.png)
.png)
Email this article 
“Homo Corporis” in the socio-cultural context of early Soviet era: axiology and social practices
https://doi.org/10.28995/2686-7249-2019-8-65-82
Abstract
The article is devoted to the analysis of human body culture (physical culture) as a phenomenon strong influenced by the social and cultural context of “Homo Corporis” being. This general methodological position is revealed on the material of a concrete epoch – the period of the formation of Soviet society, characterized by its axiology of the human body and some relevant practices based on it. The analysis is based on the publications of the 1920s – 1930s, related to the development of the body (physical) culture, on the art items, art production of that time, which captures the ideal of the “new man” – strong, healthy, cheerful. The axiology of the human body in early soviet time was based on relevant conceptual and ideological substantiation, scientific and methodological investigations which were the regulators for body practices in the fields of education, socialization, leisure mass sports, etc. The key ideas that determined notably big interest of the Soviet authorities in the development of body culture were such as the strengthening of the instrumental capabilities of the body (to increase the productivity of labor, the army’s combat capability); using its potential to struggle with bad habits (mass sports as a kind of healthy leisure), to include passive women in active life, to organize new integrative multicultural space. The body culture practices were estimated as one of the accessible, “light” form for the person entering into the space of culture per se (through “correct” moral and aesthetic qualities arising). The representation of mass, people sport was considered as one of the markers to clarify the opposition to the “old” society with its bourgeois sport, the product of inhumane capitalism. This investigation is a next small step for the development of a comparative-cultural analysis of the diversity of models of body (physical) culture as an important part of modern social studies and cultural researches.
About the Author
I. M. BykhovskayaRussian Federation
Irina M. Bykhovskaya, Dr. of Sci. (Philosophy), professor
bld. 4, Vtoroy Selskohoziajstvenny proezd, Moscow, Russia, 129226
References
1. Frank A. For a sociology of the body: an analytical review. V: The Body: Social Process & Cultural Theory. L.: Sage, 1991. P. 14-36.
2. Sunik A. Essays on the domestic historiography of the history of physical culture and sport. Moscow: Sovetskii sport Publ.; 2010. 616 p. [In Russ.]
3. o’Mahony M. Sport in the USSR. Physical Culture – Visual Culture. Moscow: Novoie Literaturnoye obozrenie Publ.; 2010. 296 p. [In Russ.]
4. Petrova E., ed. Sport in Soviet porcelain, graphics, sculpture. Sankt-Petersburg: Palace Editions, 2018. 232 p. [In Russ.]
5. Edelman R. Serious fun. The history of spectator sports in the USSR. Moscow: Sovetskij sport Publ.; AIRo-XX1 Publ.; 2008. 400 p. [In Russ.]
6. Borrero M. Sport in Russia and Eastern Europe. V: Edelman R., Wilson W., eds. The Oxford handbook of sports history. N.Y.: oxford Univ. Press, 2017. P. 319-30.
7. Zikmund AA. Fundamentals of the Soviet system of physical education. Moscow: Novaja Moskva Publ.; 1926. 144 p. [In Russ.]
8. Sidorchuk IV. Discussions on the “Physical degeneration of the proletariat” and the Soviet Eugenics project of the 1920s. Izvestia. Ural Federal University. Series 2: Humanities and Arts. 2018;3:71-84. [In Russ.]
9. Semashko NA. The great shift. Izvestija fizicheskoj kul’tury.1925;18:1. [In Russ.]
10. Bykhovskaya I., Milstein o. The Soviet sociology of sport: start and... start once again. Russian sociological review. 2017;2:284-319. [In Russ.]
11. Gorinevskii V. Body culture. Motor means of physical culture. Moscow: Narkomzdrav RSFSR Publ., 1927. 318 p. [In Russ.]
12. Romm M. Handball and Italian lapta. Moscow: Vyschyi voenyi redactzionnyi sovet Publ., 1924. 78 p.
13. Semashko NA. Ways of Soviet physical culture. Moscow: Fizkul’tizdat Publ., 1926. 89 p. [In Russ.]
14. Stolbov VV. (ed.) History of physical culture and sports. Moscow: Fizkul’tura i sport Publ., 2001. 423 p. [In Russ.]
15. Zholdak I. World Spartakiada. Five year plan holiday. Moscow: Fizkultura i tourism Publ, 1932. 56 p. [In Russ.]
16. Mileev S. Art and physical culture. Moscow, Leningrad: Fizkul’tura i turizm Publ., 1931. 207 p. [In Russ.]
17. Mileev S. Physical culture and religion. Moscow: Moskovskii rabochii Publ., 1932. 71 p. [In Russ.]
18. Bourdieu P. Program for sociology of sports V: Bourdieu P. Choses dites. Мoscow: Socio-Logos Publ., 1994. P. 257-75. [In Russ.]
19. Krawczyk Z. Physical culture from the perspective of values – a general and selective approach to physical culture. V: International Review for the Sociology of Sport. 1988;2:97-107.
20. Bykhovskaya I., Lyulevich I. Axiology of human body and health: verticals and horizontals of cross-cultural analysis. V: International Journal of Cultural Research. 2018;4:208-23. [In Russ.]
21. Corbin A., Courtine JJ., Vigarello G. (eds.) History of Body. Vol. 1-3. Moscow: Novoie literaturnoye obozrenie Publ.; 2012-2016. [In Russ.]
22. Crossley N. The social body: habit, identity, and desire. L.: SAGE, 2001. 178 p.
23. Featherstone M. Body, image and affect in consumer culture. V: Body and Society. 2010;1:193-221.
24. Roberts D. Modified people: indicators of a body modification subculture in a post-subculture world. Sociology. 2014;6:1096–112.
25. Shilling K. The body and social theory. L.: SAGE, 2012. 336 p.
Supplementary files
For citation: Bykhovskaya I.M. “Homo Corporis” in the socio-cultural context of early Soviet era: axiology and social practices. RSUH/RGGU Bulletin: “Literary Teory. Linguistics. Cultural Studies”, Series. 2019;(8):65-82. https://doi.org/10.28995/2686-7249-2019-8-65-82
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
