Preview

RSUH/RGGU Bulletin: “Literary Teory. Linguistics. Cultural Studies”, Series

Advanced search

Stylistic features of the mosaics in the Church of the Paregoritissa in Arta

https://doi.org/10.28995/2686-7249-2019-1-1-108-123

Abstract

In view of the close relationship of donors to the imperial court and the high quality of the mosaics in the church of the Paregoritissa in Arta, the work is usually attributed to Constantinople workshops, although some stylistic and iconographic details are closer to monuments of the «Macedonian School». The compositional fusion of mosaics into architectural space echoes the monuments of the mid-Byzantine period. The attribution of the mosaics in the Church of the Holy Apostles, as well as the issue of the Macedonian and the Constantinople schools has a long history. Contemporary scholars take the view that the question has no simple answer, as the role of regional centers is underestimated. They assume the existence of an artistic center in Thessalonica, where tradition was not interrupted even during the Latin conquest. It can be supposed that some of its masters were educated in Constantinople and then continued their career in Thessalonica, adapting their styles to the preferences of local donors. Taking into consideration the eclectic character of both the architecture and the sculptural decoration, it can be argued that the masters of Arta were hired from the workshops of Thessalonica. From the modeling the face of the Pantokrator and the tiny tesseras used, we may consider that the workshops of Thessalonica might have been involved in the production of portable icons.

About the Author

S. V. Tsymbal
Russian State University for the Humanities
Russian Federation

Svetlana V. Tsymbal, art historian, independent researcher

bld. 6, Miusskaya sq., Moscow, 125993



References

1. Curcic S. Architecture in the Balkans. From Diocletian to Suleyman the Magnificent. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 2010. 913 p.

2. Papadopoulou V.N. Byzantine Arta and its monuments. Athens, 2007. 165 p. 3.

3. Lazarev VN. The History of Byzantine painting. Moscow: Iskusstvo Publ.; 1986. (In Russ.)

4. Chatzidakis N. Byzantine mosaics. Ekdotike Athenon, 1994. 269 p.

5. Butyrskii MN. Byzantine art. CD. Moscow: Izdatel'stvo Direkt Media Publ.; 2006. (In Russ.)

6. Mavropoulou-Tsioumi C. Holy Apostles. Mosaics of Thessaloniki 4 th -i4 th centuries. Athens, 2012.

7. Nelson RS. Tales of Two Cities: the Patronage of Early Palaeologan Art and Architecture in Constantinople and Thessaloniki. Nikolayo K., ed. Manuel Panselinos and his Age. Athens, 1999. p. 127-40.

8. Yakovleva MI. Mosaics of the Church of the Holy Apostles in Thessaloniki: the problems of iconography, style and masters origin. RSUH/RGGU Bulletin. "Philosophy. Social Studies. Art Studies" Series. 2016;1(3):127-139. (In Russ.)

9. Yakovleva MI. On the question of the role of Thessaloniki in the artistic life of Byzantium circa 1300. V: Nalimova NA., ed. Macedonia - Rome - Byzantine. Proceedings from the scientific conference. Moscow: KDU, Universitetskaya kniga Publ.; 2017. p. 193-222. (In Russ.)

10. Aksit I. Museum of Chora. Mosaics and frescoes. Istanbul: Aksit Kultur eve Turizm Yayincilik, 2010. 155 p.

11. Lowden J. Manuscript illumination in Byzantium 1261-1557. Byzantium. Faith and power (1261-1557). New York: The Metropolitan Museum of Art; New Haven; London: Yale University Press, 2004. p. 259-93.

12. Cormack R. The icon in Constantinople around 1400. Vassilaki M., ed. The hand of Angelos. An icon painter in Venetian Crete. Athens: Benaki Museum, 2010. 256 p.

13. Nelson RS. Taxation with Representation. Visual narrative and the political field of the Kariye Camii. Art History. 1999;22:56-82.

14. Kiilerich B. Aesthetic aspects of Paleologan art in Constantinople: Some problems. Interaction and isolation in late Byzantine culture. Stockholm Swedish Research Institute in Istanbul, 1999. Р. 16-26.

15. Gerstel SEJ. Civic and monastic influences on church decoration. Dumbarton Oaks Paper. 2003;57:225-39.

16. Millet G. Recherches sur l'iconographie de l'Evagile aux XIV-e, XV-e, et XVI siecles d'apres les monuments de Mistra, de la Macedoine et du Mont-Athos. Paris, 1916.

17. Runciman S. The Last Byzantine Renaissance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1970. 106 p.


Review

For citations:


Tsymbal S.V. Stylistic features of the mosaics in the Church of the Paregoritissa in Arta. RSUH/RGGU Bulletin: “Literary Teory. Linguistics. Cultural Studies”, Series. 2019;(1-1):108-123. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.28995/2686-7249-2019-1-1-108-123

Views: 243


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2073-6355 (Print)