249-2018-12-122-144
Abstract
The paper constitutes the second part of the article of 2017, and is devoted to the advanced syntax of the formal language of Geometry. The units of the advanced syntax are divided in two groups: the elementary syntactic units and the units that are built on the elementary ones by special operations called reductions. Those operations are assigned to reduce regular-formed expressions and thus to facilitate their perception. The author specifes two types of reductions being made on the basis of the universal laws of formal logic and being introduced into the language of special new items. At the end of the article the expressive power of the advanced syntax are discussed. The exemplifed fragment of the advanced syntax related to the theory of triangles and quadrilaterals is presented.
About the Authors
G. E. KreydlinRussian Federation
Grigorii E. Kreydlin, Dr. in Philology, professor
bld. 6, Miusskaya sq., Moscow, 125993
G. B. Shabat
Russian Federation
Georgii B. Shabat, Dr. in Physics and Mathematics, professor
bld. 6, Miusskaya sq., Moscow, 125993
References
1. Kreydlin G., Shabat G. The formal language of geometry as a semiotic system. I. Elementary syntax. RGGU Bulletin. “History. Philology. Cultural Studies. Oriental Studies”. Series. 2017;11:69-87. (In Russ.)
2. Kripke S. Identity and necessity. V: New in foreign linguistics. Vol. 13: Logic and linguistics (reference issues). Moscow, 1982. (In Russ.)
3. Shabat G. On the plurality of worlds in the science and art of 20th century. V: RSUH Conference on the Humanities. 2014. Moscow, 2015. p. 575-90. (In Russ.)
4. Kreydlin G., Shabat G. The natural language and the language of geometric sketches. Points of contact // Znaki czy nie znaki?/ Red naukowa J. Piatkowska, G. Zeldowicz. Warszawa, 2016. s. 197-21. (In Russ.)
5. Bocharov VA., Markin VI. Introduction to logic. Moscow, 2011. 296 p. (In Russ.)
6. Kreydlin G., Shabat G. The natural language and languages of science: concurrence or interaction? V: Fedorova LL., ed. Competition in language and communication. Sat scientifc works. Moscow, 2017. p. 40-56. (In Russ.)
7. Korel’skaya TD., Paducheva EV. Inverse theorem (algorithmic and heuristic processes of thought). Moscow, 1978. 64 p. (In Russ.)
8. Kreydlin G., Shabat G. Semantics of formal language of geometry. In print. (In Russ.)
9. Kreydlin G., Shabat G. The natural languages and languages of science: the problems of generation and comprehension of texts. In print. (In Russ.)
10. Kreydlin G., Shabat G. The space in natural languages and in the languages of geometry. RGGU Bulletin. “History. Philology. Cultural Studies. Oriental Studies”. Se ries. 2015;1:116-30. (In Russ.)
11. Vezhbitskaya A. Language. Culture. Cognition. Moscow, 1996. 416 p. (In Russ.)
12. Shabat G. On the symmetry in the formulation of theorems. V: Linguistics for everybody. Summer linguistic schools 2005 and 2006. Moscow, 2008. p. 203-18. (In Russ.)
13. Paducheva EV. On the semantic of syntax. Materials for the transformational grammar of the Russian language. Moscow, 1974. 292 p. (In Russ.)
Review
For citations:
Kreydlin G.E., Shabat G.B. The formal language of Geometry as a semiotic system. Part II. Advanced syntax. RSUH/RGGU Bulletin: “Literary Teory. Linguistics. Cultural Studies”, Series. 2018;(12):122-144. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.28995/2686-7249-2018-12-122-144